| Literature DB >> 34795884 |
Na Zhao1, Zhanhong Tian2, Yang Li3, Haihua Yu4, Yu Yang5.
Abstract
As the standard of life has increased with the advancement of the time, there has been an increasing stress on healthcare with the aging diet, and pressure sores occur in elderly hospitalized subjects. Of course, the emergence of related medical devices, especially auxiliary foam dressings, is constantly improving. Pressure ulcers are extremely harmful to the elderly. The use of virtual reality technology to simulate the treatment of foam excipients is to test the role of medical devices in virtual reality. In particular, the use of foam dressings in the management of pressure deposits is the most relevant study for this paper, which reviews the relevant literature and conducts a thematic study on patients in a specific urban hospital. The relevant materials were designed, the experiments were designed, and the relevant research data were obtained. Studies show that virtual reality-based preventive medical devices can improve the efficiency of pressure ulcer treatment in hospitals by about 12%. Pressure ulcers have different incidences among people of different ages. The probability is much higher than that of adolescents. Foam dressing is very effective in preventing pressure ulcers. The probability of pressure ulcers after using foam dressing is about 35% lower than that when it is not used.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34795884 PMCID: PMC8594979 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6389001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Distribution of patients.
| Vertical pressure | Friction | Shear force | Partial loss of moisture | Malnutrition | Other illnesses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–12 | 13 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 2 |
| 13–26 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 27–45 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 16 | 6 | 7 |
| 46–60 | 30 | 21 | 17 | 15 | 13 | 9 |
| Over 60 | 37 | 42 | 51 | 21 | 19 | 15 |
Figure 1Distribution of patients.
Patient index comparison.
| Intervention group | Control group | Normal person |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body temperature | 36.31 ± 0.36 | 36.53 ± 0.22 | 37.23 ± 0.22 | −0.448 | 0.454 |
| Pulse | 71.48 ± 7.29 | 71.38 ± 7.02 | 72.26 ± 7.12 | 0.883 | 0.379 |
| Breathe | 12.78 ± 2.08 | 12.32 ± 1.82 | 13.12 ± 1.82 | 1.352 | 0.179 |
| SpO2 (%) | 92.24 ± 0.80 | 91.86 ± 1.68 | 91.96 ± 1.74 | 1.659 | 0.100 |
| NRS | 2.08 ± 0.35 | 1.98 ± 0.42 | 2.12 ± 0.62 | 1.052 | 0.295 |
Comparison of intraoperative conditions of patients.
| Intervention group | Control group | Normal person |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bleeding volume | 32.65 ± 8.25 | 35.42 ± 9.42 | 36.13 ± 0.12 | −1.602 | 0.111 |
| Total operation time | 5.95 ± 0.85 | 5.95 ± 0.85 | 7.16 ± 0.52 | −2.342 | 0.021 |
| Total time of posture | 22.42 ± 3.51 | 23.84 ± 4.08 | 23.72 ± 3.82 | −2.143 | 0.034 |
Figure 2Different types of pressure ulcers.
Figure 3Effect picture of pressure sore.
Treatment methods.
| Regular posture changes | Special mattress decompression | Adequate nutrient intake | Antibiotics | Foam dressing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage I pressure ulcer | 13 | 29 | 47 | 31 | 21 |
| Stage II pressure ulcer | 9 | 21 | 51 | 26 | 13 |
| Stage III pressure ulcer | 6 | 54 | 23 | 47 | 29 |
| Stage IV pressure ulcer | 5 | 19 | 27 | 29 | 35 |
| Nonstage pressure ulcers | 2 | 16 | 19 | 26 | 32 |
Figure 4Number of people with pressure ulcers treated by different methods.
Treatment effect of radius fracture.
| Stability | High fever | Swelling of the skin | Pain | Wound healing | Treatment costs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular posture changes | 0.537 | 0.887 | 0.528 | 0.718 | 0.642 | 0.516 |
| Special mattress decompression | 0.431 | 0.573 | 0.431 | 0.752 | 0.669 | 0.678 |
| Adequate nutrient intake | 0.479 | 0.526 | 0.888 | 0.697 | 0.477 | 0.617 |
| Antibiotics | 0.539 | 0.643 | 0.542 | 0.573 | 0.681 | 0.854 |
| Foam dressing | 0.879 | 0.735 | 0.779 | 0.727 | 0.813 | 0.595 |
Figure 5Treatment effect of different methods.
Prognostic care effect.
| Stability | High fever | Swelling of the skin | Pain | Wound healing | Treatment costs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular posture changes | 0.478 | 0.817 | 0.559 | 0.697 | 0.679 | 0.542 |
| Special mattress decompression | 0.431 | 0.573 | 0.431 | 0.752 | 0.669 | 0.678 |
| Adequate nutrient intake | 0.479 | 0.526 | 0.823 | 0.697 | 0.435 | 0.617 |
| Antibiotics | 0.539 | 0.643 | 0.556 | 0.573 | 0.681 | 0.854 |
| Foam dressing | 0.842 | 0.798 | 0.697 | 0.735 | 0.826 | 0.789 |
Figure 6Prognostic treatment score.