Literature DB >> 34796765

Ghost infarct core following endovascular reperfusion: A risk for computed tomography perfusion misguided selection in stroke.

Gabriel M Rodrigues1, Mahmoud H Mohammaden1, Diogo C Haussen1, Mehdi Bouslama1, Krishnan Ravindran1, Leonardo Pisani1, Adam Prater1, Michael R Frankel1, Raul G Nogueira1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) has been increasingly used for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy for stroke. However, previous studies suggested that CTP might overestimate the infarct size. The term ghost infarct core (GIC) has been used to describe an overestimation of the final infarct volumes by pre-treatment CTP of >10 ml. AIM: We sought to study the frequency and predictors of GIC.
METHODS: A prospectively collected mechanical thrombectomy database at a comprehensive stroke center between September 2010 and August 2020 was reviewed. Patients were included if they had a successful reperfusion (mTICI2b-3), a pre-procedure CTP, and final infarct volume measured on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of GIC.
RESULTS: Among 923 eligible patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [55-75] years; NIHSS, 16 [11-21]; onset to reperfusion time, 436.5 [286-744.5] min), GIC was identified in 77 (8.3%) of the overall patients and in 14% (47/335) of those reperfused within 6 h of symptom onset. The median overestimation volume was 23.2 [16.4-38.3] mL. GIC was associated with higher NIHSS score, larger areas of infarct core and tissue at risk on CTP, unfavorable collateral scores, and shorter times from onset to image acquisition and to reperfusion as compared to non-GIC. Patients with GIC had smaller median final infarct volumes (10.7 vs. 27.1 ml, p < 0.001), higher chances of functional independence (76.2% vs. 55.5%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.829, 95% CI [1.505-9.737], p = 0.005), lower disability (one-point-mRS improvement, aOR 1.761, 95% CI [1.044-2.981], p = 0.03), and lower mortality (6.3% vs. 15%, aOR 0.119, 95% CI [0.014-0.984], p = 0.048) at 90 days. On multivariable analysis, time from onset to reperfusion ≤6 h (OR 3.184, 95% CI [1.743-5.815], p < 0.001), poor collaterals (OR 2.688, 95% CI [1.466-4.931], p = 0.001), and higher NIHSS score (OR 1.060, 95% CI [1.010-1.113], p = 0.018) were independent predictors of GIC.
CONCLUSION: GIC is a relatively common entity, particularly in patients with poor collateral status, higher baseline NIHSS score, and early presentation, and is associated with more favorable outcomes. Patients should not be excluded from reperfusion therapies on the sole basis of CTP findings, especially in the early window.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTP; Stroke; collaterals; ghost core; infarct size; thrombectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34796765     DOI: 10.1177/17474930211056228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  2 in total

1.  Perfusion Scotoma: A Potential Core Underestimation in CT Perfusion in the Delayed Time Window in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  K Abrams; G Dabus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.966

2.  Accuracy of CT Perfusion-Based Core Estimation of Follow-up Infarction: Effects of Time Since Last Known Well.

Authors:  Amrou Sarraj; Bruce C V Campbell; Soren Christensen; Clark W Sitton; Shekhar Khanpara; Roy F Riascos; Deep Pujara; Faris Shaker; Gagan Sharma; Maarten G Lansberg; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 11.800

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.