Literature DB >> 3479224

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of nose and paranasal sinus disease.

G A Lloyd1, V J Lund, P D Phelps, D J Howard.   

Abstract

Fifty patients with a wide range of sinus disease have been examined by magnetic resonance. These included congenital conditions, inflammatory and allergic sinus disease, fungus infection, and both necrotising and non-necrotising granulomas. A variety of benign and malignant tumours have been investigated, including eight examples of juvenile angiofibroma and 19 malignant sinus tumours. This experience of magnetic resonance scanning has shown that it is superior to computed tomography in showing the extent of malignant disease and, provided the correct pulse sequences are employed, it is always possible to distinguish tumour from retained secretion or inflamed mucosa. The extent of intracranial invasion can also be optimally demonstrated. One of the advantages of the method is the direct three-plane imaging and multislice technique, which gives total coverage of the head and neck for the assessment of malignant disease. Tissue diagnosis in the paranasal sinuses is less important than the demonstration of tumour extent and distribution. Only one tumour (juvenile angiofibroma) showed diagnostic spin-sequence characteristics, and no differentiation was observed between malignant tumours of epithelial and mesenchymal origin. The major drawback of magnetic resonance is the poor demonstration of bone and calcification in the sinuses, so that in some patients the scans need to be augmented by computed tomography studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3479224     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-60-718-957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

1.  "Unusual" MRI appearance of sphenoid sinus mucocele.

Authors:  A Ruelle; R Pisani; G Andrioli
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  MR of the paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  E Beahm; L Teresi; R Lufkin; W Hanafee
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  CT and MR assessment of tumors of the nose and paranasal sinuses, the nasopharynx and the parapharyngeal space using ROC methodology.

Authors:  M G Hunink; R G de Slegte; G J Gerritsen; H Speelman
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the nose and paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  G A Lloyd
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  The sphenoid sinus during childhood: establishment of normal developmental standards by MRI.

Authors:  D Szolar; K Preidler; G Ranner; H Braun; C Kugler; G Wolf; H Stammberger; F Ebner
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Infrasellar craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  T Akimura; H Kameda; S Abiko; H Aoki; T Kido
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography and different imaging modalities in evaluation of sinonasal neoplasms diagnosed by histopathology.

Authors:  Mohammed A Gomaa; Moustafa S Hammad; Abobakr Abdelmoghny; Ashraf M Elsherif; Heba M Tawfik
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2013-06-26

8.  Foreign body mimicking malignancy in acquired dacryocystocele.

Authors:  Ahmad A Mirza; Atheer F Alsharif; Omar A Elmays; Osama A Marglani
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-03

9.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to quantify the inflammatory response following allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Brian R Leaker; Glenis Scadding; C Richard Jones; Peter J Barnes
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2015-09-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.