Literature DB >> 34793719

Evorpacept alone and in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab in patients with advanced solid tumours (ASPEN-01): a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study.

Nehal J Lakhani1, Laura Q M Chow2, Justin F Gainor3, Patricia LoRusso4, Keun-Wook Lee5, Hyun Cheol Chung6, Jeeyun Lee7, Yung-Jue Bang8, Frank Stephen Hodi9, Won Seog Kim7, Rafael Santana-Davila10, Philip Fanning11, Pierre Squifflet12, Feng Jin11, Tracy C Kuo11, Hong I Wan11, Jaume Pons11, Sophia S Randolph13, Wells A Messersmith14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both innate and adaptive immune responses are important components of anticancer immunity. The CD47-SIRPα interaction could represent an important pathway used by tumour cells to evade immune surveillance. We aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and anticancer activity of evorpacept (also known as ALX148), a high-affinity CD47-blocking protein with an inactive IgG Fc region in patients with solid tumours.
METHODS: We did a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study at nine hospitals and one clinic in the USA and Korea. Eligible patients for the dose-escalation and safety lead-in phases were aged 18 years or older with histological or cytological diagnosis of advanced or metastatic solid tumours with no available standard therapy, measurable or unmeasurable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. In the dose-escalation phase, which used a 3 + 3 design, patients received intravenous evorpacept at either 0·3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg once per week in 21-day cycles, or 30 mg/kg once every other week in 28-day cycles. In the safety lead-in phase, patients were given the maximum tolerable dose of evorpacept from the dose-escalation phase plus either intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg administered once every 3 weeks) or intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks). In the dose-expansion phase, additional patients aged 18 years or older with second-line or later-line advanced malignancies were enrolled into three parallel cohorts: those with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and those with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were given the maximum tolerated dose of evorpacept plus intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg administered once every 3 weeks), and patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer were given the maximum tolerated dose of evorpacept plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) until disease progression, voluntary withdrawal from the study, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose of evorpacept administered as a single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab, measured by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle, and was assessed in all patients who had received at least one dose of evorpacept. Secondary outcomes included the safety, tolerability, and antitumour activity of evorpacept, alone or in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab. The primary outcome, safety, and tolerability were assessed in all patients who had received at least one dose of evorpacept, and antitumour activity was assessed in those who recieved at least one dose of study treatment and underwent at least one post-baseline tumor assessment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03013218.
FINDINGS: Between March 6, 2017, and Feb 21, 2019, 110 patients received single-agent evorpacept (n=28), evorpacept plus pembrolizumab (n=52), or evorpacept plus trastuzumab (n=30), and were included in the safety analysis. Median follow-up was 29·1 months (95% CI not calculable [NC]-NC) in the single-agent cohort, 27·0 months (25·1-28·8) in the evorpacept plus pembrolizumab cohort, and 32·7 months (27·0-32·7) in the evorpacept plus trastuzumab cohort. Two (7%) dose-limiting toxicities in the first cycle were reported in patients who received single-agent evorpacept; neutropenia with an associated infection in one patient with gastroesophageal junction cancer who received 3 mg/kg once per week, and thrombocytopenia with associated bleeding in one patient with pancreatic cancer who received 30 mg/kg once every other week. No maximum tolerated dose was reached; the maximum administered doses were 10 mg/kg once per week or 30 mg/kg once every other week. The 10 mg/kg once per week dose was used in the expansion cohorts in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia with single-agent evorpacept (two [7%] patients) and evorpacept plus pembrolizumab (two [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (two [7%]) and neutropenia (two [7%]) with evorpacept plus trastuzumab. In patients who received single-agent evorpacept, four treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Five serious treatment-related adverse events related to evorpacept plus pembrolizumab were reported, and one serious adverse event related to evorpacept plus trastuzumab was reported. In response-evaluable patients in the dose-escalation phase (n=15) receiving single-agent evorpacept once per week, four (27%) had a best overall response of stable disease (two received 0·3 mg/kg, one received 3 mg/kg, and one received 10 mg/kg); in the 11 patients who received single-agent evorpacept at the highest dose of 30 mg/kg once every other week, two (18%) had stable disease. In the dose-expansion cohort, overall responses were recorded in four (20·0%; 95% CI 5·7-43·7) of 20 patients with HNSCC who received evorpacept plus pembrolizumab, in one (5·0%; 0·1-24·9) of 20 patients with NSCLC who received evorpacept plus pembrolizumab, and in four (21·1%; 6·1-45·6) of 19 patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer who received evorpacept plus trastuzumab.
INTERPRETATION: The safety findings support the use of evorpacept in combination with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab for patients with advanced solid tumours. Preliminary antitumour activity results support future investigation of evorpacept combined with pembrolizumab or trastuzumab in patients with HNSCC, gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, and NSCLC. FUNDING: ALX Oncology.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34793719     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00584-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  10 in total

Review 1.  CD47/SIRPα axis: bridging innate and adaptive immunity.

Authors:  Anneloes van Duijn; Sjoerd H Van der Burg; Ferenc A Scheeren
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 12.469

Review 2.  Circulating inflammatory cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Implications for treatment.

Authors:  Caterina Gianni; Michela Palleschi; Giuseppe Schepisi; Chiara Casadei; Sara Bleve; Filippo Merloni; Marianna Sirico; Samanta Sarti; Lorenzo Cecconetto; Giandomenico Di Menna; Francesco Schettini; Ugo De Giorgi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Yasmin Abaza; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  Tristetraprolin regulates phagocytosis through interaction with CD47 in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Won Hyeok Lee; Song Hee Kim; Jae Hee An; Tae-Koon Kim; Hee Jeong Cha; Hyo Won Chang; Sang Yoon Kim; Seong Who Kim; Myung Woul Han
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.751

Review 5.  Targeting the CD47-SIRPα Innate Immune Checkpoint to Potentiate Antibody Therapy in Cancer by Neutrophils.

Authors:  Leonie M Behrens; Timo K van den Berg; Marjolein van Egmond
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  CD47-SIRPα blocking-based immunotherapy: Current and prospective therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Renée Bouwstra; Tom van Meerten; Edwin Bremer
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-08

Review 7.  Emerging strategies in targeting tumor-resident myeloid cells for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Kai Conrad Cecil Johnson; Margaret E Gatti-Mays; Zihai Li
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 23.168

8.  The Generation of Dual-Targeting Fusion Protein PD-L1/CD47 for the Inhibition of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yanlin Bian; Tong Lin; Tanja Jakos; Xiaodong Xiao; Jianwei Zhu
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-30

Review 9.  Therapeutic targets and biomarkers of tumor immunotherapy: response versus non-response.

Authors:  Dong-Rui Wang; Xian-Lin Wu; Ying-Li Sun
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-09-19

10.  CD47KO/CRT dual-bioengineered cell membrane-coated nanovaccine combined with anti-PD-L1 antibody for boosting tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Shengyang Liu; Jiayan Wu; Yuanji Feng; Xiaoya Guo; Tong Li; Meng Meng; Jie Chen; Daquan Chen; Huayu Tian
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-10-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.