Literature DB >> 34794066

A genome-wide search for determinants of survival in 1926 patients with advanced colorectal cancer with follow-up in over 22,000 patients.

Christopher Wills1, Yazhou He2, Matthew G Summers1, Yi Lin3, Amanda I Phipps3, Katie Watts1, Philip J Law4, Nada A Al-Tassan5, Timothy S Maughan6, Richard Kaplan7, Richard S Houlston4, Ulrike Peters3, Polly A Newcomb3, Andrew T Chan8, Daniel D Buchanan9, Steve Gallinger10, Loic L Marchand11, Rish K Pai12, Qian Shi13, Steven R Alberts14, Victoria Gray1, Hannah D West1, Valentina Escott-Price15, Malcolm G Dunlop16, Jeremy P Cheadle17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified germline variants influencing the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), there has been limited examination of the possible role of inherited variation as a determinant of patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a GWAS for overall survival (OS) in 1926 patients with advanced CRC from the COIN and COIN-B clinical trials. For single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) showing an association with OS (P < 1.0 × 10-5), we conducted sensitivity analyses based on the time from diagnosis to death and sought independent replications in 5675 patients from the Study of Colorectal Cancer in Scotland (SOCCS) and 16,964 patients from the International Survival Analysis in Colorectal cancer Consortium (ISACC). We analysed the Human Protein Atlas to determine if ERBB4 expression was associated with survival in 438 patients with colon adenocarcinomas.
RESULTS: The most significant SNP associated with OS was rs79612564 in ERBB4 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.32, P = 1.9 × 10-7). SNPs at 17 loci had suggestive associations for OS and all had similar effects on the time from diagnosis to death. No lead SNPs were independently replicated in the meta-analysis of all patients from SOCCS and ISACC. However, rs79612564 was significant in stage-IV patients from SOCCS (P = 2.1 × 10-2) but not ISACC (P = 0.89) and SOCCS combined with COIN and COIN-B attained genome-wide significance (P = 1.7 × 10-8). Patients with high ERBB4 expression in their colon adenocarcinomas had worse survival (HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.1-1.9, P = 4.6 × 10-2).
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic and expression data support a potential role for rs79612564 in the receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB4 as a predictive biomarker of survival.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; GWAS; Prognostic biomarkers; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34794066      PMCID: PMC9132154          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   10.002


  48 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Tumor thymidylate synthase 1494del6 genotype as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients receiving fluorouracil-based adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Emma Dotor; Miriam Cuatrecases; María Martínez-Iniesta; Matilde Navarro; Felip Vilardell; Elisabeth Guinó; Laura Pareja; Agnés Figueras; David G Molleví; Teresa Serrano; Javier de Oca; Miguel A Peinado; Víctor Moreno; Josep Ramón Germà; Gabriel Capellá; Alberto Villanueva
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Genetic susceptibility variants associated with colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Anna Abulí; Juan José Lozano; María Rodríguez-Soler; Rodrigo Jover; Xavier Bessa; Jenifer Muñoz; Clara Esteban-Jurado; Ceres Fernández-Rozadilla; Angel Carracedo; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Joaquín Cubiella; Francesc Balaguer; Luis Bujanda; Josep M Reñé; Juan Clofent; Juan Diego Morillas; David Nicolás-Pérez; Rosa M Xicola; Xavier Llor; Josep M Piqué; Montserrat Andreu; Antoni Castells; Sergi Castellví-Bel
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 5.  Genetic prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Axel Walther; Elaine Johnstone; Charles Swanton; Rachel Midgley; Ian Tomlinson; David Kerr
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Genotype imputation with thousands of genomes.

Authors:  Bryan Howie; Jonathan Marchini; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  A global reference for human genetic variation.

Authors:  Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Erik P Garrison; Hyun Min Kang; Jan O Korbel; Jonathan L Marchini; Shane McCarthy; Gil A McVean; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Effects of common genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer risk on survival outcomes after diagnosis: A large population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Yazhou He; Evropi Theodoratou; Xue Li; Farhat V N Din; Peter Vaughan-Shaw; Victoria Svinti; Susan M Farrington; Harry Campbell; Malcolm G Dunlop; Maria Timofeeva
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  A guide to best practices for Gene Ontology (GO) manual annotation.

Authors:  Rama Balakrishnan; Midori A Harris; Rachael Huntley; Kimberly Van Auken; J Michael Cherry
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Harpreet Wasan; Angela M Meade; Richard Adams; Richard Wilson; Cheryl Pugh; David Fisher; Benjamin Sydes; Ayman Madi; Bruce Sizer; Charles Lowdell; Gary Middleton; Rachel Butler; Richard Kaplan; Tim Maughan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Use of Omics Technologies for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers.

Authors:  Marina Alorda-Clara; Margalida Torrens-Mas; Pere Miquel Morla-Barcelo; Toni Martinez-Bernabe; Jorge Sastre-Serra; Pilar Roca; Daniel Gabriel Pons; Jordi Oliver; Jose Reyes
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.