Kai Wu1,2, Peng Wu1,2, Kai Yang3, Zhe Li1,2, Sijia Kong1,2, Lu Yu1,2, Enpu Zhang1,2, Hanlin Liu1,2, Qing Guo1,2, Song Wu4,5,6. 1. Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518001, China. 2. Shenzhen Following Precision Medical Research Institute, Luohu Hospital Group, Shenzhen, 518001, China. 3. Department of Urology, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518116, China. 4. Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518001, China. wusong@szu.edu.cn. 5. Department of Urology, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518116, China. wusong@szu.edu.cn. 6. Teaching Center of Shenzhen Luohu Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, China. wusong@szu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We tried to realize accurate pathological classification, assessment of prognosis, and genomic molecular typing of renal cell carcinoma by CT texture feature analysis. To determine whether CT texture features can perform accurate pathological classification and evaluation of prognosis and genomic characteristics in renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with renal cell carcinoma from five open-source cohorts were analyzed retrospectively in this study. These data were randomly split to train and test machine learning algorithms to segment the lesion, predict the histological subtype, tumor stage, and pathological grade. Dice coefficient and performance metrics such as accuracy and AUC were calculated to evaluate the segmentation and classification model. Quantitative decomposition of the predictive model was conducted to explore the contribution of each feature. Besides, survival analysis and the statistical correlation between CT texture features, pathological, and genomic signatures were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 569 enhanced CT images of 443 patients (mean age 59.4, 278 males) were included in the analysis. In the segmentation task, the mean dice coefficient was 0.96 for the kidney and 0.88 for the cancer region. For classification of histologic subtype, tumor stage, and pathological grade, the model was on a par with radiologists and the AUC was 0.83 [Formula: see text] 0.1, 0.80 [Formula: see text] 0.1, and 0.77 [Formula: see text] 0.1 at 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Moreover, specific quantitative CT features related to clinical prognosis were identified. A strong statistical correlation (R2 = 0.83) between the feature crosses and genomic characteristics was shown. The structural equation modeling confirmed significant associations between CT features, pathological (β = - 0.75), and molecular subtype (β = - 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The framework illustrates high performance in the pathological classification of renal cell carcinoma. Prognosis and genomic characteristics can be inferred by quantitative image analysis. KEY POINTS: • The analytical framework exhibits high-performance pathological classification of renal cell carcinoma and is on a par with human radiologists. • Quantitative decomposition of the predictive model shows that specific texture features contribute to histologic subtype and tumor stage classification. • Structural equation modeling shows the associations of genomic characteristics to CT texture features. Overall survival and molecular characteristics can be inferred by quantitative CT texture analysis in renal cell carcinoma.
OBJECTIVES: We tried to realize accurate pathological classification, assessment of prognosis, and genomic molecular typing of renal cell carcinoma by CT texture feature analysis. To determine whether CT texture features can perform accurate pathological classification and evaluation of prognosis and genomic characteristics in renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with renal cell carcinoma from five open-source cohorts were analyzed retrospectively in this study. These data were randomly split to train and test machine learning algorithms to segment the lesion, predict the histological subtype, tumor stage, and pathological grade. Dice coefficient and performance metrics such as accuracy and AUC were calculated to evaluate the segmentation and classification model. Quantitative decomposition of the predictive model was conducted to explore the contribution of each feature. Besides, survival analysis and the statistical correlation between CT texture features, pathological, and genomic signatures were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 569 enhanced CT images of 443 patients (mean age 59.4, 278 males) were included in the analysis. In the segmentation task, the mean dice coefficient was 0.96 for the kidney and 0.88 for the cancer region. For classification of histologic subtype, tumor stage, and pathological grade, the model was on a par with radiologists and the AUC was 0.83 [Formula: see text] 0.1, 0.80 [Formula: see text] 0.1, and 0.77 [Formula: see text] 0.1 at 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Moreover, specific quantitative CT features related to clinical prognosis were identified. A strong statistical correlation (R2 = 0.83) between the feature crosses and genomic characteristics was shown. The structural equation modeling confirmed significant associations between CT features, pathological (β = - 0.75), and molecular subtype (β = - 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The framework illustrates high performance in the pathological classification of renal cell carcinoma. Prognosis and genomic characteristics can be inferred by quantitative image analysis. KEY POINTS: • The analytical framework exhibits high-performance pathological classification of renal cell carcinoma and is on a par with human radiologists. • Quantitative decomposition of the predictive model shows that specific texture features contribute to histologic subtype and tumor stage classification. • Structural equation modeling shows the associations of genomic characteristics to CT texture features. Overall survival and molecular characteristics can be inferred by quantitative CT texture analysis in renal cell carcinoma.
Authors: Christopher B Dechet; Horst Zincke; Thomas J Sebo; Bernard F King; Andrew J LeRoy; George M Farrow; Michael L Blute Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Scott Mayer McKinney; Marcin Sieniek; Varun Godbole; Jonathan Godwin; Natasha Antropova; Hutan Ashrafian; Trevor Back; Mary Chesus; Greg S Corrado; Ara Darzi; Mozziyar Etemadi; Florencia Garcia-Vicente; Fiona J Gilbert; Mark Halling-Brown; Demis Hassabis; Sunny Jansen; Alan Karthikesalingam; Christopher J Kelly; Dominic King; Joseph R Ledsam; David Melnick; Hormuz Mostofi; Lily Peng; Joshua Jay Reicher; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Richard Sidebottom; Mustafa Suleyman; Daniel Tse; Kenneth C Young; Jeffrey De Fauw; Shravya Shetty Journal: Nature Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 49.962