| Literature DB >> 34801048 |
Wojciech Mlynarski1, Wojciech Fendler2,3, Agnieszka Zmyslowska4, Miljan Kuljanin2, Beata Malachowska3,5, Marcin Stanczak3, Dominika Michalek3, Aneta Wlodarczyk6, Dagmara Grot6, Joanna Taha7, Bartłomiej Pawlik1,8, Magdalena Lebiedzińska-Arciszewska9, Hanna Nieznanska9, Mariusz R Wieckowski9, Piotr Rieske6, Joseph D Mancias2, Maciej Borowiec10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wolfram syndrome (WFS) is a rare autosomal recessive syndrome in which diabetes mellitus and neurodegenerative disorders occur as a result of Wolframin deficiency and increased ER stress. In addition, WFS1 deficiency leads to calcium homeostasis disturbances and can change mitochondrial dynamics. The aim of this study was to evaluate protein levels and changes in gene transcription on human WFS cell model under experimental ER stress.Entities:
Keywords: ER stress; Mitochondria; Proteomics; Transcriptomics; Wolfram syndrome
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34801048 PMCID: PMC8605533 DOI: 10.1186/s12964-021-00791-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Commun Signal ISSN: 1478-811X Impact factor: 5.712
Fig. 1Protein expression in neuronic stem cells from WFS patients and controls before and after tunicamycin administration measured by proteomics experiment. A Log10 mean abundance of Wolframin across study groups. Whiskers represent standard deviation. One-way ANOVA p < 0.0001, p values of post-hoc Tukey tests are shown above corresponding groups; B Principle Component Analysis plot with annotated study groups. Arrows were added to components 1 and 2 as explanatory due to the observed effects of experimental reactions; C Heatmap with hierarchical clusterization performed on 50 proteins with the highest variance. Color scale represents row-standardized protein levels; D Volcano plot showing differential expression between WFS and healthy before tunicamycin administration. Significantly (FDR < 0.05) up-regulated (FC > 2) proteins are depicted in red and down-regulated (FDR < 0.05 and FC < 0.5) proteins are depicted in blue
Fig. 2Pathways significantly expressed in WFS patients compared to control. A Enrichment map presenting Reactome Gene Sets significant in comparison: WFS versus healthy. Upregulated pathways are shown in red and downregulated ones in blue. B Enrichment plot and heatmap of Reactome mitochondrial protein import Gene Set. Heatmap depicts the genes that comprise the pathway with red tiles representing increased expression in WFS versus controls. C Enrichment plot and heatmap of Reactome respiratory electron transport Gene Set. D Graphical summary of pathways significantly expressed in WFS
Summary of Reactome Gene Sets expression across comparisons in proteomics analysis
| Pathway | WFS versus healthy | WFS after tunicamycin versus WFS before | Healthy after tunicamycin versus healthy before | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactome unfolded protein response UPR | ↓ | − 1.97 | 0.001 | ↑ | 2.04 | 0.032 | ↑ | 1.46 | 0.083 |
| Reactome protein folding | ↑ | 2.09 | 0.004 | ↓ | − 0.81 | 0.959 | ↑ | 1.41 | 0.106 |
| Reactome degradation of Gli1 by the proteasome | ↑ | 2.06 | 0.003 | ↑ | 1.22 | 0.372 | ↑ | 3.19 | < 0.001 |
| Reactome mitochondrial protein import | ↓ | − 2.18 | < 0.001 | ↓ | − 1.19 | 0.496 | ↓ | − 2.18 | < 0.001 |
| Reactome respiratory electron transport | ↓ | − 2.59 | < 0.001 | ↓ | − 1.63 | 0.064 | ↓ | − 2.64 | < 0.001 |
WFS, Wolfram syndrome; UPR, unfolded protein response
Summary of transcript-level Gene Set Enrichment Analysis across comparisons in transcriptomics analysis
| Pathway | WFS versus healthy | WFS after tunicamycin versus WFS before | Healthy after tunicamycin versus healthy before | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactome unfolded protein response UPR | ↓ | − 1.29 | 0.309 | ↑ | 2.25 | 0.001 | ↑ | 1.59 | 0.125 |
| Reactome protein folding | ↓ | − 1.49 | 0.156 | ↓ | − 1.00 | 0.751 | ↓ | − 1.77 | 0.034 |
| Reactome degradation of Gli1 by the proteasome | ↓ | − 1.65 | 0.092 | ↓ | − 1.68 | 0.206 | ↓ | − 1.81 | 0.029 |
| Reactome mitochondrial protein import | ↓ | − 1.25 | 0.334 | ↓ | − 1.09 | 0.750 | ↓ | − 1.11 | 0.463 |
| Reactome respiratory electron transport | ↓ | − 1.98 | 0.022 | ↓ | − 1.63 | 0.201 | ↓ | − 2.30 | < 0.001 |
Fig. 3Relative protein level for the individual mitochondrial function elements. WFS samples are shown in red, healthy control (H) in blue. A OXPHOS Total, B TCA, C Glycolysis
Fig. 4Mitochondrial metabolic activity. Mitochondrial metabolic activity shown as a percentage of healthy (H) TM—non treated cells; (H + TM)—healthy cells treated with TM; (WFS)—patient’ TM—non treated cells; (WFS + TM)—patient’ TM treated cells. TM—tunicamycin; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 5Image from TEM analysis of morphologically altered neural stem cells from WFS patients after tunicamycin administration. Extended mitochondria are marked with arrows, altered mitochondria are marked with stars
Fig. 6Hypothesis validation on RNA-sequencing mice model data. Genes which contributed to core enrichment are marked on heatmaps with green frames. Heatmaps depict the genes that comprise the pathway with red tiles representing increased expression in WFS versus controls. A Enrichment plot and heatmap of Reactome mitochondrial protein import Gene Set performed on transcriptomics data on mice hypothalamic. B Enrichment plot and heatmap of Reactome respiratory electron transport performed on transcriptomics data on mice hypothalamic. C Enrichment plot and heatmap of Reactome mitochondrial protein import Gene Set performed on transcriptomics data on mice hippocampi. D Enrichment plot and heatmap of Reactome respiratory electron transport performed on transcriptomics data on mice hippocampi