Riho Nakajima1, Masashi Kinoshita2, Hirokazu Okita3, Mitsutoshi Nakada4. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan. mnakada@med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The outcome of awake surgery has been evaluated based on functional factors, return to work, and oncological aspects, and there have been no reports directly examining QOL. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of QOL following awake surgery and to determine the functional factors influencing QOL. METHODS: Seventy patients with WHO grade II/III gliomas were included. For the assessment of QOL, we used the SF-36 and calculated summary and sub-component scores. Three summary component scores, including physical (PCS), mental (MCS), and role/social summary (RCS) component scores, were computed based on sub-component scores. Additionally, various assessments of neurological/neuropsychological function were performed. We performed univariate and multiple regression analyses to investigate the functional factors influencing the SF-36. RESULTS: PCS and MCS were maintained, but only RCS was low to 42.0 ± 16.1. We then focused on the RCS and its sub-components: general health (GH), role physical (RP), social functioning (SF), and role emotional (RE). Multiple regression analysis showed following significant correlations between the sub-component scores and brain functions: GH to executive function and movement (p = 0.0033 and 0.032), RP to verbal fluency and movement (p = 0.0057 and 0.0010), and RE to verbal fluency (p = 0.020). Furthermore, when the sub-component scores were compared between groups with and without functional deficits related to GH, RP, and RE, each score was significantly lower in the groups with functional deficits (p = 0.012, 0.014, and 0.0049, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent awake surgery, a subset of patients had low QOL because of poor RCS. Functional factors influencing QOL included executive function, verbal fluency, and movement.
INTRODUCTION: The outcome of awake surgery has been evaluated based on functional factors, return to work, and oncological aspects, and there have been no reports directly examining QOL. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of QOL following awake surgery and to determine the functional factors influencing QOL. METHODS: Seventy patients with WHO grade II/III gliomas were included. For the assessment of QOL, we used the SF-36 and calculated summary and sub-component scores. Three summary component scores, including physical (PCS), mental (MCS), and role/social summary (RCS) component scores, were computed based on sub-component scores. Additionally, various assessments of neurological/neuropsychological function were performed. We performed univariate and multiple regression analyses to investigate the functional factors influencing the SF-36. RESULTS: PCS and MCS were maintained, but only RCS was low to 42.0 ± 16.1. We then focused on the RCS and its sub-components: general health (GH), role physical (RP), social functioning (SF), and role emotional (RE). Multiple regression analysis showed following significant correlations between the sub-component scores and brain functions: GH to executive function and movement (p = 0.0033 and 0.032), RP to verbal fluency and movement (p = 0.0057 and 0.0010), and RE to verbal fluency (p = 0.020). Furthermore, when the sub-component scores were compared between groups with and without functional deficits related to GH, RP, and RE, each score was significantly lower in the groups with functional deficits (p = 0.012, 0.014, and 0.0049, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent awake surgery, a subset of patients had low QOL because of poor RCS. Functional factors influencing QOL included executive function, verbal fluency, and movement.
Authors: Michel Thiebaut de Schotten; Marika Urbanski; Hugues Duffau; Emmanuelle Volle; Richard Lévy; Bruno Dubois; Paolo Bartolomeo Journal: Science Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Philip C De Witt Hamer; Santiago Gil Robles; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Hugues Duffau; Mitchel S Berger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 44.544