Literature DB >> 34796276

Household serial interval of COVID-19 and the effect of Variant B.1.1.7: analyses from prospective community cohort study (Virus Watch).

Cyril Geismar1, Ellen Fragaszy2,3, Vincent Nguyen1,2, Wing Lam Erica Fong2, Madhumita Shrotri2, Sarah Beale1,2, Alison Rodger4, Vasileios Lampos5, Thomas Byrne2, Jana Kovar1, Annalan M D Navaratnam1,2, Parth Patel2, Robert W Aldridge2, Andrew Hayward1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Increased transmissibility of B.1.1.7 variant of concern (VOC) in the UK may explain its rapid emergence and global spread. We analysed data from putative household infector - infectee pairs in the Virus Watch Community cohort study to assess the serial interval of COVID-19 and whether this was affected by emergence of the B.1.1.7 variant.
Methods: The Virus Watch study is an online, prospective, community cohort study following up entire households in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic. Putative household infector-infectee pairs were identified where more than one person in the household had a positive swab matched to an illness episode. Data on whether or not individual infections were caused by the B.1.1.7 variant were not available. We therefore developed a classification system based on the percentage of cases estimated to be due to B.1.1.7 in national surveillance data for different English regions and study weeks.
Results: Out of 24,887 illnesses reported, 915 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 186 likely 'infector-infectee' pairs in 186 households amongst 372 individuals were identified. The mean COVID-19 serial interval was 3.18 (95%CI: 2.55-3.81, sd=4.36) days. There was no significant difference (p=0.267) between the mean serial interval for VOC hotspots (mean = 3.64 days, (95%CI: 2.55 - 4.73)) days and non-VOC hotspots, (mean = 2.72 days, (95%CI: 1.48 - 3.96)). Conclusions: Our estimates of the average serial interval of COVID-19 are broadly similar to estimates from previous studies and we find no evidence that B.1.1.7 is associated with a change in serial intervals.  Alternative explanations such as increased viral load, longer period of viral shedding or improved receptor binding may instead explain the increased transmissibility and rapid spread and should undergo further investigation. Copyright:
© 2021 Geismar C et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B.1.1.7; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; UK; epidemiology; serial interval; variant of concern

Year:  2021        PMID: 34796276      PMCID: PMC8564743.2          DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16974.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wellcome Open Res        ISSN: 2398-502X


  2 in total

1.  Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19.

Authors:  Joren Raymenants; Caspar Geenen; Jonathan Thibaut; Klaas Nelissen; Sarah Gorissen; Emmanuel Andre
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022.

Authors:  Yan Niu; Li Luo; Shiting Yang; Guzainuer Abudurusuli; Xiaoye Wang; Zeyu Zhao; Jia Rui; Zhuoyang Li; Bin Deng; Weikang Liu; Zhe Zhang; Kangguo Li; Chan Liu; Peihua Li; Jiefeng Huang; Tianlong Yang; Yao Wang; Tianmu Chen; Qun Li
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.