| Literature DB >> 34789725 |
Takashi X Fujisawa1,2,3, Daiki Hiraoka1,4, Kai Makita1,2, Shota Nishitani1,2,3,5, Shinichiro Takiguchi6, Shoko Hamamura1,2,6, Akiko Yao1,2, Koji Shimada1,2,3,7, Alicia K Smith5, Akemi Tomoda8,9,10,11.
Abstract
Child maltreatment dysregulates the brain's oxytocinergic system, resulting in dysfunctional attachment patterns. However, how the oxytocinergic system in children who are maltreated (CM) is epigenetically affected remains unknown. We assessed differences in salivary DNA methylation of the gene encoding oxytocin (OXT) between CM (n = 24) and non-CM (n = 31), alongside its impact on brain structures and functions using multi-modal brain imaging (voxel-based morphometry, diffusion tensor imaging, and task and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging). We found that CM showed higher promoter methylation than non-CM, and nine CpG sites were observed to be correlated with each other and grouped into one index (OXTmi). OXTmi was significantly negatively correlated with gray matter volume (GMV) in the left superior parietal lobule (SPL), and with right putamen activation during a rewarding task, but not with white matter structures. Using a random forest regression model, we investigated the sensitive period and type of maltreatment that contributed the most to OXTmi in CM, revealing that they were 5-8 years of age and physical abuse (PA), respectively. However, the presence of PA (PA+) was meant to reflect more severe cases, such as prolonged exposure to multiple types of abuse, than the absence of PA. PA+ was associated with significantly greater functional connectivity between the right putamen set as the seed and the left SPL and the left cerebellum exterior. The results suggest that OXT promoter hypermethylation may lead to the atypical development of reward and visual association structures and functions, thereby potentially worsening clinical aspects raised by traumatic experiences.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34789725 PMCID: PMC8599663 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01714-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 6.222
Fig. 1Localization and structure of the OXT gene on chromosome 20 (GRCh37/hg19) and the location of the CpG probes from EPIC (upper) and CpG fragments from EpiTYPER (lower).
The t statistics represent the results of multiple regression analyses between each CpG and child maltreatment. Closed and open red circles represent FDR < 0.05, and FDR < 0.10, respectively. The light pink shaded area represents the clustered region defined by a factor analysis.
Fig. 2Results of the multiple regression analysis between OXTmi and the regional gray matter volume (GMV).
A Brain region showing negative correlations between the degree of OXTmi and GMV in the left SPL (x = −17, y = −56, z = 65 [BA 7], T = 4.50, cluster size = 157 voxels) as determined by the multiple regression analysis. The statistical threshold for the contrasts was voxel-level P < 0.001 uncorrected for height and cluster-level P < 0.05 FDR-corrected for multiple comparisons. The color bar denotes the t-statistic range. B Brain activation map based on a meta-analysis of 118 studies related to the term “action observation,” which was the most significant term associated with the left SPL revealed by “NeuroSynth” [40].
Fig. 3Results of the multiple regression analysis between OXTmi and the regional function for monetary reward task.
Brain region showing negative correlations between the degree of OXTmi and activation in the right putamen (x = 26, y = 16, z = −4, T = 4.26, cluster size = 165 voxels) after correcting for age, sex, and FSIQ as determined by multiple regression analysis. The statistical threshold for the contrasts was voxel-level P < 0.001 uncorrected for height, corrected to P < 0.05 using the cluster size. The color bar represents the T-statistic range.
Multiple linear regression results of OXTmi for the association with the clinical symptoms.
| Total | CM ( | Non-CM ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistics | Statistics | Statistics | |||||||
| CATS totala | 0.29 | 2.21 | 0.03* | 0.53 | 2.30 | 0.04* | −0.27 | −1.80 | 0.09 |
| SDQ totalb | 0.17 | 1.34 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.74 | −0.10 | −0.60 | 0.56 |
| CBCL totalc | −0.07 | −0.49 | 0.62 | −0.16 | −0.81 | 0.43 | −0.22 | −1.63 | 0.12 |
| DSRSCd | 0.13 | 1.00 | 0.32 | −0.06 | −0.29 | 0.78 | 0.007 | 0.04 | 0.97 |
| Secure | −0.09 | −0.80 | 0.43 | −0.04 | −0.16 | 0.88 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 0.60 |
| Avoidant | 0.08 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.80 | 0.06 | 0.43 | 0.67 |
| Ambivalent | 0.22 | 1.89 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 1.01 | 0.32 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.79 |
| Insecure | 0.18 | 1.50 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.77 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 0.40 | 0.69 |
CATS Child Abuse and Trauma Scale (Sanders and Becker-Lausen [30]), SDQ strengths and difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman [54]), CBCL Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach [32]), DSRSC depression self-rating scale for children (Birleson [31]), IWMS Internal Working Models Scale (Takuma and Toda [35]).
Bold values identify statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Some subjects’ data were not available:
aCATS (CM: n = 9, non-CM: n = 3).
bSDQ and IWMS (CM: n = 7).
cCBCL total (CM: n = 5).
dDSRSC (CM: n = 6).
*P < 0.05.
Fig. 4Results of the sensitivity analyses for maltreatment history in CM and their impact on the brain functional connectivities.
A Maximal sensitivity by age of exposure (regardless of type and number). Results of a random forest regression with conditional trees indicated the importance of exposure to early maltreatment from prenatal to 18 years of age on the OXTmi. Importance is indicated by degradation in fit, as suggested by the increase in mean square error (MSE), following effective elimination of each age from the model by permutation. B Maximal sensitivity by type and number of maltreatments (regardless of age of exposure). *P < 0.05 (uncorrected). †P < 0.10. C Structure of maltreatment history for each individual. Gray block: Not to reach the age, S sheltered, PA physical abuse, EA emotional abuse, NG neglect, SA sexual abuse, mother: biological mother, father: biological father, grandmo: grandmother, adpmo: adoptive mother, adpfa adoptive father. D PA+ (n = 7) vs. PA− (n = 4) comparison for resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI). The color bar denotes the T-statistic range.