Farhad Kosari1, Maria Disselhorst2, Jun Yin3, Tobias Peikert4, Julia Udell1, Sarah Johnson1, James Smadbeck1, Stephen Murphy1, Alexa McCune1, Giannoula Karagouga1, Aakash Desai5, Janet Schaefer-Klein1, Mitesh J Borad6, John Cheville7, George Vasmatzis1, Paul Baas2, Aaron S Mansfield8. 1. Precision Cancer Therapeutics Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 6. Precision Cancer Therapeutics Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona. 7. Precision Cancer Therapeutics Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 8. Precision Cancer Therapeutics Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: mansfield.aaron@mayo.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The favorable outcomes with immunotherapy for mesothelioma were somewhat unexpected because this tumor has a low tumor mutation burden which has been associated with benefit in other cancers. Because chromosomal rearrangements are common in mesothelioma and have neoantigenic potential, we sought to determine whether they are associated with survival in patients treated with immunotherapy. METHODS: Pleural biopsies of mesothelioma after at least one line of therapy were obtained from patients (n = 44) before treatment with nivolumab alone (NCT29908324) or in combination with ipilimumab (NCT30660511). RNA and whole-genome sequencing were performed to identify the junctions resulting from chromosomal rearrangements and antigen processing and presentation gene set expression. Associations with overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox models. An OS cutoff of 1.5 years was used to distinguish patients with and without durable benefit for use in receiving operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Although tumor junction burdens were not predictive of OS, we identified significant interactions between the junction burdens and multiple antigen processing and presentation gene sets. The "regulation of antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen" gene set revealed an interaction with tumor junction burden and was predictive of OS. This interaction also predicted 1.5-year or greater survival with an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.83. This interaction was not predictive of survival in a separate cohort of patients with mesothelioma who did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of structural variants and antigen presentation gene set expression may facilitate patient selection for immune checkpoint inhibitors.
INTRODUCTION: The favorable outcomes with immunotherapy for mesothelioma were somewhat unexpected because this tumor has a low tumor mutation burden which has been associated with benefit in other cancers. Because chromosomal rearrangements are common in mesothelioma and have neoantigenic potential, we sought to determine whether they are associated with survival in patients treated with immunotherapy. METHODS: Pleural biopsies of mesothelioma after at least one line of therapy were obtained from patients (n = 44) before treatment with nivolumab alone (NCT29908324) or in combination with ipilimumab (NCT30660511). RNA and whole-genome sequencing were performed to identify the junctions resulting from chromosomal rearrangements and antigen processing and presentation gene set expression. Associations with overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox models. An OS cutoff of 1.5 years was used to distinguish patients with and without durable benefit for use in receiving operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Although tumor junction burdens were not predictive of OS, we identified significant interactions between the junction burdens and multiple antigen processing and presentation gene sets. The "regulation of antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen" gene set revealed an interaction with tumor junction burden and was predictive of OS. This interaction also predicted 1.5-year or greater survival with an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.83. This interaction was not predictive of survival in a separate cohort of patients with mesothelioma who did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of structural variants and antigen presentation gene set expression may facilitate patient selection for immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Authors: Travis M Drucker; Sarah H Johnson; Stephen J Murphy; Kendall W Cradic; Terry M Therneau; George Vasmatzis Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Sarah H Johnson; James B Smadbeck; Stephanie A Smoley; Athanasios Gaitatzes; Stephen J Murphy; Faye R Harris; Travis M Drucker; Roman M Zenka; Beth A Pitel; Ross A Rowsey; Nicole L Hoppman; Umut Aypar; William R Sukov; Robert B Jenkins; Andrew L Feldman; Hutton M Kearney; George Vasmatzis Journal: Cancer Genet Date: 2017-12-02
Authors: Samra Turajlic; Kevin Litchfield; Hang Xu; Rachel Rosenthal; Nicholas McGranahan; James L Reading; Yien Ning S Wong; Andrew Rowan; Nnennaya Kanu; Maise Al Bakir; Tim Chambers; Roberto Salgado; Peter Savas; Sherene Loi; Nicolai J Birkbak; Laurent Sansregret; Martin Gore; James Larkin; Sergio A Quezada; Charles Swanton Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Michele Carbone; Prasad S Adusumilli; H Richard Alexander; Paul Baas; Fabrizio Bardelli; Angela Bononi; Raphael Bueno; Emanuela Felley-Bosco; Francoise Galateau-Salle; David Jablons; Aaron S Mansfield; Michael Minaai; Marc de Perrot; Patricia Pesavento; Valerie Rusch; David T Severson; Emanuela Taioli; Anne Tsao; Gavitt Woodard; Haining Yang; Marjorie G Zauderer; Harvey I Pass Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: D J McGrail; P G Pilié; N U Rashid; L Voorwerk; M Slagter; M Kok; E Jonasch; M Khasraw; A B Heimberger; B Lim; N T Ueno; J K Litton; R Ferrarotto; J T Chang; S L Moulder; S-Y Lin Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Josine Quispel-Janssen; Vincent van der Noort; Jeltje F de Vries; Marion Zimmerman; Ferry Lalezari; Erik Thunnissen; Kim Monkhorst; Robert Schouten; Laurel Schunselaar; Maria Disselhorst; Houke Klomp; Koen Hartemink; Sjaak Burgers; Wieneke Buikhuisen; Paul Baas Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Maria Ochoa de Olza; David Barras; Isaac Crespo; Melita Irving; George Coukos; Fernanda G Herrera; Catherine Ronet; Massimo Andreatta; Jesus Corria-Osorio; Aodrenn Spill; Fabrizio Benedetti; Raphael Genolet; Angela Orcurto; Martina Imbimbo; Eleonora Ghisoni; Blanca Navarro Rodrigo; Dominik R Berthold; Apostolos Sarivalasis; Khalil Zaman; Rafael Duran; Clarisse Dromain; John Prior; Niklaus Schaefer; Jean Bourhis; Georgia Dimopoulou; Zoi Tsourti; Marius Messemaker; Thomas Smith; Sarah E Warren; Periklis Foukas; Sylvie Rusakiewicz; Mikaël J Pittet; Stefan Zimmermann; Christine Sempoux; Urania Dafni; Alexandre Harari; Lana E Kandalaft; Santiago J Carmona; Denarda Dangaj Laniti Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Yan W Asmann; Kaushal Parikh; P Leif Bergsagel; Haidong Dong; Alex A Adjei; Mitesh J Borad; Aaron S Mansfield Journal: NPJ Precis Oncol Date: 2021-03-19
Authors: Dean A Fennell; Sean Ewings; Christian Ottensmeier; Raffaele Califano; Gerard G Hanna; Kayleigh Hill; Sarah Danson; Nicola Steele; Mavis Nye; Lucy Johnson; Joanne Lord; Calley Middleton; Peter Szlosarek; Sam Chan; Aarti Gaba; Liz Darlison; Peter Wells-Jordan; Cathy Richards; Charlotte Poile; Jason F Lester; Gareth Griffiths Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 41.316