Literature DB >> 34794592

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Epigastric Pain.

Abhinav Vij1, Atif Zaheer2, Ihab R Kamel3, Kristin K Porter4, Hina Arif-Tiwari5, Mustafa R Bashir6, Alice Fung7, Alan Goldstein8, Keith D Herr9, Aya Kamaya10, Mariya Kobi11, Matthew P Landler12, Gregory K Russo13, Kiran H Thakrar14, Michael A Turturro15, Shaun A Wahab16, Richard M Wardrop17, Chadwick L Wright18, Xihua Yang19, Laura R Carucci20.   

Abstract

Epigastric pain can have multiple etiologies including myocardial infarction, pancreatitis, acute aortic syndromes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and hiatal hernia. This document focuses on the scenarios in which epigastric pain is accompanied by symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and hematemesis, which raise suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or hiatal hernia. Although endoscopy may be the test of choice for diagnosing these entities, patients may present with nonspecific or overlapping symptoms, necessitating the use of imaging prior to or instead of endoscopy. The utility of fluoroscopic imaging, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET for these indications are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Acid reflux; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; CT; Esophagitis; Fluoroscopy; Gastric cancer; Hiatal hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34794592     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  1 in total

1.  Image quality of abdominal ultrasonography after esophagogastroduodenoscopy is preserved by using carbon dioxide insufflation: A non-inferiority test in the same subject.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Suda; Yukihiro Shirota; Hiroaki Takimoto; Yasunori Tsukada; Kensaku Takishita; Takahiro Nadamura; Masaki Miyazawa; Yuji Hodo; Tokio Wakabayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.