Literature DB >> 34793718

177Lu-Dotatate plus long-acting octreotide versus high‑dose long-acting octreotide in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-1): final overall survival and long-term safety results from an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Jonathan R Strosberg1, Martyn E Caplin2, Pamela L Kunz3, Philippe B Ruszniewski4, Lisa Bodei5, Andrew Hendifar6, Erik Mittra7, Edward M Wolin8, James C Yao9, Marianne E Pavel10, Enrique Grande11, Eric Van Cutsem12, Ettore Seregni13, Hugo Duarte14, Germo Gericke15, Amy Bartalotta16, Maurizio F Mariani15, Arnaud Demange15, Sakir Mutevelic15, Eric P Krenning17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary analysis of the phase 3 NETTER-1 trial showed significant improvement in progression-free survival with 177Lu-Dotatate plus long-acting octreotide versus high-dose long-acting octreotide alone in patients with advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumours. Here, we report the prespecified final analysis of overall survival and long-term safety results.
METHODS: This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial enrolled patients from 41 sites in eight countries across Europe and the USA. Patients were 18 years and older with locally advanced or metastatic, well differentiated, somatostatin receptor-positive midgut neuroendocrine tumours (Karnofsky performance status score ≥60) and disease progression on fixed-dose long-acting octreotide. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web-based response system to intravenous 177Lu-Dotatate 7·4 GBq (200 mCi) every 8 weeks (four cycles) plus intramuscular long-acting octreotide 30 mg (177Lu-Dotatate group) or high-dose long-acting octreotide 60 mg every 4 weeks (control group). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival has been previously reported; here, we report the key secondary endpoint of overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Final overall survival analysis was prespecified to occur either after 158 deaths or 5 years after the last patient was randomised, whichever occurred first. During long-term follow-up, adverse events of special interest were reported in the 177Lu-Dotatate group only. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01578239.
FINDINGS: From Sept 6, 2012, to Jan 14, 2016, 231 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned for treatment. The prespecified final analysis occurred 5 years after the last patient was randomly assigned (when 142 deaths had occurred); median follow-up was 76·3 months (range 0·4-95·0) in the 177Lu-Dotatate group and 76·5 months (0·1-92·3) in the control group. The secondary endpoint of overall survival was not met: median overall survival was 48·0 months (95% CI 37·4-55·2) in the 177Lu-Dotatate group and 36·3 months (25·9-51·7) in the control group (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·60-1·17]; two-sided p=0·30). During long-term follow-up, treatment-related serious adverse events of grade 3 or worse were recorded in three (3%) of 111 patients in the 177Lu-Dotatate group, but no new treatment-related serious adverse events were reported after the safety analysis cutoff. Two (2%) of 111 patients given 177Lu-Dotatate developed myelodysplastic syndrome, one of whom died 33 months after randomisation (this person was the only the only reported 177Lu-Dotatate treatment-related death). No new cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia were reported during long-term follow-up.
INTERPRETATION: 177Lu-Dotatate treatment did not significantly improve median overall survival versus high-dose long-acting octreotide. Despite final overall survival not reaching statistical significance, the 11·7 month difference in median overall survival with 177Lu-Dotatate treatment versus high-dose long-acting octreotide alone might be considered clinically relevant. No new safety signals were reported during long-term follow-up. FUNDING: Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis company.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34793718     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00572-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  30 in total

1.  Utility of PET Scans in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Tumors.

Authors:  Nandakumar Menon; Mark Mandelkern
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 2.  Role of Radioembolization in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Robert J Lewandowski; Beau B Toskich; Daniel B Brown; Ghassan El-Haddad; Siddharth A Padia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 3.  Radioligand therapy (RLT) as neoadjuvant treatment for inoperable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a literature review.

Authors:  Luca Urso; Alberto Nieri; Ilaria Rambaldi; Angelo Castello; Licia Uccelli; Corrado Cittanti; Stefano Panareo; Irene Gagliardi; Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Mirco Bartolomei
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.925

Review 4.  Towards updated understanding of brain metastasis.

Authors:  Shuncong Wang; Yuanbo Feng; Lei Chen; Jie Yu; Chantal Van Ongeval; Guy Bormans; Yue Li; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.942

Review 5.  Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities.

Authors:  Lisa Bodei; Ken Herrmann; Heiko Schöder; Andrew M Scott; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 65.011

Review 6.  Neuroendocrine Tumors and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: When Is the Right Time?

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Marianne Pavel; Emily K Bergsland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 50.717

7.  Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise.

Authors:  Mirco Bartolomei; Alfredo Berruti; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Diego Ferone; Secondo Lastoria; Giovanni Pappagallo; Ettore Seregni; Annibale Versari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Comparison of Choi, RECIST and Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT Based Criteria for the Evaluation of Response and Response Prediction to PRRT.

Authors:  Kevin Zwirtz; Juliane Hardt; Güliz Acker; Alexander D J Baur; Marianne Pavel; Kai Huang; Winfried Brenner; Vikas Prasad
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.525

9.  Relationship between somatostatin receptor expressing tumour volume and health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic GEP-NET.

Authors:  Håkan Ohlsson; Anni Gålne; Elin Trägårdh; Marlene Malmström; Anna Sundlöv; Martin Almquist
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.870

Review 10.  Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors in Older Patients: Current Status and Potential Therapies.

Authors:  Christiana Crook; Ya-Han Zhang; Daneng Li
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.