Mingru Yin1, Menghui Li1, Wenzhi Li1, Ling Wu1, Zhiguang Yan1, Jilang Zhao1, Jie Ouyang1, Qifeng Lyu2, Zheng Yan3, Bin Li4. 1. Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. lyuqifeng@126.com. 3. Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. yanzheng369@163.com. 4. Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. libinliccc@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore whether artificial oocyte activation (AOA) can improve embryo developmental potentiality and pregnancy outcomes for patients with a history of embryo developmental problem. METHODS: This was a retrospective study and candidate patients with embryo development problems were collected. A total of 1422 MII eggs from the enrolled 140 patients were randomized divided equally into 2 groups, half for the AOA group (AOA), and the rest of sibling mature eggs for the control group (non-AOA). The patients were further divided into two subgroups: (1) the rate of good-quality day 3 embryos was 0% (group 1, n = 66); (2) the rate of good-quality day 3 embryos ranged from 1 to 30% (group 2, n = 74). RESULTS: In the early embryonic growth, there were no significant differences in the outcomes of AOA and non-AOA groups in terms of normal fertilization rates, cleavage rates, day 3 good-quality embryo rates and available blastocyst rates (72.7% vs. 79.3%, 97.4% vs. 98.0%, 20.1% vs. 19.7%, 6.6% vs. 8.4% in group 1, respectively; 77.7% vs. 81.9%, 98.1% vs. 97.0%, 25.8% vs. 22.1%, 9.6% vs. 9.3% in group 2, respectively). In the late embryonic growth, no significant differences were found in biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates, miscarriage rates, and live-birth rates (50.0% vs. 45.2%, 45.2% vs. 40.5%, 37.3% vs. 31.3%, 10.5% vs. 11.8%, 40.5% vs. 35.7%, respectively) between two groups. In addition, neonatal outcomes were similar in both the groups as well. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the AOA using ionomycin 1 h after ICSI did not bring benefits to the early or late development of embryos derived from patients with a history of embryo developmental problems.
PURPOSE: To explore whether artificial oocyte activation (AOA) can improve embryo developmental potentiality and pregnancy outcomes for patients with a history of embryo developmental problem. METHODS: This was a retrospective study and candidate patients with embryo development problems were collected. A total of 1422 MII eggs from the enrolled 140 patients were randomized divided equally into 2 groups, half for the AOA group (AOA), and the rest of sibling mature eggs for the control group (non-AOA). The patients were further divided into two subgroups: (1) the rate of good-quality day 3 embryos was 0% (group 1, n = 66); (2) the rate of good-quality day 3 embryos ranged from 1 to 30% (group 2, n = 74). RESULTS: In the early embryonic growth, there were no significant differences in the outcomes of AOA and non-AOA groups in terms of normal fertilization rates, cleavage rates, day 3 good-quality embryo rates and available blastocyst rates (72.7% vs. 79.3%, 97.4% vs. 98.0%, 20.1% vs. 19.7%, 6.6% vs. 8.4% in group 1, respectively; 77.7% vs. 81.9%, 98.1% vs. 97.0%, 25.8% vs. 22.1%, 9.6% vs. 9.3% in group 2, respectively). In the late embryonic growth, no significant differences were found in biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates, miscarriage rates, and live-birth rates (50.0% vs. 45.2%, 45.2% vs. 40.5%, 37.3% vs. 31.3%, 10.5% vs. 11.8%, 40.5% vs. 35.7%, respectively) between two groups. In addition, neonatal outcomes were similar in both the groups as well. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the AOA using ionomycin 1 h after ICSI did not bring benefits to the early or late development of embryos derived from patients with a history of embryo developmental problems.