BACKGROUND: Parenting interventions during the first years of life on what and/or how to feed infants during complementary feeding can promote healthy eating habits. OBJECTIVES: An intervention promoting repeated exposure to a variety of vegetables [repeated vegetable exposure (RVE); what] and an intervention promoting responding sensitively to child signals during mealtime [video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting-feeding infants (VIPP-FI); how] were compared, separately and combined (COMBI), with an attention control condition (AC). Primary outcomes were vegetable consumption and self-regulation of energy intake; secondary outcomes were child anthropometrics and maternal feeding practices (sensitive feeding, pressure to eat). METHODS: Our 4-arm randomized controlled trial included 246 first-time Dutch mothers and their infants. Interventions started when infants were 4-6 mo old and ended at age 16 mo. The present study evaluated effects at 18 (t18) and 24 (t24) mo of age. Vegetable acceptance was assessed using three 24-h dietary recalls, self-regulation of energy intake by an eating-in-the-absence-of-hunger experiment and mother-report, and maternal feeding behavior by observation and mother-report. RESULTS: Linear mixed model and ANOVA analyses revealed no follow-up group differences regarding child vegetable intake or self-regulatory behavior. The proportion of children with overweight was significantly lower in the COMBI group, compared with the VIPP-FI group at t18 (2% compared with 16%), and with the AC group at t24 (7% compared with 20%), although this finding needs to be interpreted cautiously due to the small number of infants with overweight and nonsignificant effects on the continuous BMI z-score measure (P values: 0.29-0.82). Finally, more sensitive feeding behavior and less pressure to eat was found in the VIPP-FI and COMBI groups, compared with the RVE and AC groups, mostly at t18 (significant effect sizes: d = 0.23-0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions were not effective in increasing vegetable intake or self-regulation of energy intake. Future research might usefully focus on risk groups such as families who already experience problems around feeding.This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03348176.
BACKGROUND: Parenting interventions during the first years of life on what and/or how to feed infants during complementary feeding can promote healthy eating habits. OBJECTIVES: An intervention promoting repeated exposure to a variety of vegetables [repeated vegetable exposure (RVE); what] and an intervention promoting responding sensitively to child signals during mealtime [video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting-feeding infants (VIPP-FI); how] were compared, separately and combined (COMBI), with an attention control condition (AC). Primary outcomes were vegetable consumption and self-regulation of energy intake; secondary outcomes were child anthropometrics and maternal feeding practices (sensitive feeding, pressure to eat). METHODS: Our 4-arm randomized controlled trial included 246 first-time Dutch mothers and their infants. Interventions started when infants were 4-6 mo old and ended at age 16 mo. The present study evaluated effects at 18 (t18) and 24 (t24) mo of age. Vegetable acceptance was assessed using three 24-h dietary recalls, self-regulation of energy intake by an eating-in-the-absence-of-hunger experiment and mother-report, and maternal feeding behavior by observation and mother-report. RESULTS: Linear mixed model and ANOVA analyses revealed no follow-up group differences regarding child vegetable intake or self-regulatory behavior. The proportion of children with overweight was significantly lower in the COMBI group, compared with the VIPP-FI group at t18 (2% compared with 16%), and with the AC group at t24 (7% compared with 20%), although this finding needs to be interpreted cautiously due to the small number of infants with overweight and nonsignificant effects on the continuous BMI z-score measure (P values: 0.29-0.82). Finally, more sensitive feeding behavior and less pressure to eat was found in the VIPP-FI and COMBI groups, compared with the RVE and AC groups, mostly at t18 (significant effect sizes: d = 0.23-0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions were not effective in increasing vegetable intake or self-regulation of energy intake. Future research might usefully focus on risk groups such as families who already experience problems around feeding.This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03348176.
Authors: M S van Vliet; J Mesman; J M Schultink; J H M de Vries; C M J L Vereijken; R C A Rippe; S M C van der Veek Journal: Appetite Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Nicole A Reigh; Barbara J Rolls; Jennifer S Savage; Susan L Johnson; Kathleen L Keller Journal: Appetite Date: 2020-08-16 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Jennifer S Savage; Emily E Hohman; Michele E Marini; Amy Shelly; Ian M Paul; Leann L Birch Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Samantha J Caton; Pam Blundell; Sara M Ahern; Chandani Nekitsing; Annemarie Olsen; Per Møller; Helene Hausner; Eloïse Remy; Sophie Nicklaus; Claire Chabanet; Sylvie Issanchou; Marion M Hetherington Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Saskia Meijboom; Martinette T van Houts-Streppel; Corine Perenboom; Els Siebelink; Anne M van de Wiel; Anouk Geelen; Edith J M Feskens; Jeanne H M de Vries Journal: J Nutr Sci Date: 2017-09-19