Literature DB >> 34799446

Microbiome stability and structure is governed by host phylogeny over diet and geography in woodrats (Neotoma spp.).

Sara B Weinstein1, Rodolfo Martínez-Mota2,3, Tess E Stapleton2, Dylan M Klure2, Robert Greenhalgh2, Teri J Orr4, Colin Dale2, Kevin D Kohl5, M Denise Dearing2.   

Abstract

The microbiome is critical for host survival and fitness, but gaps remain in our understanding of how this symbiotic community is structured. Despite evidence that related hosts often harbor similar bacterial communities, it is unclear whether this pattern is due to genetic similarities between hosts or to common ecological selection pressures. Here, using herbivorous rodents in the genus Neotoma, we quantify how geography, diet, and host genetics, alongside neutral processes, influence microbiome structure and stability under natural and captive conditions. Using bacterial and plant metabarcoding, we first characterized dietary and microbiome compositions for animals from 25 populations, representing seven species from 19 sites across the southwestern United States. We then brought wild animals into captivity, reducing the influence of environmental variation. In nature, geography, diet, and phylogeny collectively explained ∼50% of observed microbiome variation. Diet and microbiome diversity were correlated, with different toxin-enriched diets selecting for distinct microbial symbionts. Although diet and geography influenced natural microbiome structure, the effects of host phylogeny were stronger for both wild and captive animals. In captivity, gut microbiomes were altered; however, responses were species specific, indicating again that host genetic background is the most significant predictor of microbiome composition and stability. In captivity, diet effects declined and the effects of host genetic similarity increased. By bridging a critical divide between studies in wild and captive animals, this work underscores the extent to which genetics shape microbiome structure and stability in closely related hosts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; DNA metabarcoding; Neotoma; neutral model; phylosymbiosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34799446      PMCID: PMC8617456          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2108787118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  59 in total

1.  Diet specialization selects for an unusual and simplified gut microbiota in two- and three-toed sloths.

Authors:  Kimberly A Dill-McFarland; Paul J Weimer; Jonathan N Pauli; M Zachariah Peery; Garret Suen
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.491

2.  Herbivorous rodents (Neotoma spp.) harbour abundant and active foregut microbiota.

Authors:  Kevin D Kohl; Aaron W Miller; James E Marvin; Roderick Mackie; M Denise Dearing
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 3.  The devil lies in the details: how variations in polysaccharide fine-structure impact the physiology and evolution of gut microbes.

Authors:  Eric C Martens; Amelia G Kelly; Alexandra S Tauzin; Harry Brumer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Dispersal limitation promotes the diversification of the mammalian gut microbiota.

Authors:  Andrew H Moeller; Taichi A Suzuki; Dana Lin; Eileen A Lacey; Samuel K Wasser; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  No evidence for phylosymbiosis in western chipmunk species.

Authors:  Kirsten Grond; Kayce C Bell; John R Demboski; Malia Santos; Jack M Sullivan; Sarah M Hird
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.194

6.  Diet dominates host genotype in shaping the murine gut microbiota.

Authors:  Rachel N Carmody; Georg K Gerber; Jesus M Luevano; Daniel M Gatti; Lisa Somes; Karen L Svenson; Peter J Turnbaugh
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 21.023

7.  Genes, geology and germs: gut microbiota across a primate hybrid zone are explained by site soil properties, not host species.

Authors:  Laura E Grieneisen; Marie J E Charpentier; Susan C Alberts; Ran Blekhman; Gideon Bradburd; Jenny Tung; Elizabeth A Archie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evolutionary and ecological consequences of gut microbial communities.

Authors:  Nancy A Moran; Howard Ochman; Tobin J Hammer
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 13.915

9.  Microbial Community Transplant Results in Increased and Long-Term Oxalate Degradation.

Authors:  Aaron W Miller; Kelly F Oakeson; Colin Dale; M Denise Dearing
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 10.  Effects of Secondary Plant Metabolites on Microbial Populations: Changes in Community Structure and Metabolic Activity in Contaminated Environments.

Authors:  Lucie Musilova; Jakub Ridl; Marketa Polivkova; Tomas Macek; Ondrej Uhlik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  7 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Bacterial and Fungal Skin Communities of Montane Salamanders of Central Mexico.

Authors:  Julio César García-Sánchez; José Arredondo-Centeno; María Guadalupe Segovia-Ramírez; Ariadna Marcela Tenorio Olvera; Gabriela Parra-Olea; Vance T Vredenburg; Sean M Rovito
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Pigmentation biosynthesis influences the microbiome in sea urchins.

Authors:  Gary M Wessel; Masato Kiyomoto; Adam M Reitzel; Tyler J Carrier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Microbes set the (woodrat) menu: Host genetics control diet-specific gut microbes.

Authors:  Taichi A Suzuki; Ruth E Ley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Phylosymbiosis Pattern Between the Fig Wasps of the Same Genus and Their Associated Microbiota.

Authors:  Jiaxing Li; Xianqin Wei; Dawei Huang; Jinhua Xiao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Improving Bambara Groundnut Production: Insight Into the Role of Omics and Beneficial Bacteria.

Authors:  Caroline Fadeke Ajilogba; Oluwaseyi Samuel Olanrewaju; Olubukola Oluranti Babalola
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  A ridge-to-reef ecosystem microbial census reveals environmental reservoirs for animal and plant microbiomes.

Authors:  Anthony S Amend; Sean O I Swift; John L Darcy; Mahdi Belcaid; Craig E Nelson; Joshua Buchanan; Nicolas Cetraro; Kauaoa M S Fraiola; Kiana Frank; Kacie Kajihara; Terrance G McDermot; Margaret McFall-Ngai; Matthew Medeiros; Camilo Mora; Kirsten K Nakayama; Nhu H Nguyen; Randi L Rollins; Peter Sadowski; Wesley Sparagon; Mélisandre A Téfit; Joanne Y Yew; Danyel Yogi; Nicole A Hynson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Demonstrating the role of symbionts in mediating detoxification in herbivores.

Authors:  M Denise Dearing; Martin Kaltenpoth; Jonathan Gershenzon
Journal:  Symbiosis       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.109

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.