| Literature DB >> 34799419 |
Lanzhou Jiao1, Yaping Wang2, Jiyong Jiang1, Xiuying Wang1, Wenqing Zhang1, Chenggong Zhu1, Yang Xiang3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the strategy and value of centralized surveillance of hydatidiform mole at a regional hospital in China and to investigate the necessity of prophylactic chemotherapy for high-risk complete hydatidiform mole.Entities:
Keywords: hydatidiform mole
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34799419 PMCID: PMC8862018 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer ISSN: 1048-891X Impact factor: 3.437
Figure 1Flowchart of the outcomes of women with hydatidiform mole. CHM, complete hydatidiform mole; HM, hydatidiform mole; pGTN, post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; PHM, partial hydatidiform mole; UHM, unclassified hydatidiform mole.
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) prognostic score analysis of the 52 patients with post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in different FIGO anatomical stages
| FIGO anatomical | N | FIGO score | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| I | 16 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| III | 35 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| IV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 52 | 11 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 2 |
Comparison of the pre-treatment assessment of patients with post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in low-risk and high-risk complete hydatidiform mole groups
| Assessment index | Post-molar gestational | Post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in high-risk complete hydatidiform mole group (n=28) | Z value | P value |
| Interval from end of index pregnancy to treatment (days), median (Q25–Q75) | 47 (35–80) | 45.5 (37–66) | −0.199 | 0.842 |
| Pretreatment serum hCG (IU/L), median (Q25–Q75) | 1767 (275–14 342) | 4688 (1202–14 689) | −1.022 | 0.307 |
| FIGO anatomical stage (n) | −0.692 | 0.489 | ||
|
| 8 | 8 | ||
|
| 1 | 0 | ||
|
| 14 | 20 | ||
| FIGO score (n) | −1.896 | 0.058 | ||
|
| 7 | 2 | ||
|
| 8 | 9 | ||
|
| 2 | 9 | ||
|
| 6 | 5 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | ||
|
| 0 | 2 |
FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Overall treatment outcomes of the 51 patients with post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated with chemotherapy
| Treatment | N | Results, n (%) | |
| Complete remission | Drug resistance | ||
| First-line chemotherapy | 51 | 32 (62.7) | 19 (37.3) |
|
| 25 | 16 | 9† |
|
| 21 | 12 | 9 |
|
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Second-line chemotherapy | 19 | 16 (84.2) | 3 (15.8) |
|
| 8 | 7 | 1 |
|
| 5 | 3 | 2 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 |
|
| 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Third-line chemotherapy | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Fourth-line chemotherapy | 1 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |
*Five-day intravenous Act-D in 15 patients and biweekly pulsed intravenous Act-D in 10 patients.
†Five-day intravenous Act-D in 4 patients and biweekly pulsed intravenous Act-D in 5 patients.
‡All received biweekly pulsed intravenous Act-D.
Act-D, actinomycin D; MTX-FA: methotrexate with folinic acid; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; FAV, 5-FU+Act-D+vincristine; EMA/CO, etoposide +MTX+Act-D alternating with cyclophosphamide and vincristine; FAEV, 5-FU+Act-D+etoposide+vincristine.