Literature DB >> 34793440

A first assessment of the distribution and abundance of large pelagic species at Cocos Ridge seamounts (Eastern Tropical Pacific) using drifting pelagic baited remote cameras.

Marta Cambra1,2, Frida Lara-Lizardi3,4, César Peñaherrera-Palma3, Alex Hearn3,5, James T Ketchum3,4,6, Patricia Zarate3,7, Carlos Chacón8, Jenifer Suárez-Moncada9, Esteban Herrera10, Mario Espinoza2,3,11.   

Abstract

Understanding the link between seamounts and large pelagic species (LPS) may provide important insights for the conservation of these species in open water ecosystems. The seamounts along the Cocos Ridge in the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP) ocean are thought to be ecologically important aggregation sites for LPS when moving between Cocos Island (Costa Rica) and Galapagos Islands (Ecuador). However, to date, research efforts to quantify the abundance and distribution patterns of LPS beyond the borders of these two oceanic Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) have been limited. This study used drifting-pelagic baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) to investigate the distribution and relative abundance of LPS at Cocos Ridge seamounts. Our drifting-pelagic BRUVS recorded a total of 21 species including elasmobranchs, small and large teleosts, dolphins and one sea turtle; of which four species are currently threatened. Depth of seamount summit was the most significant driver for LPS richness and abundance which were significantly higher at shallow seamounts (< 400 m) compared to deeper ones (> 400m). Distance to nearest MPA was also a significant predictor for LPS abundance, which increased at increasing distances from the nearest MPA. Our results suggest that the Cocos Ridge seamounts, specifically Paramount and West Cocos which had the highest LPS richness and abundance, are important aggregation sites for LPS in the ETP. However, further research is still needed to demonstrate a positive association between LPS and Cocos Ridge seamounts. Our findings showed that drifting pelagic BRUVS are an effective tool to survey LPS in fully pelagic ecosystems of the ETP. This study represents the first step towards the standardization of this technique throughout the region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34793440      PMCID: PMC8601560          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  26 in total

1.  Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities.

Authors:  Ransom A Myers; Boris Worm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features.

Authors:  Graham J Edgar; Rick D Stuart-Smith; Trevor J Willis; Stuart Kininmonth; Susan C Baker; Stuart Banks; Neville S Barrett; Mikel A Becerro; Anthony T F Bernard; Just Berkhout; Colin D Buxton; Stuart J Campbell; Antonia T Cooper; Marlene Davey; Sophie C Edgar; Günter Försterra; David E Galván; Alejo J Irigoyen; David J Kushner; Rodrigo Moura; P Ed Parnell; Nick T Shears; German Soler; Elisabeth M A Strain; Russell J Thomson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Hotspots within hotspots? Hammerhead shark movements around Wolf Island, Galapagos Marine Reserve.

Authors:  Alex Hearn; James Ketchum; A Peter Klimley; Eduardo Espinoza; Cesar Peñaherrera
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 2.573

Review 4.  Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean.

Authors:  Douglas J McCauley; Malin L Pinsky; Stephen R Palumbi; James A Estes; Francis H Joyce; Robert R Warner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Shifting elasmobranch community assemblage at Cocos Island--an isolated marine protected area.

Authors:  Easton R White; Mark C Myers; Joanna Mills Flemming; Julia K Baum
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Map-like use of Earth's magnetic field in sharks.

Authors:  Bryan A Keller; Nathan F Putman; R Dean Grubbs; David S Portnoy; Timothy P Murphy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Residency and spatial use by reef sharks of an isolated seamount and its implications for conservation.

Authors:  Adam Barnett; Kátya G Abrantes; Jamie Seymour; Richard Fitzpatrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Residency and movement patterns of an apex predatory shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) at the Galapagos Marine Reserve.

Authors:  David Acuña-Marrero; Adam N H Smith; Neil Hammerschlag; Alex Hearn; Marti J Anderson; Hannah Calich; Matthew D M Pawley; Chris Fischer; Pelayo Salinas-de-León
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status.

Authors:  Ray Hilborn; Ricardo Oscar Amoroso; Christopher M Anderson; Julia K Baum; Trevor A Branch; Christopher Costello; Carryn L de Moor; Abdelmalek Faraj; Daniel Hively; Olaf P Jensen; Hiroyuki Kurota; L Richard Little; Pamela Mace; Tim McClanahan; Michael C Melnychuk; Cóilín Minto; Giacomo Chato Osio; Ana M Parma; Maite Pons; Susana Segurado; Cody S Szuwalski; Jono R Wilson; Yimin Ye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Environmental influences on patterns of vertical movement and site fidelity of grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) at aggregation sites.

Authors:  Gabriel M S Vianna; Mark G Meekan; Jessica J Meeuwig; Conrad W Speed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.