| Literature DB >> 34795793 |
JinChi Zheng1, XiaoLan Wei2, JinYi Wang1, HuaSong Lin3, HongRun Pan4, YuQing Shi4.
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a brain disease that frequently occurs in young people. Early diagnosis and treatment can reduce family burdens and reduce social costs. There is no objective evaluation index for schizophrenia. In order to improve the classification effect of traditional classification methods on magnetic resonance data, a method of classification of functional magnetic resonance imaging data is proposed in conjunction with the convolutional neural network algorithm. We take functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data for schizophrenia as an example, to extract effective time series from preprocessed fMRI data, and perform correlation analysis on regions of interest, using transfer learning and VGG16 net, and the functional connection between schizophrenia and healthy controls is classified. Experimental results show that the classification accuracy of fMRI based on VGG16 is up to 84.3%. On the one hand, it can improve the early diagnosis of schizophrenia, and on the other hand, it can solve the classification problem of small samples and high-dimensional data and effectively improve the generalization ability of deep learning models.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34795793 PMCID: PMC8594998 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8437260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Convolutional neural network structure.
Figure 2VGG16 structure.
Figure 3Feature visualization.
Figure 4The improved VGG16 schizophrenia classification model.
Figure 5Transfer learning training process.
Participant information.
| Category | Healthy | Sick |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 102 | 98 | |
| Average age (standard deviation) | 36.85 (11.86) | 37.46 (12.99) | 0.55 |
| Gender (male/female) | 55/47 | 59/39 |
Figure 6Data preprocessing process.
Confusion matrix.
| Data type | Predicted positive class | Predicted negative class |
|---|---|---|
| Actual positive class | TP | FN |
| Actual negative class | FP | TN |
Comparison of effects of different models.
| Different models | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlexNet | 78.36% | 81.29% | 75.66% | 0.76 |
| VGG16 | 85.27% | 86.33% | 87.48% | 0.83 |
| ResNet | 83.09% | 86.59% | 79.98% | 0.81 |
| Our model | 87.58% | 87.11% | 89.63% | 0.85 |
Figure 7The ROC curves of the four models.