| Literature DB >> 34795787 |
Qianyan Wu1,2, Qingyuan Zhang1,2, Yong Li3, Letian Yu1, Ying Zhang2, Meiying Ao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure is the main critical illness and cause of death in the later stages of cardiovascular disease, and it is one of the two major challenges in the field of cardiovascular research. The clinical application of traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of chronic heart failure has been relatively common in China, and the "Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine" has been published in China. Combining the literature in this field, the authors found that Zhigancao Decoction has been used in the treatment of chronic heart failure with more clinical research reports and higher frequency (this article refers to it as a high-frequency prescription for short). However, Zhigancao Decoction was not included in the recommended prescriptions in the "Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine," and there was no relevant systematic review and meta-analysis. For this reason, this article has carried out two parts of work, including systematically organizing the literature in this research field and carrying out systematic review and meta-analysis. This can provide stronger evidence support for Zhigancao Decoction combined with conventional Western medicine in the treatment of chronic heart failure and provide a new option for the improvement and update of the "Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine."Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34795787 PMCID: PMC8595005 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7140044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of chronic heart failure.
| No. | Prescription | Number of articles in CNKI and PubMed | Is there a systematic review and meta-analysis report | Quantity | Most recently reported year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zhenwu Decoction | 557 | Yes | 7 | 2020 |
| 2 | Zhigancao Decoction | 408 | No | 0 | — |
| 3 | Wuling Powder | 359 | Yes | 4 | 2020 |
| 4 | Shengmai San | 190 | Yes | 2 | 2019 |
| 5 | Buyang Huanwu Decoction | 154 | Yes | 1 | 2020 |
| 6 | Heart Nourishing Decoction | 139 | No | 0 | — |
| 7 | Fangji fuling Decoction | 120 | No | 0 | — |
| 8 | Shenfu Decoction | 102 | No | 0 | — |
| 9 | Erchen Decoction | 98 | No | 0 | — |
| 10 | Sini soup | 82 | Yes | 6 | 2020 |
| 11 | Bao Yuan soup | 47 | No | 0 | — |
| 12 | Mu-Fang-Ji Tang | 47 | No | 0 | — |
| 13 | Jinkui Shenqi Pills | 46 | No | 0 | — |
| 14 | Huanglian Wendan Decoction | 43 | No | 0 | — |
| 15 | Sanzi Yangqintang | 41 | No | 0 | — |
| 16 | Ramuli Cinnamomi and Glycyrrhizae Decoction | 38 | No | 0 | — |
| 17 | Fangji Huangqi Decoction | 35 | No | 0 | — |
| 18 | Tingli Dazao Xiefei Decoction | 33 | No | 0 | — |
| 19 | Minor Chest-Draining Decoction | 20 | No | 0 | — |
| 20 | Shenfu Longmu soup | 9 | No | 0 | — |
| 21 | Qingfei Huatan Decoction | 2 | No | 0 | — |
Figure 1Metrological histogram of research reports on the treatment of chronic heart failure with Chinese medicine prescriptions.
Figure 2Flow chart of research literature selection.
Basic characteristics of the included research literature.
| Study or subgroup | Sample (T/C) | Age | Prescription | Course of treatment | Outcome indicators | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | C | T | ||||
| Yan 2016 [ | 21/21 | 72.5 ± 5.3 | 70.5 ± 5.4 | Digoxin tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | 24 w | ①②③ |
| Li et al. 2014 [ | 160/152 | 52–81, mean 60.2 | 51–82, mean 60.6 | Amiodarone hydrochloride tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | 4 w | ① |
| Liu 2016 [ | 30/30 | 75 ± 5 | 72 ± 3 | Digoxin tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | 6 w | ① |
| Ao et al. 2010 [ | 60/60 | 72 ± 10 | 72 ± 10 | Digoxin tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | 4 w | ①②③ |
| Zhang 2016 [ | 44/44 | 70.69 ± 3.25 | 70.69 ± 3.23 | Digoxin tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | 4 w | ① |
| Wang 2016 [ | 60/60 | 64.2 ± 12.0 | 66.9 ± 11.9 | Hydrochlorothiazide, enalapril, digoxin tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | 45 d | ③ |
| Yang et al. 2011 [ | 45/45 | 57–84, mean 69 | 57–84, mean 69 | Oxygen inhalation, digoxin, furosemide, dihydrocurethiazide, spironolactone, enalapril, isosorbide, betaloc | Add Zhigancao soup | 12 w | ①③⑤ |
| Jiang 2018 [ | 43/43 | 58.5 ± 1.5 | 61.5 ± 2.5 | Betaloc, isosorbide, enalapril, spironolactone, furosemide, digoxin, oxygen inhalation | Add Zhigancao soup | 4 w | ③⑤ |
| Liang et al. 2013 [ | 39/39 | 55–82, mean 68 | 55–82, mean 68 | Betaloc, isolator, enalapril, spironolactone, dihydrocurethiazide, furosemide, digoxin, oxygen inhalation | Add Zhigancao soup | 12 w | ①③⑤ |
| Wang 2018 [ | 105/105 | 61.4 ± 2.9 | 62.8 ± 3.1 | Metoprolol | Add Zhigancao soup | 12 w | ①③ |
| Li 2020 [ | 25/25 | 50–80 | 50–79 | Metoprolol tartrate tablets, sacubitril, and valsartan sodium tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | Unmentioned | ①④⑤ |
| Li 2018 [ | 47/47 | 60.31 ± 7.62 | 60.44 ± 7.71 | Betaloc, digosine tablets, sacubitril and Valsartan sodium tablets, spironolactone tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | 2 w | ①④⑤ |
| Sun 2020 [ | 41/41 | 65.82 ± 14.92 | 64.36 ± 15.92 | Furosemide tablets, perindopril tert-butylamine tablets, metoprolol tartrate tablets, digoxin tablets, aspirin enteric-coated tablets, simvastatin tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | Unmentioned | ②③④ |
| Sun 2019 [ | 57/57 | 58.64 ± 6.21 | 57.68 ± 6.13 | Vasartan | Add Zhigancao soup | 12 w | ①②③ |
| Lin 2004 [ | 40/20 | 61–76 | 60–78 | Routine treatment for oxygen inhalation, heart strengthening, diuresis, and circulation improvement | Add Zhigancao soup | Unmentioned | ① |
| Zhao et al. 2019 [ | 35/35 | 54.31 ± 3.82 | 54.25 ± 3.56 | Routine treatments such as diuretics, angiotensin receptor antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, | Add Zhigancao soup | 4 w | ①③④ |
| Wu et al. 2019 [ | 38/38 | 55.27 ± 2.63 | 55.38 ± 2.54 | Digoxin, metoprolol tartrate tablets, hakubatril, and valsartan sodium tablets | Add Zhigancao soup | Unmentioned | ①②③④ |
Note. T/C: test group/control group; ①: total clinical effective rate; ②: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; ③: left ventricular ejection fraction; ④: B-type natriuretic peptide; ⑤: 6 minutes of walking distance.
Quality evaluation of included studies.
| Study or subgroup | Random method | Randomized hiding | Blinding | Lost to follow-up/exit | Jadad score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yan 2016 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Li et al. 2014 [ | Random number table | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 2 |
| Liu 2016 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Ao et al. 2010 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Zhang 2016 [ | Simple random method | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 2 |
| Wang 2016 [ | Simple random method | Disease sign group | Not mentioned | No dropout cases | 3 |
| Yang et al. 2011 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Jiang 2018 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Liang et al. 2013 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Wang 2018 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Li 2020 [ | Odd and even number random method | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 2 |
| Li 2018 [ | Random number table | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 2 |
| Sun 2020 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Sun 2019 [ | Random number table | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 2 |
| Lin 2004 [ | Unknown | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 1 |
| Zhao et al. 2019 [ | Two-color ball random method | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 2 |
| Wu et al. 2019 [ | Random number table | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 2 |
Figure 3The distribution of the risk of bias in the included research literature.
Figure 4The bias of the included research literature.
Figure 5Forest plot of the total clinical effective rate.
Figure 6Forest plot of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Figure 7Forest plot of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd).
Figure 8Forest plot of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP).
Figure 9Forest plot of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
Figure 10Sensitivity analysis graph of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Figure 11Sensitivity analysis chart of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd).
Figure 12Sensitivity analysis diagram of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP).
Figure 13Sensitivity analysis diagram of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
Figure 14Funnel diagram of the total clinical effectiveness of publication.
Figure 15Funnel diagram of the bias of the publication about the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
The occurrence of adverse reactions.
| Study or subgroup | Occurrence of adverse reactions | Adverse reaction rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | T | C | |
| Sun 2020 [ | 3 cases of nausea and vomiting, 1 case of diarrhea, 1 case of headache, 1 case of rash | 2 cases of nausea and vomiting, 1 case of diarrhea, 1 case of headache | 14.63% | 9.76% |
| Zhao et al. 2019 [ | 2 cases of nausea and vomiting, 1 case of diarrhea | 2 cases of nausea and vomiting, 1 case of abdominal pain, 1 case of dizziness | 8.57% | 11.43% |