Literature DB >> 34792565

Genome sequencing and analysis of two early-flowering cherry (Cerasus × kanzakura) varieties, 'Kawazu-zakura' and 'Atami-zakura'.

Kenta Shirasawa1, Akihiro Itai2, Sachiko Isobe1.   

Abstract

To gain genetic insights into the early-flowering phenotype of ornamental cherry, also known as sakura, we determined the genome sequences of two early-flowering cherry (Cerasus × kanzakura) varieties, 'Kawazu-zakura' and 'Atami-zakura'. Because the two varieties are interspecific hybrids, likely derived from crosses between Cerasus campanulata (early-flowering species) and Cerasus speciosa, we employed the haplotype-resolved sequence assembly strategy. Genome sequence reads obtained from each variety by single-molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT) were split into two subsets, based on the genome sequence information of the two probable ancestors, and assembled to obtain haplotype-phased genome sequences. The resultant genome assembly of 'Kawazu-zakura' spanned 519.8 Mb with 1,544 contigs and an N50 value of 1,220.5 kb, while that of 'Atami-zakura' totalled 509.6 Mb with 2,180 contigs and an N50 value of 709.1 kb. A total of 72,702 and 69,528 potential protein-coding genes were predicted in the genome assemblies of 'Kawazu-zakura' and 'Atami-zakura', respectively. Gene clustering analysis identified 2,634 clusters uniquely presented in the C. campanulata haplotype sequences, which might contribute to its early-flowering phenotype. Genome sequences determined in this study provide fundamental information for elucidating the molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying the early-flowering phenotype of ornamental cherry tree varieties and their relatives.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Kazusa DNA Research Institute.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early-flowering; genome assembly; haplotype-phased genome sequence; long-read sequencing; sakura

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34792565      PMCID: PMC8643691          DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsab026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Res        ISSN: 1340-2838            Impact factor:   4.477


1. Introduction

Flowering cherry, called sakura in Japanese, is an ornamental plant popular worldwide. A major Cerasus × yedoensis cultivar ‘Somei-Yoshino’, which is an interspecific hybrid of Cerasus spachiana and Cerasus speciosa, usually blooms from March to April in Japan. In addition, early-flowering sakura species, such as Cerasuscampanulata, usually bloom 1–2 months earlier than ‘Somei-Yoshino’, and its interspecific hybrids such as Cerasus × kanzakura also exhibit early flowering. C. × kanzakura is considered a hybrid between C. campanulata and Cerasus speciosa and/or Cerasus jamasakura, but its origin is still debated. Two C. × kanzakura cultivars, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’, also bloom early (January and February, respectively); however, the molecular mechanisms underlying their early-flowering phenotype remain unknown. Although the mechanisms of early flowering in Rosaceae family members, Japanese plum (Prunus mume) and peach (Prunus persica), which flower in February and March, respectively, are well known, it remains unclear whether these mechanisms are common between Cerasus and Prunus. Genome sequence analysis provides information on nucleotide polymorphisms and gene copy number variation, which can lead to phenotypic differences among individuals and cultivars. Pan-genomics, which involves de novo genome sequencing of multiple lines within a species, is conducted to obtain information on variation in all genes within a species to understand the origin of the organism under study., In ‘Somei-Yoshino’, haplotype-phased genome sequences have been reported, and comprehensive changes in gene expression during floral bud development that contribute towards flowering have been revealed by time-course transcriptome analysis. Therefore, comparative genomics of multiple lines of flowering cherry varieties, such as ‘Kawazu-zakura’, ‘Atami-zakura’ and ‘Somei-Yoshino’, could provide genetic insights into their early-flowering phenotypes. A trio-binning strategy, previously used in a bovine F1 hybrid to resolve two haplotype-phased genome sequences, was recently applied to ‘Somei-Yoshino’. Genes associated with the early-flowering phenotype of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ were assumed to be encoded by the C. campanulata haplotype sequences. Therefore, in this study, we used the trio-binning strategy to determine the haplotype-phased sequences of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’. Comparative analysis of three sakura genomes (‘Kawazu-zakura’, ‘Atami-zakura’ and ‘Somei-Yoshino’) facilitated the identification of genes unique to the C. campanulata haplotype sequences of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ as candidates responsible for the early-flowering phenotype of these varieties.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Plant materials and DNA extraction

Two early-flowering cherry (Cerasus × kanzakura) varieties, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’, were used in this study. Both varieties were planted at the orchard of Kyoto Prefectural University (Kyoto, Japan). Genome DNA was extracted from young leaves by a modified sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) method.

2.2 Genome size estimation

Software tools used for data analyses are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Genome libraries for short-read sequencing were prepared with the TruSeq DNA PCR-Free Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced on the NextSeq 500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) in paired-end, 150 bp mode. The genome size was estimated with Jellyfish.

2.3 De novo genome sequence assembly and reference-guided contig ordering and orientation

Genomes of the two cherry varieties were sequenced using the single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing technology. Long-read DNA libraries were constructed using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA, USA) and sequenced on SMRT cells (1M v3 LR) in a PacBio Sequel system (PacBio). Raw sequence reads of each variety were divided into two subsets with the trio-binning strategy using the short-read data of C. campanulata (‘Kanhi-zakura’) and C. speciosa (‘Ohshima-zakura’) together with six lines (Supplementary Table S2), which are representatives of 139 flowering cherries (DDBJ sequence archive accession no.: DRA008096). The sequence read subsets were assembled separately with Falcon or Canu to build haplotype-phased diploid genome sequences. Sequence errors in the contigs were corrected twice using long reads with ARROW. Potential contaminating sequence reads from organelle genomes were identified by alignments with the chloroplast and mitochondrial genome sequences of Prunus avium (GenBank accession nos: MK622380 and MK816392) with Minimap2 and then removed from the final assemblies. Haplotype-phased sequences, based on binning with C. campanulata and C. speciosa, were aligned against the C. spachiana and C. speciosa haplotype sequences, respectively, of the ‘Somei-Yoshino’ genome using Ragoo to build pseudomolecule sequences. Genome sequences were compared with D-Genies, and coverage was calculated with BEDTools. Two haplotype sequences were aligned with Minimap2 to identify sequence variants by paftools implemented in Minimap2.

2.4 Gene prediction and repetitive sequence analysis

Potential protein-coding genes were predicted with the MAKER pipeline, which was based on peptide sequences predicted from the genome sequences of sweet cherry (PAV_r1.0), peach (v2.0.a1) and Japanese plum. Short genes (<300 bp) as well as genes predicted with an annotation edit distance >0.5, which is proposed as a threshold for good annotations in the MAKER protocol, were removed to facilitate the selection of high-confidence (HC) genes. Functional annotation of the predicted genes was performed with Hayai-Annotation Plants. Gene clustering was performed with OrthoFinder and visualized with UpSetR. Repetitive sequences in the pseudomolecules were identified with RepeatMasker using repeat sequences registered in Repbase and a de novo repeat library built with RepeatModeler. The identified repetitive sequences were classified into nine types, in accordance with RepeatMasker: short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs), long terminal repeat (LTR) elements, DNA elements, small RNAs, satellites, simple repeats, low-complexity repeats and unclassified.

3. Results and data description

3.1 De novo assembly of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ genomes

Short reads amounting to 64.0 and 127.7 Gb were obtained for ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’, respectively. The genome sizes of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ were estimated at 672.7 and 675.2 Mb, respectively (Fig. 1). Because ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ are interspecific hybrids, we used a trio-binning strategy to establish haplotype-resolved genome assemblies representing each parental genome sequence.
Figure 1

Estimation of the genome size of two flowering cherry (Cerasus × kanzakura) varieties, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’, based on k-mer analysis (k = 17), with the given multiplicity values.

Estimation of the genome size of two flowering cherry (Cerasus × kanzakura) varieties, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’, based on k-mer analysis (k = 17), with the given multiplicity values. Long-read data (34.9 Gb) of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ obtained from two SMRT cells were evenly divided into two subsets (17.2 and 17.6 Gb), in accordance with the short-read data of potential parental species, C. campanulata and C. speciosa, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). Reads in each subset were independently assembled with Falcon or Canu to construct contigs representing the two haplotype sequences (Supplementary Table S3). We employed the Falcon assembly for further analysis, because the contig number was less than that in Canu assembly. Potential errors in the haplotype sequences were corrected with long reads, and sequences of organelle genomes were removed to obtain the final assembly of the diploid genome of ‘Kawazu-zakura’. The resulting assemblies consisted of C. campanulata (262.2 Mb, N50 = 1.4 Mb) and C. speciosa (257.6 Mb, N50 = 1.1 Mb) haplotypes (Table 1) and were designated as KWZcam_r1.0 and KWZspe_r1.0, respectively. Although the total assembly size was shorter than the estimated size, the complete BUSCO scores of KWZcam_r1.0 and KWZspe_r1.0 were 93.1% and 96.7%, respectively, indicating that the assemblies were complete (Table 1). The two assemblies were merged to generate KWZ_r1.0, with a complete BUSCO score of 98.0%.
Table 1

Statistics of the contig sequences of two flowering cherry (Cerasus × kanzakura) cultivars, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’

KWZ_r1.0KWZcam_r1.0KWZspe_r1.0ATM_r1.0ATMcam_r1.0ATMspe_r1.0
Total contig size (bases)519,843,677262,196,010257,647,667509,633,549267,393,285242,240,264
Number of contigs1,5447837612,1801,1241,056
Contig N50 length (bases)1,220,4951,445,1441,108,133709,113853,547569,444
Longest contig size (bases)8,019,0665,955,6778,019,0665,799,3125,799,3123,381,444
Gap (bases)000000
Complete BUSCOs98.2%93.1%96.7%98.0%93.4%93.5%
Single-copy BUSCOs7.5%86.7%89.0%16.0%86.5%87.8%
Duplicated BUSCOs90.7%6.4%7.7%82.0%6.9%5.7%
Fragmented BUSCOs0.3%0.7%0.4%0.4%0.7%1.6%
Missing BUSCOs1.5%6.2%2.9%1.6%5.9%4.9%
#Genes72,70236,28136,42172,52836,26436,264
Statistics of the contig sequences of two flowering cherry (Cerasus × kanzakura) cultivars, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ The ‘Atami-zakura’ genome was sequenced in parallel with the ‘Kawazu-zakura’ genome. Long-read data of ‘Atami-zakura’ (14.3 Gb) were obtained from two SMRT cells and divided into two subsets (7.4 and 6.8 Gb) using the short-read data of C. campanulata and C. speciosa, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). The reads were assembled with Falcon or Canu to generate two haplotype contig sequences (Supplementary Table S3). The size of the Falcon assembly was much smaller than the Canu assembly. Therefore, we used the Canu for further assembly. This was followed by potential sequence error correction and organelle genome sequence removal. The sizes of the resultant assemblies were improved to 267.4 Mb (N50 = 853.5 kb) and 242.2 Mb (N50 = 569.4 Mb) for the C. campanulata and C. speciosa haplotypes, respectively (Table 1), and the assemblies were designated as ATMcam_r1.0 and ATMspe_r1.0, respectively. The complete BUSCO scores were 93.4% and 93.5% for ATMcam_r1.0 and ATMspe_r1.0, respectively (Table 1), and 98.2% for the merged assembly (ATM_r1.0).

3.2 Reference-guided pseudomolecule sequence construction

Because the genome structures are well conserved across the Cerasus and Prunus species, we used the two haplotype pseudomolecule sequences of the ‘Somei-Yoshino’ genome, CYEspachiana_r3.1 and CYEspeciosa_r3.1, as references to establish the pseudomolecule sequences of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’. A total of 777 and 746 contigs of KWZcam_r1.0 and KWZspe_r1.0, respectively, were aligned against CYEspachiana_r3.1 and CYEspeciosa_r3.1 sequences, respectively. The lengths of the resultant ‘Kawazu-zakura’ pseudomolecule sequences were 256.7 Mb (KWZcam_r1.0) and 246.5 Mb (KWZspe_r1.0) (Table 2). On the other hand, 1,110 ATMcam_r1.0 and 1,041 ATMspe_r1.0 contigs were aligned with the CYEspachiana_r3.1 and CYEspeciosa_r3.1 sequences, respectively, and the lengths of the ‘Atami-zakura’ pseudomolecule sequences obtained were 261.5 Mb (ATMcam_r1.0) and 238.9 Mb (ATMspe_r1.0) (Table 2). The pseudomolecule sequences of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ genomes covered 92.5% and 92.1% of genome sequence of ‘Somei-Yoshino’, respectively (Fig. 2).
Table 2

Statistics of the pseudomolecule sequences of flowering cherry (C. × kanzakura) cultivars, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’

‘Kawazu-zakura’
‘Atami-zakura’
Chrom.Total length%Number of contigs%Number of genes%Total length%Number of contigs%Number of genes%
C. campanulata haplotype138,834,32214.88611.05,17314.337,943,01314.212310.95,18014.3
245,216,40217.221627.66,88119.049,279,92618.428925.76,71018.5
328,286,29410.8749.53,83710.629,043,60310.91089.63,88510.7
431,150,79611.911014.03,74710.333,258,13612.415714.04,44212.2
528,296,80510.88210.53,85210.626,412,6179.9837.43,62510.0
633,630,10612.88310.64,90813.534,947,85513.113211.74,87113.4
720,603,7217.9617.82,7027.421,052,8787.9928.23,0038.3
830,708,64611.7658.34,55912.629,538,87011.012611.23,74510.3
Unassigned5,546,3182.160.86221.76,027,8872.3141.28032.2
Total262,273,410100.0783100.036,281100.0267,504,785100.01,124100.036,264100.0
C. speciosa haplotype142,661,82416.68210.85,91216.238,473,69215.913612.95,64417.0
233,947,39713.212516.44,80413.232,131,56513.317917.04,49513.5
329,126,07911.38110.64,36712.030,781,26012.711110.54,26912.8
434,989,19613.616221.34,66812.835,466,10414.621420.34,53213.6
525,691,27210.09913.03,72910.223,383,7769.61009.53,0629.2
629,111,56011.3567.44,24011.632,639,48013.512011.44,53213.6
716,872,4266.5202.62,3286.416,033,1686.6403.82,1746.5
834,141,90213.212115.95,12514.130,022,32312.414113.44,07512.3
Unassigned11,181,2114.3152.01,2483.43,413,5961.4151.44811.4
Total257,722,867100.0761100.036,421100.0242,344,964100.01,056100.033,264100.0
Figure 2

Comparative analysis of the genome sequence and structure of flowering cherry varieties, ‘Atami-zakura’, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Somei-Yoshino’. Chromosome numbers are indicated above the x-axis and on the right side of the y-axis. Genome sizes (Mb) are below the x-axis and on the left side of the y-axis.

Comparative analysis of the genome sequence and structure of flowering cherry varieties, ‘Atami-zakura’, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Somei-Yoshino’. Chromosome numbers are indicated above the x-axis and on the right side of the y-axis. Genome sizes (Mb) are below the x-axis and on the left side of the y-axis. Statistics of the pseudomolecule sequences of flowering cherry (C. × kanzakura) cultivars, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’

3.3 Gene and repetitive sequence predictions

A total of 36,281 and 36,421 HC protein-coding genes were predicted in KWZcam_r1.0 and KWZspe_r1.0 assemblies, respectively (Table 2). The complete BUSCO scores of genes in the KWZcam_r1.0 and KWZspe_r1.0 were 88.3% and 86.6%, respectively, while the BUSCO score of all 72,702 genes was 97.0%. Functional gene annotation revealed that 9,430, 17,907 and 12,603 sequences were assigned to Gene Ontology (GO) slim terms in the biological process, cellular component and molecular function categories, respectively, and 2,264 genes had enzyme commission numbers. On the other hand, 36,264 and 33,264 HC genes were predicted in ATMcam_r1.0 and ATMspe_r1.0 assemblies, respectively (Table 2). Complete BUSCOs of genes in ATMcam_r1.0 and ATMspe_r1.0 were 88.3% and 86.6%, respectively, while that of all 69,528 genes was 96.8%. According to the functional gene annotation, 9,836, 18,586 and 13,020 sequences were assigned to GO slim terms in the biological process, cellular component and molecular function categories, respectively, and 2,301 genes had enzyme commission numbers. Repeat sequences occupied varying proportions of the different genome assemblies: 48.0% (KWZcam_r1.0), 45.7% (KWZspe_r1.0), 47.7% (ATMcam_r1.0) and 43.2% (ATMspe_r1.0). LTR elements were the most abundant repetitive sequences (15.1–17.7%), followed by unclassified repeats (12.7–13.7%) and DNA transposons (11.1–13.2%) (Table 3).
Table 3.

Repetitive sequences in two flowering cherry (C. × kanzakura) cultivars, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’

‘Kawazu-zakura’
‘Atami-zakura’
C. campanulata haplotype
C. speciosa haplotype
C. campanulata haplotype
C. speciosa haplotype
Repeat typeNumber of elementsLength occupied (bp)%Number of elementsLength occupied (bp)%Number of elementsLength occupied (bp)%Number of elementsLength occupied (bp)%
SINEs5,278495,2070.27,013665,4510.38,832896,2230.36,537608,5410.3
LINEs9,3583,548,3571.49,9803,635,0401.49,2423,175,0481.29,2853,460,4321.4
LTR elements63,02545,423,27517.357,17542,749,59416.661,50347,443,44417.752,22136,517,55115.1
DNA transposons85,64733,936,56312.984,15130,984,01512.088,99935,176,60113.277,63626,829,23611.1
Unclassified131,19936,041,45513.7116,20132,825,94112.7130,20934,407,19412.9112,66331,370,49412.9
Small RNA5,384657,3260.37,2111,536,5410.66,949828,2010.32,598503,9110.2
Satellites1,072277,2220.129753,4250.01,083399,3070.234275,8600.0
Simple repeats75,5673,104,5581.277,0823,144,0461.277,7503,266,1961.274,4143,048,4421.3
Low complexity14,265706,2710.314,754717,6290.314,352695,4810.314,137693,3390.3
Repetitive sequences in two flowering cherry (C. × kanzakura) cultivars, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’

3.4 Gene clustering and sequence variant analyses in early-flowering cherry varieties

Four sets of genes predicted in the haplotype-phased genomes of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ clustered with two sets of genes in the two haploid sequences of ‘Somei-Yoshino’. A total of 35,226 clusters were obtained, of which 10,702 were common across all six gene sets (Fig. 3). The early-flowering phenotype of C. × kanzakura could be explained by genes uniquely present in the C. campanulata haplotype sequences. In the C. campanulata haplotype sequences of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ genomes, a total of 2,634 clusters were found to include 3,123 and 3,113 genes, respectively (Supplementary Table S4).
Figure 3

Number of gene clusters identified in the haplotype sequences of the three sakura genomes. Gene clusters uniquely presented in the C. campanulata haplotype sequences are shown in red.

Number of gene clusters identified in the haplotype sequences of the three sakura genomes. Gene clusters uniquely presented in the C. campanulata haplotype sequences are shown in red. The two haplotype sequences were aligned and compared with identify 894,869 base substitutions and 165,767 insertions/deletions in ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and 847,624 base substitutions and 135,724 insertions/deletions in ‘Atami-zakura’ (Supplementary Table S5).

4. Conclusion and future perspectives

Here, we report haplotype-phased genome assemblies of two early-flowering cherry (C. × kanzakura) cultivars, ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’, both of which are interspecific hybrids derived from C. campanulata and C. speciosa. Although the origin of C. × kanzakura remains unclear, C. campanulata and C. speciosa and/or C. jamasakura are considered as its potential parents. Another possibility is that ‘Atami-zakura’ originated from C. jamasakura and C. campanulata. This is supported by the fact that our attempt to divide the long reads of ‘Atami-zakura’ into two subsets using short-read data of C. serrulata (closely related to C. jamasakura) and C. campanulata failed (Supplementary Table S2). Therefore, we used short reads of C. campanulata and C. speciosa for both ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’. This result suggests that both ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ are closely related to C. campanulata and C. speciosa. Clustering analysis of genes predicted in the genomes of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ together with those of ‘Somei-Yoshino’ revealed that 2,634 gene clusters were uniquely present in the genome of C. campanulata but absent from the genomes of C. spachiana and C. speciosa (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table S4). Such copy number variation (or presence/absence variation) of genes could explain the early-flowering phenotype of ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’. In addition, approximately 1 million sequence variants were found between the two haplotype sequences in both ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’ (Supplementary Table S3). Previously, we performed a time-course transcriptome analysis of the floral buds and flowers of ‘Somei-Yoshino’ to clarify gene expression patterns during flowering., A similar time-course transcriptome analysis could be applied to ‘Kawazu-zakura’ and ‘Atami-zakura’. Comparative transcriptome analysis of three cultivars could identify the genes responsible for the early-flowering phenotype of sakura. Furthermore, comparative transcriptome analysis of Japanese apricot and peach could reveal the genetic mechanisms controlling flowering time across all Prunus and Cerasus species. Although several flowering cherry cultivars are known to bloom in late-spring, fall and winter seasons, genome sequences of only a few of these cultivars are publicly available.,, Comparative genomics and transcriptomics, also known as pan-genomics, of sakura would provide insights into the origins of these cultivars and their flowering mechanisms, which could facilitate the development of new cultivars with attractive flower characteristics and provide us with the ability to forecast the date of sakura blooming. Click here for additional data file.
  13 in total

1.  The genome of Chinese flowering cherry (Cerasus serrulata) provides new insights into Cerasus species.

Authors:  Xian-Gui Yi; Xia-Qing Yu; Jie Chen; Min Zhang; Shao-Wei Liu; Hong Zhu; Meng Li; Yi-Fan Duan; Lin Chen; Lei Wu; Shun Zhu; Zhong-Shuai Sun; Xin-Hong Liu; Xian-Rong Wang
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.793

2.  The genome of Prunus mume.

Authors:  Qixiang Zhang; Wenbin Chen; Lidan Sun; Fangying Zhao; Bangqing Huang; Weiru Yang; Ye Tao; Jia Wang; Zhiqiong Yuan; Guangyi Fan; Zhen Xing; Changlei Han; Huitang Pan; Xiao Zhong; Wenfang Shi; Xinming Liang; Dongliang Du; Fengming Sun; Zongda Xu; Ruijie Hao; Tian Lv; Yingmin Lv; Zequn Zheng; Ming Sun; Le Luo; Ming Cai; Yike Gao; Junyi Wang; Ye Yin; Xun Xu; Tangren Cheng; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  The Peach v2.0 release: high-resolution linkage mapping and deep resequencing improve chromosome-scale assembly and contiguity.

Authors:  Ignazio Verde; Jerry Jenkins; Luca Dondini; Sabrina Micali; Giulia Pagliarani; Elisa Vendramin; Roberta Paris; Valeria Aramini; Laura Gazza; Laura Rossini; Daniele Bassi; Michela Troggio; Shengqiang Shu; Jane Grimwood; Stefano Tartarini; Maria Teresa Dettori; Jeremy Schmutz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Phased genome sequence of an interspecific hybrid flowering cherry, 'Somei-Yoshino' (Cerasus × yedoensis).

Authors:  Kenta Shirasawa; Tomoya Esumi; Hideki Hirakawa; Hideyuki Tanaka; Akihiro Itai; Andrea Ghelfi; Hideki Nagasaki; Sachiko Isobe
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 5.  Genome sequences of horticultural plants: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Yunfeng Song; Xiaojiang Li; Junhao Chen; Lan Mo; Xingtan Zhang; Zhenguo Lin; Liangsheng Zhang
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 6.793

6.  Cherry Blossom Forecast Based on Transcriptome of Floral Organs Approaching Blooming in the Flowering Cherry (Cerasus × yedoensis) Cultivar 'Somei-Yoshino'.

Authors:  Kenta Shirasawa; Tomoya Esumi; Akihiro Itai; Sachiko Isobe
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Draft genome sequence of wild Prunus yedoensis reveals massive inter-specific hybridization between sympatric flowering cherries.

Authors:  Seunghoon Baek; Kyung Choi; Goon-Bo Kim; Hee-Ju Yu; Ara Cho; Hoyeol Jang; Changkyun Kim; Hyuk-Jin Kim; Kae Sun Chang; Joo-Hwan Kim; Jeong-Hwan Mun
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  De novo assembly of haplotype-resolved genomes with trio binning.

Authors:  Sergey Koren; Arang Rhie; Brian P Walenz; Alexander T Dilthey; Derek M Bickhart; Sarah B Kingan; Stefan Hiendleder; John L Williams; Timothy P L Smith; Adam M Phillippy
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  15 years of GDR: New data and functionality in the Genome Database for Rosaceae.

Authors:  Sook Jung; Taein Lee; Chun-Huai Cheng; Katheryn Buble; Ping Zheng; Jing Yu; Jodi Humann; Stephen P Ficklin; Ksenija Gasic; Kristin Scott; Morgan Frank; Sushan Ru; Heidi Hough; Kate Evans; Cameron Peace; Mercy Olmstead; Lisa W DeVetter; James McFerson; Michael Coe; Jill L Wegrzyn; Margaret E Staton; Albert G Abbott; Dorrie Main
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  How the pan-genome is changing crop genomics and improvement.

Authors:  Rafael Della Coletta; Yinjie Qiu; Shujun Ou; Matthew B Hufford; Candice N Hirsch
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Transposable Elements and the Identification of Candidate Centromeric Elements in the Prunus Subgenus Cerasus and Its Relatives.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Yan Wang; Jing Zhang; Yan Feng; Qing Chen; Zhen-Shan Liu; Cong-Li Liu; Wen He; Hao Wang; Shao-Feng Yang; Yong Zhang; Ya Luo; Hao-Ru Tang; Xiao-Rong Wang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.141

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.