Literature DB >> 34790756

Hyperuricemia prevalence and its association with metabolic disorders: a multicenter retrospective real-world study in China.

Shuguang Pang1,2, Qiang Jiang1, Pei Sun1, Yi Li3, Yanhua Zhu3, Jin Liu3, Xiaoran Ye4, Ting Chen4, Fei Zhao5, Wenjun Yang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of hyperuricemia (HUA) and gout continues to increase in China. Research suggests that HUA may be related to many diseases other than gout. However, further population research is required to investigate the association between HUA and metabolic syndromes. This study sought to investigate the prevalence of HUA in an average population in China, and the association between serum uric acid (UA) levels and related metabolic disorders.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective real-world study examined the hospital information system data of 4 tertiary hospitals in 3 provinces in China. The data of patients aged between 18 and 80 years, who had attended at least 1 medical appointment at which their UA level was recorded, were analyzed to evaluate associations between UA levels and metabolic disorders.
RESULTS: Among the 374,506 enrolled subjects (49.7% male; mean age 51.5 years old), the overall prevalence of HUA and gout were 14.8% and 0.5%, respectively. The prevalence was higher among males than females (17.6% vs. 12.0%, 0.8% vs. 0.1%; both P<0.001). Groups exhibiting higher UA levels had increased adjusted odds ratios for dyslipidemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in both sexes. Changes in UA levels from the baseline were negatively correlated with changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and hemoglobin A1c among both sexes (all P<0.001), and were positively correlated with changes in total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (all P<0.05) among males, and changes in TC, TG, LDL-C and glucose (all P<0.001) among females.
CONCLUSIONS: HUA is associated with dyslipidemia and CKD both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Similar phenomena were observed in both sexes. 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hyperuricemia (HUA); metabolic disorder; serum uric acid level; sex difference

Year:  2021        PMID: 34790756      PMCID: PMC8576711          DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-5052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Hyperuricemia (HUA) is considered the main cause of gout owing to the accumulation of uric acid crystals (1). According to epidemiological studies, HUA may be related to obesity caused by a diet rich in purine, alcohol, meat, and soft drinks (2,3). In recent decades, HUA has become a common metabolic disorder worldwide (4). A meta-analysis indicates that the pooled prevalence of HUA was 13.3% in mainland China from 2000 to 2014 (5). Another survey showed that the prevalence of HUA was higher in southern (19.9% for men and 9.3% for women) and rural (20.1% for men and 9.0% for women) areas than northern (17.0% for men and 6.7% for women) and urban (16.4% for men and 6.6% for women) areas (6). Serum uric acid (UA) is known to be associated with cardiovascular, kidney and metabolic diseases and its components such as hyperglycaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia and obesity (7). Lipid has been found to have a stronger association with UA than any other metabolic syndrome components, but the role of a single lipid species associated with UA levels was found to vary in different populations (8-10). According to previous research, in both sexes, serum triglyceride (TG) has the strongest association with HUA in the Chinese population (11). Individuals with higher levels of UA are at a higher future risk of type 2 diabetes independent of other known risk factors (12,13). Previous studies have confirmed that insulin resistance exists in gout patients (14). However, UA is negatively correlated with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in type 2 diabetes patients, and positively correlated with HbA1c in normal glucose serum (15). HUA is also associated with hypertension in a certain Chinese population (16). Additionally, UA is an important biomarker and a potentially treatable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (7). Increased uric acid levels appear to be associated with an increased incidence of acute myocardial infarction, stroke and, chronic heart failure in middle-aged subjects with prior CVD (17,18). It will assist readers if this is stated. U-shaped association between uric acid levels and cardiovascular mortality exists in both women and men (19), which may be due to the protective role of uric acid as an antioxidant (20). Data on the association between HUA and metabolic syndromes in the Chinese population is limited (6,21,22). This study sought to investigate associations among UA and related diseases using Chinese hospital data from urban areas in 3 provinces and to explore the sex-specific association of serum uric acid dynamics with the incidence of metabolism-related diseases and biochemical measurements. We present the following article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5052).

Methods

Study design

A multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional, real-world study was conducted. The prevalence of HUA and gout overall and in male and female populations was analyzed. The factors affecting differences in prevalence between males and females were also investigated. In addition, associations among UA and metabolism-related diseases and metabolism-related biochemical measurements were assessed. Associations between changes in UA levels from the baseline and changes in metabolism-related biochemical measurements from the baseline were also examined. The enrolled subjects were categorized using prespecified sex-specific cut-off values for UA levels (male cut-off: 7, 8, and 9 mg/dL; female cut-off: 6, 7, and 8 mg/dL). The lowest cut-off values were set as the top values of the normal range for UA in both sexes, and the higher cut-off represented every 1 mg/dL increase of UA level (23). The index medical appointment at which the UA measurement of each patient was taken was set as the baseline for the cross-sectional analysis. Using the index visit and the follow-up visit data of the participants, a retrospective cohort was established.

Setting

This study was based on de-identified hospital information system (HIS) data collected from 4 tertiary hospitals in 3 provinces of China from July 2012 to January 2018.

Participants

A total of 432,002 patients, who had attended at least 1 medical appointment at which their UA level was recorded, were screened. After excluding those with missing date of birth or sex data (N=85), those aged <18 years (N=35,392), and those aged >80 years (N=22,019), 374,506 adult participants were identified and enrolled in this study (see ). Of these, there were data of at least 1 follow-up UA level (after the baseline level) for 114,054 participants. These data were studied to examine correlations among UA changes and metabolism-related biomarker changes. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by committee ethics board of Jinan Central Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China (No. 2020-026-01). Individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.
Figure 1

Population screening scheme.

Population screening scheme.

Variable

In this study, prevalence was defined as the proportion of patients with a specific disease and the whole population enrolled in the study. Subgroup population was defined as the denominator for the subgroup analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for the association analysis between UA levels and related diseases. The definitions of diseases are as follows: ❖ Dyslipidemia: patients with diagnoses of dyslipidemia, or those prescribed lipid-lowering medication, or those with a total cholesterol (TC) level ≥5.72 mmol/L, or a TG level >1.70 mmol/L, or a high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) level <0.91 mmol/L; ❖ Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): patients with a prescribed intake of hypoglycemic agents or insulin, or serum with a Hb1Ac level ≥6.5%, or a fasting blood glucose level ≥7 mmol/L, or a 2-hour postprandial glucose level ≥11.1 mmol/L (24), excluding those with type 1 diabetes mellitus; ❖ Hypertension: Patients with diagnoses of stroke, coronary arterial disease or heart failure (who were subsumed under the cardio-cerebrovascular cases category), hypertension, or with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg, or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg (25); ❖ Chronic kidney disease (CKD): patients with diagnoses of CKD, or a kidney disease as diagnosed at the index visit and at an earlier visit at least 90 days before the index visit; ❖ Kidney and ureter calculus: patients with diagnoses of calculus of the kidney and ureter.

Data sources

The data used in this study are from the HISs of 4 tertiary hospitals.

Bias

We included the related factors (age, center, hypertension, glucose TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C) into the model to adjust for the potential bias.

Study size

The sample size in this study was determined by applying screening criteria in real-world settings.

Outliers

For the data of measurements, including Hb1Ac level, glucose level, TC, TG, HDL-C, SBP, DBP, and UA level, no outliers were found.

Statistical methods

The data are reported as mean ± standard deviation for the normally distributed continuous variables, median and interquartile range for the non-normally distributed continuous variables, and proportions for the categorical variables. Differences between any 2 groups were compared using a t-test for the normally distributed continuous variables, a Wilcoxon test for the non-normally distributed continuous variables, and a Chi-squared test or Fisher test for the categorical variables. The Chi-squared test was also used to examine trends in proportions across groups with different UA levels. A Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the correlations among the continuous variables and uric acid levels. A multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to analyze associations among UA levels and dyslipidemia, T2DM, cardio-cerebral vascular disease, and CKD adjusting for demographic and clinical features. ORs and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to assess the linear associations among UA and biochemical parameters both as continuous variables.

Results

Of the 374,506 patients, 49.7% were male, and 50.3% were female. The mean age at the time at which the investigation was conducted of the overall test group, male population, and female population was 51.53, 51.62 and 51.43 years, respectively. The overall prevalence of HUA and gout were 14.8% and 0.5%, respectively, and there were no significant differences within different provinces. Notably, Significant differences were observed between the sexes. The prevalence was higher in males than in females (17.6% vs. 12.0%, 0.8% vs. 0.1%; both P<0.001). Male patients with elevated UA levels had a decreased mean age, HDL-C level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), but increased prevalence rates for gout and CKD (see ). Females with elevated UA levels had a decreased mean HDL-C level and eGFR, but an increased mean C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and prevalence rates for diseases, including gout, composite and individual cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, and CKD (see ).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of adult males by uric acid levels

CharacteristicsUA <7.0 mg/dL7.0 mg/dL ≤ UA <8.0 mg/dL8.0 mg/dL ≤ UA < 9.0 mg/dLUA ≥9.0 mg/dLP
N (% of all males)154,074 (82.7%)16,681 (9%)7,635 (4.1%)7,917 (4.2%)
Demographics
   Age (years)52.72±15.4347.69±15.8546.3±15.8343.77±16.77<0.001
Lab examination
   TG (mmol/L)1.15 (0.84)1.54 (1.16)1.64 (1.3)1.57 (1.36)<0.001
   TC (mmol/L)4.48±1.044.75±1.094.76±1.124.61±1.22<0.001
   HDL-C (mmol/L)1.12±0.311.07±0.281.05±0.281±0.31<0.001
   LDL-C (mmol/L)2.69±0.812.84±0.852.82±0.862.71±0.91<0.001
   CRP (mg/L)7.82±38.015.35±20.36.19±21.88.23±24.78<0.001
   Glucose (mmol/L)5.4±1.45.4±1.195.41±1.225.4±1.2<0.001
   HbA1c (%)6±1.96±1.25.9±1.26.0±1.3<0.001
   eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)100.61±19.4394.95±25.8592.44±29.3490.82±35.19<0.001
   SBP (mmHg)130.97±18.43132.21±19.05132.72±21.34130.31±21.890.09
   DBP (mmHg)78.85±11.780.64±12.3780.92±12.7479.72±13.52<0.001
Comorbidities (%)
   Hyperuricemia0.4100100100<0.001
   Gout0.53.27.712.2<0.001
   Dyslipidemia48.757.757.651<0.001
   Type 2 diabetes mellitus13.39.38.58.5<0.001
   Hypertension30.831.431.329.60.654
   Cardio-cerebrovascular disease27.522.721.822.8<0.001
   Stroke12.78.58.27.4<0.001
   Coronary arterial disease17.515.71515.3<0.001
   Heart failure7.77.38.410.9<0.001
   Chronic kidney disease2.24.86.99.5<0.001
   Calculus of kidney and ureter1.61.92.41.8<0.001

CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Table 2

Baseline characteristics of adult females by uric acid levels

CharacteristicsUA <6.0 mg/dL6.0 mg/dL ≤ UA <7.0 mg/dL7.0 mg/dL ≤ UA <8.0 mg/dLUA ≥8.0 mg/dLP
N (% of all females)165,678 (88%)12,512 (6.6%)5,028 (2.7%)4,981 (2.6%)
Demographics
   Age (years)51.3±15.8953.7±17.1852.29±18.349.22±19.360.359
Lab examination
   TG (mmol/L)1.14 (0.81)1.54 (1.06)1.64 (1.2)1.51 (1.19)<0.001
   TC (mmol/L)4.83±1.075.07±1.165.02±1.224.76±1.33<0.001
   HDL-C (mmol/L)1.29±0.331.2±0.321.16±0.321.09±0.39<0.001
   LDL-C (mmol/L)2.83±0.853±0.92.96±0.952.79±1.00<0.001
   CRP (mg/L)4.1 (17.4)4.35 (12.96)4.43 (15.03)4.99 (16.54)0.078
   Glucose (mmol/L)5.24 (1.18)5.43 (1.46)5.42 (1.49)5.3 (1.4)<0.001
   HbA1c (%)6.0 (1.6)6.3 (1.6)6.3 (1.5)6.4 (1.7)<0.001
   eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)103.57±19.7390.37±28.3286.04±33.3783.47±38.28<0.001
   SBP (mmHg)127.68±18.86129.96±19.47130.39±21.4129.68±23.67<0.001
   DBP (mmHg)76.43±11.1677.83±11.8678.54±13.2276.57±13.94<0.001
Comorbidities (%)
   Hyperuricemia0.1100100100<0.001
   Gout0.10.30.61.6<0.001
   Dyslipidemia42.357.858.951<0.001
   Type 2 diabetes mellitus10.813.714.113.1<0.001
   Hypertension25.533.636.636.5<0.001
   Cardio-cerebrovascular disease23.128.930.133.2<0.001
   Stroke7.888.49.8<0.001
   Coronary arterial disease17.523.62425.8<0.001
   Heart failure7.511.313.417.4<0.001
   Chronic kidney disease1.65.21012.7<0.001
   Calculus of kidney and ureter0.80.80.61.10.618

CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides. CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Associations among UA levels and metabolism-related diseases

In relation to the lowest (normal) UA level male group, higher UA level groups had significantly increased adjusted ORs (aORs) for dyslipidemia and CKD, and a decreased aOR for T2DM. Male patients with a UA level ≥9.0 mg/dL were more likely to have cardio-cerebrovascular events than those with normal UA levels (see ). The associations between UA levels and diseases were similar among females, except that female in higher UA level groups did not have a significantly different aOR for T2DM than those in the lowest UA level group (see ).
Table 3

Associations between uric acid levels and metabolism-related diseases among adult males

UA levelsaOR95% CIP value
Dyslipidemiaa
   UA level 1 (<7.0 mg/dL)Ref
   UA level 2 (7.0 to <8.0 mg/dL)1.661.58–1.74<0.001
   UA level 3 (8.0 to <9.0 mg/dL)1.881.76–2.02<0.001
   UA level 4 (≥9.0 mg/dL)1.891.75–2.05<0.001
Type 2 diabetes mellitusb
   UA level 1 (<7.0 mg/dL)Ref
   UA level 2 (7.0 to <8.0 mg/dL)0.650.60–0.70<0.001
   UA level 3 (8.0 to <9.0 mg/dL)0.590.53–0.67<0.001
   UA level 4 (≥9.0 mg/dL)0.740.65–0.84<0.001
Chronic kidney diseasec
   UA level 1 (<7.0 mg/dL)Ref
   UA level 2 (7.0 to <8.0 mg/dL)2.272–2.59<0.001
   UA level 3 (8.0 to <9.0 mg/dL)3.693.15–4.32<0.001
   UA level 4 (≥9.0 mg/dL)5.374.59–6.3<0.001
Cardio-cerebrovascular diseased
   UA level 1 (<7.0 mg/dL)Ref
   UA level 2 (7.0 to <8.0 mg/dL)1.020.96–1.090.523
   UA level 3 (8.0 to <9.0 mg/dL)1.070.97–1.180.207
   UA level 4 (≥9.0 mg/dL)1.211.08–1.36<0.001

Among adult males, the number of dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, cardio-cerebrovascular disease is 93,094, 23,365, 5,469, 49,626, respectively. a, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, and glucose; b, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C; c, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and glucose; d, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and glucose. CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Table 4

Associations between uric acid levels and metabolism-related diseases among adult females

UA levelsaOR95% CIP value
Dyslipidemia
   UA level 1 (<6.0 mg/dL)Ref
   UA level 2 (6.0 to <7.0 mg/dL)1.781.69–1.87<0.001
   UA level 3 (7.0 to <8.0 mg/dL)2.061.90–2.24<0.001
   UA level 4 (≥8.0 mg/dL)1.891.71–2.08<0.001
Type 2 diabetes mellitusb
   UA level 1 (<6.0 mg/dL)Ref
   UA level 2 (6.0 to <7.0 mg/dL)0.990.92–1.070.826
   UA level 3 (7.0 to <8.0 mg/dL)1.010.90–1.140.830
   UA level 4 (≥8.0 mg/dL)1.080.95–1.230.227
Chronic kidney diseasec
   UA level 1 (<6.0 mg/dL)Ref
   UA level 2 (6.0 to <7.0 mg/dL)2.922.54–3.35<0.001
   UA level 3 (7.0 to <8.0 mg/dL)5.724.84–6.77<0.001
   UA level 4 (≥8.0 mg/dL)8.697.30–10.33<0.001
Cardio-cerebrovascular diseased
   UA level 1 (<6.0 mg/dL)Ref
   UA level 2 (6.0 to <7.0 mg/dL)1.050.98–1.120.204
   UA level 3 (7.0 to <8.0 mg/dL)1.020.91–1.140.785
   UA level 4 (≥8.0 mg/dL)1.181.03–1.350.014

Among adult females, the number of dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, cardio-cerebrovascular disease is 82,816, 20,969, 4,437, 45,055, respectively. a, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, and glucose; b, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C; c, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and glucose; d, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and glucose. CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Among adult males, the number of dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, cardio-cerebrovascular disease is 93,094, 23,365, 5,469, 49,626, respectively. a, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, and glucose; b, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C; c, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and glucose; d, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and glucose. CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides. Among adult females, the number of dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, cardio-cerebrovascular disease is 82,816, 20,969, 4,437, 45,055, respectively. a, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, and glucose; b, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C; c, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and glucose; d, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and glucose. CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Associations among UA levels and metabolism-related biochemical measurements

Among the male subjects, UA was found to be negatively associated with HDL-C, CRP, glucose, HbA1c, eGFR and SBP, but positively associated with TG, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (see ).
Table 5

Correlation and coefficient between SUA levels’ change and metabolism-related biochemical measurements’ change among adult males and females (correlation analysis, ΔSUA as independent variable)

ΔSUAMaleFemale
β95% CIP valueβ95% CIP value
ΔTCa0.001−0.001–0.0020.2730.0030.001–0.005<0.001
ΔTGb0.0650.063–0.067<0.0010.0640.061–0.067<0.001
ΔHDL-Cc−0.007−0.008 to −0.006<0.001−0.013−0.014 to −0.012<0.001
ΔLDL-Cd0.0050.004–0.006<0.0010.0030.002–0.005<0.001
ΔCRPa−1.593−1.983 to −1.202<0.0010.171−0.292–0.6350.468
ΔGlucosee−0.111−0.119 to −0.103<0.001−0.045−0.054 to −0.036<0.001
ΔHbA1cf−0.036−0.044 to −0.028<0.001−0.009−0.019 to −0.0010.078
ΔeGFRa−4.202−4.276 to −4.128<0.001−4.81−4.894 to −4.727<0.001
ΔSBPa−0.007−0.008 to −0.006<0.001−0.008−0.118–0.1030.893
ΔDBPa0.015−0.038–0.0680.572−0.054−0.12–0.0120.108

a, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, glucose; b, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, glucose; c, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TC, TG, LDL-C, glucose; d, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TC, TG, HDL-C, glucose; e, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and DM treatment; f, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, glucose, and DM treatment. SUA, serum uric acid; CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

a, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, glucose; b, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, glucose; c, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TC, TG, LDL-C, glucose; d, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TC, TG, HDL-C, glucose; e, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and DM treatment; f, adjusted for age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, glucose, and DM treatment. SUA, serum uric acid; CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides. Among the female subjects, UA was found to be negatively associated with HDL-C, glucose, and eGFR, but positively associated with TC, TG, and LDL-C (see ).

Associations among UA level changes from the baseline and changes in metabolism-related biochemical measurements from the baseline

We established a retrospective cohort comprising 114,054 participants with follow-up UA data. The median interval from the baseline assessment to the latest follow-up UA level assessment of patients in the cohort was 98.9 days. Changes in UA from the baseline were negatively correlated with changes in eGFR and HbA1c from the baseline (r=–0.319 and –0.074; both P<0.001) and positively correlated with changes in blood glucose, TC, TG, LDL-C, (r=0.110, 0.144, 0.082, and 0.012 respectively; all P<0.05), however, no correlation was found with HDL-C among males. After adjusting the covariates, changes in UA levels were found to be negatively correlated with changes in eGFR and HbA1c, and positively correlated with changes in TC, TG, LDL-C, and glucose (see and ).
Table 6

Multivariate linear regression analysis of the association between change of serum uric acid from baseline and change of metabolism-related biochemical measurements from baseline among males and females

VariablesMaleFemale
β95% CIP valueβ95% CIP value
eGFRa−4.199−4.315 to −4.082<0.001−4.464−4.599 to −4.329<0.001
TCa0.0530.046–0.061<0.0010.0670.058–0.076<0.001
TGb0.0650.059–0.071<0.0010.0780.071–0.085<0.001
LDL-Cc0.0380.032–0.044<0.0010.0420.037–0.047<0.001
HDL-Cd0.001−0.002–0.0030.607−0.005−0.008 to −0.002<0.001
Glucosee0.0400.023–0.058<0.0010.0370.017–0.056<0.001
HbA1ce−0.035−0.052 to −0.018<0.001−0.030−0.048 to −0.0110.002

a, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and glucose; b, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and glucose; c, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TC, TG, HDL-C, and glucose; d, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TC, TG, LDL-C, and glucose; e, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C. CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Figure 2

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among males.

Figure 3

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in total cholesterol (TC) among males.

Figure 4

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in triglyceride (TG) among males.

Figure 5

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among males.

Figure 6

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) among males.

Figure 7

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in blood glucose among males.

Figure 8

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among males.

a, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and glucose; b, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and glucose; c, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TC, TG, HDL-C, and glucose; d, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TC, TG, LDL-C, and glucose; e, adjusted for sex, age, center, hypertension, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C. CRP, C-reactive protein; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among males. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in total cholesterol (TC) among males. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in triglyceride (TG) among males. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among males. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) among males. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in blood glucose among males. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among males. Among females, changes in UA from the baseline measurement were negatively correlated with changes in eGFR, HDL-C, and HbA1c from the baseline measurements (r=–0.317, –0.025, and –0.052; all P<0.001) and positively correlated with changes in TC, TG, and LDL-C (r=0.094, 0.147, 0.073 respectively; all P<0.001). After adjusting the covariates, changes in UA were found to be significantly negatively associated with changes in eGFR, HDL-C, and HbA1c, but positively correlated with changes in TC, TG, LDL-C, and glucose (see and ).
Figure 9

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among females.

Figure 10

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in total cholesterol (TC) among females.

Figure 11

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in triglyceride (TG) among females.

Figure 12

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among females.

Figure 13

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) among females.

Figure 14

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in blood glucose among females.

Figure 15

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among females.

Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among females. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in total cholesterol (TC) among females. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in triglyceride (TG) among females. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among females. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) among females. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in blood glucose among females. Correlation between changes in serum uric acid (UA) and changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among females.

Discussion

This research examined the prevalence of HUA in populations from 3 provinces. In light of the different characteristics between the sexes found in previous studies (26,27), male and female subjects were analyzed separately. HUA was defined as UA ≥7.0 mg/dL in males or ≥6.0 mg/dL in females. Using this criterion, the enrolled HUA subjects were subsequently subdivided into 3 groups based on the prescribed cut-off values, and a statistical analysis was carried out. Under the newly published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HUA and gout in China (28), the UA cut-off value used to diagnose HUA has been redefined as ≥420 µmol/L (7 mg/dL) in both sexes. However, in this retrospective study, we continued to use the former standard to ensure conformity with real-world clinical practice in China during the study period. As shows, the percentages of cardio-cerebrovascular disease in the reference group were higher than those in other groups; however, as the aOR was >1 (see ) there might be reasons for this. First, the aOR for cardio-cerebrovascular disease in was adjusted for age, center, hypertension, and glucose. Second, due to missing data, the population used for the multivariate logistic regression was a subset of the population for . Nationwide epidemiological data for HUA in China remains limited. Previous studies from different periods and regions have indicated that the prevalence of HUA continues to increase (5). Research has shown that the prevalence of HUA was 6.9–27.30% in men and 3.65–15.33% in women (22,29-31). In this study, the severity of HUA was assessed using UA levels. Consistent with the results of previous regional epidemiological studies, we found that the total prevalence of HUA was 17.6% in men and 12.0% in women. More than half of the patients with HUA were categorized into the mild group (men: 7.0–8.0 mg/dL, women: 6.0–7.0 mg/dL). Female patients with HUA were more likely to be older than males and to be post-menopausal. The reason for this may be related to the change in estradiol (32), which is considered to play a protective role in regulating UA. Similar to our findings, a meta-analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of gout in the Chinese population was 1.1%, and is remarkably higher in men (1.5%) than women (0.9%) (5). HUA is often accompanied by hyperlipidemia. This may be because lipid metabolism disorders and uric acid metabolism share mutual influence mechanisms. Increased serum lipid, especially TG, is positively correlated with UA (33), and elevated TG is an independent risk factor of HUA (34). Serum LDL, TC, and the ratio of TG to HDL are positively correlated with UA level, while HDL level is negatively correlated with UA level (35). In this study, we observed that TG, TC, and LDL increased as UA increased, while HDL was decreased. Consistent with previous studies, TG appeared to be more relevant than the other lipid indexes. Further, adults with HUA showed a higher possibility of concomitant dyslipidemia. Previously, HUA was thought to be a predictor of insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. HUA and insulin resistance can be interactive (36). Increased UA levels may be related to abnormal glucose tolerance, which may ultimately develop into diabetes mellitus (37). HUA with diabetes or abnormal glucose tolerance accounted for 31% to 55% (38). Similar to previous studies (27,39), we found that UA levels were negatively correlated with blood glucose levels in both sexes at the baseline. This might be due to hyperfiltration caused by hyperglycemia, which can enhance the excretion of UA. Emerging evidence suggests that HUA is associated with an increased risk of incidence and the progression of CKD (40). The results of previous studies on the association between UA with CKD in different sexes have been mixed (41-44). Despite lower concentrations of UA in females, the association between HUA and CKD in females was significantly stronger than that in males (23), demonstrated by eGFR measurement and CKD prevalence. The association between UA and CKD is consistent with our conclusion. Further, in our study, the prevalence of calculus of the kidney and ureter was associated with HUA in males, but this association was statistically non-significant in females. Similar to our findings, epidemiological evidence supports an association between UA and the incidence of hypertension. Many observational studies have suggested that an increased risk of hypertension incidence may be independently caused by elevated UA levels (45-48). A previous study suggested that the risk of high blood pressure in men with a UA level >7.0 mg/dL was 80% higher than the risk at norm uricemia (49). Sex differences also exist. Notably, the prevalence of hypertension in HUA patients increased by 1.7 times in men and 3.4 times in women (50). We found a positive correlation between UA and hypertension both in SBP and DBP. Further, we found that this association was stronger in women than in men. This is probably because the average age of patients with HUA is higher in women than man, and older people are at higher risk of hypertension. HUA is a risk factor for cardiovascular events, development, and death (51). Our study showed that HUA is associated with a clustering of major CVD risk factors in the Chinese population. Further, we observed the prevalence of cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, including stroke, heart failure, and coronary arterial disease. As stated above, women with a higher age showed a stronger prevalence than men. This study had several limitations. First, the relationship between UA and metabolism-related diseases was examined using cross-sectional data, and causality was not considered due to the lack of retrospective real-world data. Second, the retrospective real-world data were fully based on HIS and digital platforms, and the population enrolled were all subjects who sought healthcare services; thus, the overall population was not totally represented in the test group. Third, while we conducted an exploration of longitudinal data based on the retrospective cohort, the rate of loss in the follow-up data was high in the real-world setting. Finally, some potential confounders were not included in this study due to the data accessibility in the databases consulted, such as body weight, body mass index, insulin level and smoking and drinking history, resulted in the lack of subsequent analysis. The prevention and treatment of uncertainties in real world study concludes a more principled approach to design and analysis in the presence of missing data. A careful design and conduct to limit the amount and impact of missing data. In conclusion, we used large-scale retrospective HIS data to examine the sex-specific relationship among UA levels and metabolism-related diseases in Chinese patients. The sex-specific prevalence of HUA was observed in the Chinese population. The elevated prevalence of some metabolism-related diseases might be associated with elevated UA levels in both male and female Chinese patients in real-world settings. Notably, both our cross-sectional and longitudinal results revealed that HUA was associated with dyslipidemia and CKD in both sexes. The article’s supplementary files as
  48 in total

1.  Gender difference in the association of hyperuricemia with chronic kidney disease in southern China.

Authors:  Zhibin Li; Qinghua Liu; Haiping Mao; Zhijian Li; Xiuqing Dong; Yongwen Liu; Jianxiong Lin; Weiqing Chen; Hui Wang; Richard J Johnson; Xueqing Yu; Wei Chen
Journal:  Kidney Blood Press Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.687

2.  Prevalence of hyperuricemia and its correlates in rural Northeast Chinese population: from lifestyle risk factors to metabolic comorbidities.

Authors:  Shasha Yu; Hongmei Yang; Xiaofan Guo; Xingang Zhang; Ying Zhou; Qiaoyun Ou; Liqiang Zheng; Yingxian Sun
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Relationships among hyperuricemia, endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Paolo Puddu; Giovanni M Puddu; Eleonora Cravero; Luca Vizioli; Antonio Muscari
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Hyperuricemia and incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter C Grayson; Seo Young Kim; Michael LaValley; Hyon K Choi
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Community-based study on elderly CKD subjects and the associated risk factors.

Authors:  Yan-Ping Huang; Tao Zheng; Dan-Huan Zhang; Ling-Yun Chen; Pei-Jv Mao
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.606

Review 6.  Hyperuricemia, Hypertension, and Chronic Kidney Disease: an Emerging Association.

Authors:  Samir G Mallat; Sahar Al Kattar; Bassem Y Tanios; Abdo Jurjus
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Uric acid and incident kidney disease in the community.

Authors:  Daniel E Weiner; Hocine Tighiouart; Essam F Elsayed; John L Griffith; Deeb N Salem; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Hyperuricemia is independently associated with coronary heart disease and renal dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ito; Mariko Abe; Mizuo Mifune; Koshiro Oshikiri; Shinichi Antoku; Yuichiro Takeuchi; Michiko Togane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relationship between hyperuricemia and lipid profiles in US adults.

Authors:  Tao-Chun Peng; Chung-Ching Wang; Tung-Wei Kao; James Yi-Hsin Chan; Ya-Hui Yang; Yaw-Wen Chang; Wei-Liang Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Two-Year Changes in Hyperuricemia and Risk of Diabetes: A Five-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Lixin Tao; Zhan Zhao; Yongmin Mu; Dechun Zou; Jingbo Zhang; Xiuhua Guo
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 4.011

View more
  2 in total

1.  Muscle Fat Content Is Strongly Associated With Hyperuricemia: A Cross-Sectional Study in Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Ningxin Chen; Tingting Han; Hongxia Liu; Jie Cao; Wenwen Liu; Didi Zuo; Ting Zhang; Xiucai Lan; Xian Jin; Yurong Weng; Yaomin Hu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Probiotic effects of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 1155 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum 2644 on hyperuricemic rats.

Authors:  Yanjun Li; Jun Zhu; Guodong Lin; Kan Gao; Yunxia Yu; Su Chen; Lie Chen; Zuoguo Chen; Li Li
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.