Andrews K Tawiah1, François Desmeules2, Laura Finucane3, Jeremy Lewis4, Marguerite Wieler1, Emma Stokes5, Linda J Woodhouse6. 1. Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada. 2. School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Canada. 3. Sussex MSK Partnership, United Kingdom. 4. School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Therapy Department, Central London Community Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. 5. Department of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; World Physiotherapy, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: estokes@tcd.ie. 6. Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada; School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Advanced practice in physiotherapy represents a development in the practice of physiotherapy and has developed in different ways around the world. There is growing evidence to support advanced physiotherapy practice. In May 2019, the member organisations adopted the first World Physiotherapy policy on advanced practice in physiotherapy. However, to date, there is no evidence on the nature and extent of this practice globally. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent to which advanced practice is present within the global physiotherapy community, to document the titles used, to describe the pathway to become an advanced physiotherapy practitioner and to investigate the barriers and facilitators to the development of the roles. DESIGN: An online cross-sectional survey was sent to the various national associations of the World Physiotherapy. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were the member organisations of World Physiotherapy. INSTRUMENT: The survey comprised 14 questions. The questions were developed based on a review of the evidence around advanced practice and in-depth discussions with the expert group set up by World Physiotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 82/112 MOs responded to the survey representing a 73% response rate. Fourteen respondents (14/82, 17%) indicated that they had formal roles in their country/territory. The terms specialist and advanced physiotherapy practitioner were often used interchangeably and were a source of confusion. Seventy-nine (11/14, 79%) percent stated that most advanced physiotherapy practitioners have a combination of clinical practice and a Master's or Doctoral degree. The major facilitators to the development and sustainability of the role were the research evidence, advocacy by the professional organisation, the need to reduce cost and the support received by the advanced physiotherapy practitioners from their employers. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of this study provide a clearer understanding of how member organisations of World Physiotherapy defined advanced practice in physiotherapy and what titles are used. It provides insights into the barriers and facilitators to the development of advanced practice in physiotherapy.
INTRODUCTION: Advanced practice in physiotherapy represents a development in the practice of physiotherapy and has developed in different ways around the world. There is growing evidence to support advanced physiotherapy practice. In May 2019, the member organisations adopted the first World Physiotherapy policy on advanced practice in physiotherapy. However, to date, there is no evidence on the nature and extent of this practice globally. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent to which advanced practice is present within the global physiotherapy community, to document the titles used, to describe the pathway to become an advanced physiotherapy practitioner and to investigate the barriers and facilitators to the development of the roles. DESIGN: An online cross-sectional survey was sent to the various national associations of the World Physiotherapy. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were the member organisations of World Physiotherapy. INSTRUMENT: The survey comprised 14 questions. The questions were developed based on a review of the evidence around advanced practice and in-depth discussions with the expert group set up by World Physiotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 82/112 MOs responded to the survey representing a 73% response rate. Fourteen respondents (14/82, 17%) indicated that they had formal roles in their country/territory. The terms specialist and advanced physiotherapy practitioner were often used interchangeably and were a source of confusion. Seventy-nine (11/14, 79%) percent stated that most advanced physiotherapy practitioners have a combination of clinical practice and a Master's or Doctoral degree. The major facilitators to the development and sustainability of the role were the research evidence, advocacy by the professional organisation, the need to reduce cost and the support received by the advanced physiotherapy practitioners from their employers. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of this study provide a clearer understanding of how member organisations of World Physiotherapy defined advanced practice in physiotherapy and what titles are used. It provides insights into the barriers and facilitators to the development of advanced practice in physiotherapy.