Karen R Flórez1, Sophia E Day2, Terry T-K Huang1, Kevin J Konty2, Emily M D'Agostino3. 1. Center for Systems and Community Design, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. 2. NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of School Health, Queens, NY, USA. 3. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: Research showing that place of birth (POB) predicts excess weight gain and obesity risk among Latino adults has not prompted similar research in Latino children, although childhood is a critical period for preventing obesity. Objective: To identify differences in obesity risk among Latino children by POB. Methods: Longitudinal cohort observational study on public school children self-identified by parent/guardian as Latino in grades K-12 for school years 2006-07 through 2016-17 with measured weight and height (n = 570,172students; 3,103,642observations). POB reported by parent/guardian was categorized as continental United States [not New York City (NYC)] (n = 295,693), NYC (n = 166,361), South America (n = 19,452), Central America (n = 10,241), Dominican Republic (n = 57,0880), Puerto Rico (n = 9687), and Mexico (n = 9647). Age- and sex-specific BMI percentiles were estimated based on established growth charts. Data were analyzed in 2020. Results: Prevalence of obesity was highest among US (non-NYC)-born girls (21%) and boys (27%), followed by NYC-born girls (19%) and boys (25%). Among girls, South Americans (9%) had the lowest prevalence of all levels of obesity, while Puerto Ricans (19%) and Dominicans (15%) had the highest prevalence. Among boys, South Americans also had the lowest prevalence of all levels of obesity (15%), while Puerto Ricans (22%) and Mexicans (21%) had the highest. In adjusted models, obesity risk was highest in US (non-NYC)-born children, followed by children born in NYC (p < 0.001). Immigrant Latino children exhibited an advantage even after controlling for individual and neighborhood sociodemographic features, particularly Dominicans, South Americans, and Puerto Ricans. Conclusions: The heterogeneity of obesity risk among Latino children highlights the importance of POB.
Introduction: Research showing that place of birth (POB) predicts excess weight gain and obesity risk among Latino adults has not prompted similar research in Latino children, although childhood is a critical period for preventing obesity. Objective: To identify differences in obesity risk among Latino children by POB. Methods: Longitudinal cohort observational study on public school children self-identified by parent/guardian as Latino in grades K-12 for school years 2006-07 through 2016-17 with measured weight and height (n = 570,172students; 3,103,642observations). POB reported by parent/guardian was categorized as continental United States [not New York City (NYC)] (n = 295,693), NYC (n = 166,361), South America (n = 19,452), Central America (n = 10,241), Dominican Republic (n = 57,0880), Puerto Rico (n = 9687), and Mexico (n = 9647). Age- and sex-specific BMI percentiles were estimated based on established growth charts. Data were analyzed in 2020. Results: Prevalence of obesity was highest among US (non-NYC)-born girls (21%) and boys (27%), followed by NYC-born girls (19%) and boys (25%). Among girls, South Americans (9%) had the lowest prevalence of all levels of obesity, while Puerto Ricans (19%) and Dominicans (15%) had the highest prevalence. Among boys, South Americans also had the lowest prevalence of all levels of obesity (15%), while Puerto Ricans (22%) and Mexicans (21%) had the highest. In adjusted models, obesity risk was highest in US (non-NYC)-born children, followed by children born in NYC (p < 0.001). Immigrant Latino children exhibited an advantage even after controlling for individual and neighborhood sociodemographic features, particularly Dominicans, South Americans, and Puerto Ricans. Conclusions: The heterogeneity of obesity risk among Latino children highlights the importance of POB.
Entities:
Keywords:
body mass index; epidemiology; health disparities
Authors: R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson Journal: Adv Data Date: 2000-06-08
Authors: Carmen R Isasi; Christina M Parrinello; Guadalupe X Ayala; Alan M Delamater; Krista M Perreira; Martha L Daviglus; John P Elder; Ashley N Marchante; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Linda Van Horn; Mercedes R Carnethon Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Emily M D'Agostino; Sophia E Day; Kevin J Konty; Michael Larkin; Subir Saha; Katarzyna Wyka Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Jee-Young Moon; Tao Wang; Tamar Sofer; Kari E North; Carmen R Isasi; Jianwen Cai; Marc D Gellman; Ashley E Moncrieft; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Maria Argos; Robert C Kaplan; Qibin Qi Journal: Diabetes Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 9.461