Literature DB >> 34788582

Meta-Analysis of Lung Ultrasound Scores for Early Prediction of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Lucilla Pezza1, Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena2, Yasser Elsayed3, Nadya Yousef1, Luca Vedovelli4, Francesco Raimondi5, Daniele De Luca1,6.   

Abstract

Rationale: Lung ultrasound scores (LUS) might be useful in monitoring neonates with chronic pulmonary insufficiency of prematurity and in predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Given their ease of use, accuracy, and lack of invasiveness, LUS have been the subject of several recent studies.
Objectives: We sought to clarify whether LUS provide an accurate and early (within the first 2 wk of life) prediction of BPD in preterm infants of gestational age ⩽32 weeks.
Methods: This was a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis following PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis), and QUADAS (QUAlity of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) guidelines. Studies designed to predict BPD in the first 2 weeks of life using LUS were selected. A classical LUS (calculated for 6 chest areas) and its extended version (eLUS, 10 chest areas) were tested.
Results: Seven studies (1,027 neonates) were meta-analyzed. LUS and eLUS showed good diagnostic accuracy in predicting BPD at 7 and 14 days of life (area under the curve, 0.85-0.87; pooled sensitivity, 70-80%; pooled specificity, 80-87%). The diagnostic accuracy of LUS and eLUS did not differ at any time point (area under the curve difference always P > 0.05). Repeating the analyses without outliers or with moderate to severe BPD as the outcome yielded similar results. Meta-regressions showed that prenatal steroid prophylaxis and sex were not significant effect confounders. Conclusions: LUS are accurate for early prediction of BPD and moderate to severe BPD, in an average population of preterm infants ⩽32 weeks' gestation. The diagnostic accuracy is similar for LUS and eLUS, so the use of the simpler score should be advocated. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021233010.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bedside; bronchopulmonary dysplasia; lung ultrasound; prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34788582     DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202107-822OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  4 in total

1.  Neonatal cardiorespiratory imaging-a multimodality state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Christian J Kellenberger; Jovan Lovrenski; Thomas Semple; Pablo Caro-Domínguez
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 2.  Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sabrina Congedi; Federica Savio; Maria Auciello; Sabrina Salvadori; Daniel Nardo; Luca Bonadies
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  Prediction Models for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Peng; Yuan-Li Zhan; You Chen; Zhen-Chao Jin; Fang Liu; Bo Wang; Zhang-Bin Yu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 4.  The Value of Lung Ultrasound Score in Neonatology.

Authors:  Haifeng Zong; Zhifeng Huang; Jie Zhao; Bingchun Lin; Yongping Fu; Yanqing Lin; Peng Huang; Hongyan Sun; Chuanzhong Yang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.569

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.