Janelle Tong1,2, Nayuta Yoshioka1, David Alonso-Caneiro3, Barbara Zangerl1,2. 1. School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia. 2. School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW, Sydney, Australia. 3. Centre for Vision and Eye Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With equivalent inner retinal thickness measurements compared to a more conventional composite optical coherence tomography (OCT) protocol, Widefield optical coherence tomography (WF-OCT) is a clinically viable, time-saving option facilitating detection of ocular pathologies within the central 55° of the retina. PURPOSE: To compare ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses obtained using a single WF-OCT scan and standard composite OCT scans acquired in 9 fields of gaze (9F-OCT). METHODS: Thirteen healthy participants underwent WF-OCT and 9F-OCT using the Spectralis OCT. The GCIPL was automatically segmented with a manual review for 9F-OCT and was manually segmented for WF-OCT. After registration, differences in GCIPL thicknesses were compared using 95% confidence intervals computed from one-sample t-tests and Bland-Altman analyses. Location-specific differences in B-scan tilt were analysed using Spearman correlations and linear regression models. To determine whether B-scan tilt influences GCIPL measurements, regression models of tilt versus differences between perpendicular and axial GCIPL thickness were applied. RESULTS: While scattered locations demonstrated significant GCIPL thickness differences between WF-OCT and 9F-OCT, most differences did not exceed the axial pixel resolution of the instrument of 3.87 µm. Bland-Altman analyses indicated no notable bias using WF-OCT. Moderate correlations indicating significant location-specific differences in B-scan tilt were observed for temporal, central and inferior B-scans (r = -0.62 to 0.72), with linear regression models predicting a maximum difference in the tilt of 4.65°. The quadratic regression model indicated that at tilts greater than 27.3°, perpendicular GCIPL measurements become increasingly thin relative to axial measurements. CONCLUSIONS: GCIPL thicknesses and B-scan tilts from WF-OCT are comparable to 9F-OCT, indicating that WF-OCT can be applied clinically to obtain valid inner retinal OCT measurements over 55° of the central retina with relative ease. However, for peripheral locations, B-scan tilt may need to be considered when measuring GCIPL thicknesses.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With equivalent inner retinal thickness measurements compared to a more conventional composite optical coherence tomography (OCT) protocol, Widefield optical coherence tomography (WF-OCT) is a clinically viable, time-saving option facilitating detection of ocular pathologies within the central 55° of the retina. PURPOSE: To compare ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses obtained using a single WF-OCT scan and standard composite OCT scans acquired in 9 fields of gaze (9F-OCT). METHODS: Thirteen healthy participants underwent WF-OCT and 9F-OCT using the Spectralis OCT. The GCIPL was automatically segmented with a manual review for 9F-OCT and was manually segmented for WF-OCT. After registration, differences in GCIPL thicknesses were compared using 95% confidence intervals computed from one-sample t-tests and Bland-Altman analyses. Location-specific differences in B-scan tilt were analysed using Spearman correlations and linear regression models. To determine whether B-scan tilt influences GCIPL measurements, regression models of tilt versus differences between perpendicular and axial GCIPL thickness were applied. RESULTS: While scattered locations demonstrated significant GCIPL thickness differences between WF-OCT and 9F-OCT, most differences did not exceed the axial pixel resolution of the instrument of 3.87 µm. Bland-Altman analyses indicated no notable bias using WF-OCT. Moderate correlations indicating significant location-specific differences in B-scan tilt were observed for temporal, central and inferior B-scans (r = -0.62 to 0.72), with linear regression models predicting a maximum difference in the tilt of 4.65°. The quadratic regression model indicated that at tilts greater than 27.3°, perpendicular GCIPL measurements become increasingly thin relative to axial measurements. CONCLUSIONS: GCIPL thicknesses and B-scan tilts from WF-OCT are comparable to 9F-OCT, indicating that WF-OCT can be applied clinically to obtain valid inner retinal OCT measurements over 55° of the central retina with relative ease. However, for peripheral locations, B-scan tilt may need to be considered when measuring GCIPL thicknesses.
Authors: Jason Kugelman; Joseph Allman; Scott A Read; Stephen J Vincent; Janelle Tong; Michael Kalloniatis; Fred K Chen; Michael J Collins; David Alonso-Caneiro Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 4.996