| Literature DB >> 34791090 |
Daniela Michlmayr1,2, Luís Alves de Sousa3,4, Luise Müller3, Pikka Jokelainen1, Steen Ethelberg3,5, Lasse Skafte Vestergaard1,3, Susanne Schjørring1, Sarah Mikkelsen6, Carl Widstrup Jensen6, Lasse Dam Rasmussen7, Christen Rune Stensvold1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microsporidia are rarely reported to cause outbreaks of diarrhea. We describe a foodborne outbreak of microsporidiosis from a workplace canteen in November 2020 in Denmark.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Enterocytozoonzzm321990 ; foodborne disease; microsporidia; microsporidiosis; outbreak
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34791090 PMCID: PMC9427152 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 20.999
General Demographic Characteristics of Non-cases and Cases During an Enterocytozoon bieneusi Outbreak, Denmark, 2020 Identified Through a Questionnaire Investigation (N = 195)
| Non-cases (N = 143) | Cases (N = 52) | Total (N = 195) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, n (%) | .32[ | |||
| Female | 62 (43) | 18 (35) | 80 (41) | |
| Male | 81 (57) | 34 (65) | 115 (59) | |
| Age, years | .43[ | |||
| Median (range) | 47.0 (24.0–66.0) | 45.0 (25.0–65.0) | 46.0 (24.0–66.0) | |
| Missing (n) | 9 | 4 | 13 |
Fisher exact test with simulated P-value (based on 1000 replicates).
Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test.
Summary of General Demographic Characteristics, Clinical Presentation, and Duration of Illness Reported by Probable and Confirmed Cases Identified During an Enterocytozoon bieneusi Outbreak, Denmark, 2020 (N = 52)
| Probable Cases (N = 44) | Confirmed Cases (N = 8) | Total (N = 52) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, n (%) | .99[ | |||
| Female | 15 (34) | 3 (38) | 18 (35) | |
| Male | 29 (66) | 5 (62) | 34 (65) | |
| Age, years | .68[ | |||
| Median (range) | 45.5 (25.0–65.0) | 42.5 (30.0–57.0) | 45.0 (25.0–65.0) | |
| Missing, n | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Clinical manifestations | ||||
| Any gastrointestinal symptom(s), n (%) | .99[ | |||
| No | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Yes | 43 (98) | 8 (100) | 51 (98) | |
| Do not remember | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | |
| Diarrhea, n (%) | .99[ | |||
| No | 5 (11) | 0 (0) | 5 (10) | |
| Yes | 39 (89) | 8 (100) | 47 (90) | |
| Do not remember | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0(0) | |
| Abdominal pain, n (%) | .99[ | |||
| No | 9 (20) | 1 (12) | 10 (19) | |
| Yes | 34 (77) | 7 (88) | 41 (79) | |
| Do not remember | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | |
| Nausea, n (%) | .09[ | |||
| No | 15 (34) | 0 (0) | 15 (29) | |
| Yes | 29 (66) | 8 (100) | 37 (71) | |
| Do not remember | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0(0) | |
| Vomiting, n (%) | .6[ | |||
| No | 33 (75) | 7 (88) | 40 (77) | |
| Yes | 11 (25) | 1 (12) | 12 (23) | |
| Do not remember | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0(0) | |
| Fever, n (%) | .05[ | |||
| No | 30 (68) | 2 (25) | 32 (62) | |
| Yes | 12 (27) | 6 (75) | 18 (35) | |
| Do not remember | 2 (5) | 0 (0) | 2 (4) | |
| Headache, n (%) | .06[ | |||
| No | 23 (52) | 1 (12) | 24 (46) | |
| Yes | 21 (48) | 7 (88) | 28 (54) | |
| Do not remember | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0(0) | |
| Muscle pain, n (%) | .01[ | |||
| No | 28 (64) | 1 (12) | 29 (56) | |
| Yes | 15 (34) | 7 (88) | 22 (42) | |
| Do not remember | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | |
| Fatigue, n (%) | .44[ | |||
| No | 8 (18) | 0 (0) | 8 (15) | |
| Yes | 35 (80) | 8 (100) | 43 (83) | |
| Do not remember | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | |
| Incubation period, days | .02[ | |||
| Median (range) | 11.5 (1–38) | 9 (5–12) | 11 (1–38) | |
| Duration of illness, days, – n (%) | .01[ | |||
| 1–7 | 27 (61) | 1 (13) | 28 (54) | |
| 8–14 | 11 (25) | 3 (38) | 14 (27) | |
| 15–21 | 2 (5) | 0 (0) | 2 (4) | |
| 22 | 4 (9) | 4 (50) | 8 (15) | |
| Hospital admission, n (%) | … | |||
| No | 44 (100) | 8 (100) | 52 (100) | |
| Yes | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0(0) | |
| Contact with symptomatic person (last 2 weeks), n (%) | .99[ | |||
| No | 40 (91) | 8 (100) | 48 (92) | |
| Yes | 3 (7) | 0 (0) | 3 (6) | |
| Do not know | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | |
Fisher exact test.
Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test.
Fisher exact test with simulated P-value (based on 1000 replicates).
Figure 1.Distribution of cases (N = 48) in the Enterocytozoon bieneusi-associated outbreak in Denmark 2020, by sex and 10-year age groups.
Figure 2.Distribution of cases (N = 52) of the Enterocytozoon bieneusi-associated outbreak in Denmark 2020, by date of symptom onset and case definition.
Univariate Analysis of Data On Exposures, by Date of Lunch at the Canteen of the Company Affected by the Enterocytozoon bieneusi outbreak in Denmark, 2020
| Exposure | Exposed | Unexposed | 95% CI | % Cases | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Lunch) | Total | Cases | AR (%) | Total | Cases | AR (%) | RR | Low | Upper |
| Exposed |
| Between 2 and 15 November | 160 | 46 | 29 | 32 | 4 | 13 | 2.3 | .9 | 5.9 | .08 | 88 |
| 2 November | 121 | 38 | 31 | 58 | 11 | 19 | 1.7 | .9 | 3.0 | .11 | 73 |
| 3 November | 117 | 34 | 29 | 61 | 13 | 21 | 1.4 | .8 | 2.4 | .29 | 65 |
| 4 November | 104 | 37 | 36 | 70 | 9 | 13 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 5.4 | .00 | 71 |
| 5 November | 106 | 35 | 33 | 72 | 12 | 17 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 3.6 | .02 | 67 |
| 6 November | 79 | 23 | 29 | 97 | 23 | 24 | 1.2 | .7 | 2.0 | .49 | 44 |
| 9 November | 109 | 34 | 31 | 67 | 13 | 19 | 1.6 | .9 | 2.8 | .11 | 65 |
| 10 November | 110 | 33 | 30 | 66 | 15 | 23 | 1.3 | .8 | 2.2 | .38 | 63 |
| 11 November | 98 | 29 | 30 | 76 | 18 | 24 | 1.2 | .8 | 2.1 | .40 | 56 |
| 12 November | 105 | 29 | 28 | 67 | 17 | 25 | 1.1 | .7 | 1.8 | .86 | 56 |
| 13 November | 81 | 27 | 33 | 89 | 19 | 21 | 1.6 | .9 | 2.6 | .09 | 52 |
Abbreviations: AR, attack rate; CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
Univariate Analysis and Risk Estimates by Specific Food Items Exposures, by Date of Lunch at the Canteen of the Company Affected by the Enterocytozoon bieneusi Outbreak in Denmark, 2020
| Exposure | Exposed | Unexposed | 95% CI | % Cases | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Lunch menu) | Total | Cases | AR (%) | Total | Cases | AR (%) | RR | Low | Upper |
| Exposed |
| November 4 | |||||||||||
| Fish and rolled sausage sandwiches | 28 | 10 | 36 | 97 | 23 | 24 | 1.5 | .8 | 2.8 | .23 | 19 |
| Egg/shrimp and corned beef sandwiches | 32 | 19 | 59 | 86 | 14 | 16 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 6.4 | .00 | 37 |
| Fish and roast beef sandwiches | 34 | 9 | 27 | 84 | 21 | 25 | 1.1 | .5 | 2.1 | 1.00 | 17 |
| Potato and roast beef sandwiches | 14 | 4 | 29 | 106 | 27 | 26 | 1.1 | .5 | 2.7 | .75 | 8 |
| Avocado/tomato salad | 3 | 1 | 33 | 126 | 34 | 27 | 1.2 | .2 | 6.3 | 1.00 | 2 |
| Iceberg salad | 10 | 4 | 40 | 112 | 31 | 28 | 1.4 | .6 | 3.3 | .47 | 8 |
| Noodle salad | 26 | 7 | 27 | 97 | 28 | 29 | 0.9 | .5 | 1.9 | 1.00 | 13 |
| Carrot and raisin salad | 28 | 10 | 36 | 88 | 22 | 25 | 1.4 | .8 | 2.6 | .33 | 19 |
| Any (2) fish sandwiches | 59 | 18 | 31 | 66 | 15 | 23 | 1.3 | .7 | 2.4 | .42 | 35 |
| Any (2) fish or egg/shrimp sandwiches | 72 | 27 | 38 | 51 | 6 | 12 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 7.2 | .00 | 52 |
| November 5 | |||||||||||
| Cod roe sandwich | 13 | 3 | 23 | 106 | 29 | 27 | 0.8 | .3 | 2.4 | 1.00 | 6 |
| Ham and cheese sandwich | 43 | 16 | 37 | 77 | 15 | 20 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 3.5 | .05 | 31 |
| Smoked turkey sandwich | 19 | 5 | 26 | 94 | 24 | 26 | 1.0 | 5 | 2.4 | 1.00 | 10 |
| Pastrami sandwich | 15 | 6 | 40 | 103 | 23 | 22 | 1.8 | .9 | 3.7 | .20 | 12 |
| Broccoli salad | 24 | 7 | 29 | 87 | 21 | 24 | 1.2 | .6 | 2.5 | .60 | 13 |
| Baked vegetables salad | 9 | 3 | 33 | 107 | 25 | 23 | 1.4 | .5 | 3.8 | .45 | 6 |
| Pumpkin hummus | 8 | 4 | 50 | 108 | 26 | 24 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 4.5 | .20 | 8 |
| Green salad | 10 | 3 | 30 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 1.2 | .4 | 3.3 | .71 | 6 |
| November 6 | |||||||||||
| | 56 | 16 | 29 | 46 | 8 | 17 | 1.6 | .8 | 3.5 | .24 | 44 |
| Pasta salad | 14 | 4 | 29 | 81 | 17 | 21 | 1.4 | .5 | 3.5 | .50 | 8 |
| Baked vegetables salad | 8 | 4 | 50 | 87 | 17 | 20 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 5.8 | .07 | 8 |
| Pineapple salad | 20 | 7 | 35 | 75 | 15 | 20 | 1.8 | .8 | 3.7 | .23 | 13 |
| Chocolate cake | 43 | 16 | 37 | 59 | 9 | 15 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 5.0 | .02 | 31 |
| Tap water (during the 2 weeks) | 138 | 44 | 32 | 43 | 5 | 12 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 6.5 | .01 | 85 |
| Contact with symptomatic person (last 2 weeks) | 10 | 3 | 30 | 182 | 48 | 26 | 1.1 | .43 | 3.02 | .73 | 6 |
Abbreviations: AR, attack rate; CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
Mantel-Haenszel and Stratified Analysis, and Risk Estimates for Specific Food and Water Exposures, by Consumption of Egg/Shrimp and Corned Beef Sandwiches for Lunch at the Canteen of the Company Affected by the Enterocytozoon bieneusi Outbreak, Denmark, 2020
| Did Not Eat Egg/Shrimp and Corned Beef Sandwich | Ate Egg/Shrimp and Corned Beef Sandwich |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | RRc | 95% CI | RRMH | 95% CI | RR0 | 95% CI | RR1 | 95% CI | |||||
| Baked pumpkin salad | 2.3 | 1.2 | 4.4 | 1.2 | .8 | 1.9 | 1.0 | .7 | 1.5 | 2.2 | .4 | 13.0 | .40 |
| Chocolate cake | 2.4 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.2 | .9 | 1.7 | 1.7 | .6 | 5.3 | .58 |
| Baked vegetables salad | 2.6 | 1.1 | 5.8 | 1.6 | .8 | 3.2 | 1.3 | .7 | 2.3 | Inf | … | … | … |
| Tap water (during the 2 weeks) | 2.7 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 1.2 | .9 | 1.6 | 1.0 | .8 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 4.4 | .04 |
Woolf test of homogeneity was used to assess statistically significant associations on effect modification.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RRc, relative risk (crude); RRMH, relative risk (Mantel-Haenszel adjusted); RR0, relative risk for stratum 0 (not exposed); RR1, relative risk for stratum 1 (exposed).