Anita N Chary1,2,3,4,5, Noelle Castilla-Ojo6, Christopher Joshi7, Ilianna Santangelo1, Christopher R Carpenter8,9, Kei Ouchi2,10, Aanand D Naik4,5, Shan W Liu1,6, Maura Kennedy1,6. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 5. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 6. School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. School of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA. 8. Department of Emergency Medicine, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 9. Emergency Care Research Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 10. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evaluating older adults with cognitive dysfunction in emergency departments (EDs) requires obtaining collateral information from sources other than the patient. Understanding the challenges emergency clinicians face in obtaining collateral information can inform development of interventions to improve geriatric emergency care and, more specifically, detection of ED delirium. The objective was to understand emergency clinicians' experiences obtaining collateral information on older adults with cognitive dysfunction, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: From February to May 2021, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 22 emergency physicians and advanced practice providers from two urban academic hospitals and one community hospital in the Northeast United States. Interviews lasted 10-20 min and were digitally recorded and transcribed. Interview transcripts were analyzed for dominant themes using a combined deductive-inductive approach. Responses regarding experiences before and during the pandemic were compared. RESULTS: Five major challenges emerged regarding (1) availability of caregivers, (2) reliability of sources, (3) language barriers, (4) time constraints, and (5) incomplete transfer documentation. Participants perceived all challenges, but those relating to transfer documentation were amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Emergency clinicians' perspectives can inform efforts to support caregiver presence at bedside and develop standardized communication tools to improve recognition of delirium and, more broadly, geriatric emergency care.
BACKGROUND: Evaluating older adults with cognitive dysfunction in emergency departments (EDs) requires obtaining collateral information from sources other than the patient. Understanding the challenges emergency clinicians face in obtaining collateral information can inform development of interventions to improve geriatric emergency care and, more specifically, detection of ED delirium. The objective was to understand emergency clinicians' experiences obtaining collateral information on older adults with cognitive dysfunction, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: From February to May 2021, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 22 emergency physicians and advanced practice providers from two urban academic hospitals and one community hospital in the Northeast United States. Interviews lasted 10-20 min and were digitally recorded and transcribed. Interview transcripts were analyzed for dominant themes using a combined deductive-inductive approach. Responses regarding experiences before and during the pandemic were compared. RESULTS: Five major challenges emerged regarding (1) availability of caregivers, (2) reliability of sources, (3) language barriers, (4) time constraints, and (5) incomplete transfer documentation. Participants perceived all challenges, but those relating to transfer documentation were amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Emergency clinicians' perspectives can inform efforts to support caregiver presence at bedside and develop standardized communication tools to improve recognition of delirium and, more broadly, geriatric emergency care.
Authors: Christopher L Bennett; Ashley F Sullivan; Adit A Ginde; John Rogers; Janice A Espinola; Carson E Clay; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Teresita M Hogan; Eve D Losman; Christopher R Carpenter; Karen Sauvigne; Cheryl Irmiter; Linda Emanuel; Rosanne M Leipzig Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jin H Han; Amanda Wilson; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Ayumi Shintani; John F Schnelle; Robert S Dittus; Amy J Graves; Alan B Storrow; John Shuster; E Wesley Ely Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Cameron J Gettel; Roland C Merchant; Yanan Li; Sara Long; Austin Tam; Sarah J Marks; Elizabeth M Goldberg Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Anita Chary; Shan W Liu; Lauren Southerland; Lauren Cameron-Comasco; Kei Ouchi; Christopher R Carpenter; Edward W Boyer; Aanand D Naik; Maura Kennedy Journal: J Geriatr Emerg Med Date: 2022-07-27