| Literature DB >> 34786637 |
Haigang Cao1,2, Jieming Liu1,2, Tianning Du1,2, Yihao Liu1,2, Xiaoyu Zhang1,2, Yuan Guo1,2, Jie Wang1,2, Xiaomin Zhou1,2, Xiao Li1,2, Gongshe Yang1,2, Xin'e Shi3,4.
Abstract
The type of myofiber is related to the quality of meat. The slow oxidized myofiber helps to increase the tenderness and juiciness of muscle. Numerous studies have shown that circRNA plays a key role in skeletal muscle development. However, the role of circRNA in porcine skeletal myofiber types is unclear. In this study, we performed high-throughput RNA sequencing to study the differential expression of circRNA in the longissimus dorsi and the soleus muscle. A total of 40,757 circRNAs were identified, of which 181 were significantly different. Interestingly, some circRNAs were involved in metabolism pathways, AMPK, FoxO, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways. Besides, we focused on a novel circRNA-circMYLK4. By injecting circMYLK4-AAV into piglets, we found that circMYLK4 significantly increased the mRNA and protein levels of the slow muscle marker genes. In summary, our study laid an essential foundation for further research of circRNA in myofiber type conversion and higher meat quality.Entities:
Keywords: CircMYLK4; High throughput sequencing; Meat quality; Muscle fiber type; Pig
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34786637 PMCID: PMC8803689 DOI: 10.1007/s00438-021-01835-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomics ISSN: 1617-4623 Impact factor: 3.291
Primer sequences for RT-qPCR
| Genes | Primer sequences |
|---|---|
| F: AAAGGAGCATCAAAGCAACCA | |
| R: TCGGAAGATCACTATCATCTGGAT | |
| F: CGTCTACCACGCAGAAGAAATC | |
| R: ACTCTCTGATCAAGCCGGCAC | |
| F: ACCAGCTCCATTCCAGGCTC | |
| R: CTCCGAGGATCTCCGTTCTG | |
F: AGATCTGCCTGAAGTACGGC R: GGGATGTCGTCCACCAGC | |
F: GTGCCCGACTTTGAGCAGAA R: CTGTGCAGGGACTGCTTACC | |
F: GAGGAATGGGGTCTGGCTTT R: CAGACCCAGCCTTTCCTGT | |
F: GCGCGGAGAGGACAGTGA R: CCTCTTCTCCCAGAAAGCCCT | |
F: CCAGGTTCGCTAGATCCCAA R: ACTAGTGACGCCTAGGGGAG | |
F: TTCTTCCCCAACCATCCTGTC R: CCAACCTTCAACCAGGTGCT | |
| F: CCACAGTCTGCAGTCCACA | |
| R: CAGGTAGCGAGCCTTCTCAG | |
| F: ATGGTTCGGTGCATGAAGGA | |
| R: ATCCTCTGTGATGGTCTCGC | |
| F: GCAGAGAGAGCTGAGCAACA | |
| R: TCCTCTCCCATGTGGTCGAT | |
| F: AGGACTTTGTGGAAGGGCTG | |
| R: TCTTGCCCAGCCATCAACTT | |
| F: ACGAGCGTCATTCAGGAGC | |
| R: AGCACACTCGATGTCAGTCC | |
| F: GACTACTGCGTCTGCACCTT | |
| R: AGCAACTCTTCAGACCTCGC | |
| F: TTGCTTGCTGAAAACGGTCG | |
| R: GAGATGCAGTGGTGACGGAA | |
| F: TGGTTAAACTTGAATGCGGAGTG | |
| R: GGCTCATGCCTTAACAGGCT | |
| F: ACTGTGAGTAGTGCTCCCCT | |
| R: GAGCGAGGCTGTCTAGGTTC | |
| F: AAGGGCTTGAACGAGGAGTAGA | |
| R: TTATTCTGCTTCCTCCAAAGGG | |
| F: GGACTTCGAGCAGGAGATGG | |
| R: AGGAAGGAGGGCTGGAAGAG |
Fig. 1Identification of circular RNAs in LD and Sol skeletal muscles. A Pipeline for circRNA identification. B Venn diagram showing the overlap of annotated circRNAs among LD and Sol skeletal muscles. C Origin of circRNAs described in this study in the Sus scrofa genome
Summary of reads mapping to the reference genome and identification of circular RNAs
| Samples | LD | Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Raw reads | 99,987,084 | 82,541,576 |
| Clean reads | 86,645,908 | 72,841,678 |
| Mapped reads | 73,928,442 (85.52%) | 63,016,935 (86.77%) |
| Mapped reads (unfusion) | 62,626,818 (72.45%) | 53,855,038 (74.15%) |
| Candidate back-spliced junction reads | 1,000,194 (1.154%) | 880,632 (1.209%) |
| Realign post reads | 424,828 (0.490%) | 328,353 (0.451%) |
| Circular RNA number | 26,015 | 25,130 |
| Circular RNA number (reads > 1) | 20,351 | 19,483 |
Results from the assembly of circRNAs
| Item | circRNA | Min. length | Mean length | Median length | Max. length | Total length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 40,757 | 34 | 2734 | 439 | 99,934 | 111,433,971 |
Fig. 2General characteristics of circular RNAs in pigs. A Length distribution of circRNAs. B Circos plot showing the distribution of circRNAs on different chromosomes. C, D Length of circRNAs flanking introns. E circRNAs that contained varying numbers of exons. F Distribution of the number of circRNAs per gene
Fig. 3Differential circular RNA expression between LD and Sol skeletal muscles. A Cluster heat-map of differentially expressed circRNAs from each sample. B Volcano plots showing –log10 (pval) versus log2 fold difference in circRNAs abundance in RPM between LD and Sol skeletal muscles. Red dots denote significantly differently expressed circRNAs
Fig. 4Co-expression network of the miRNAs and candidate circRNAs. Red squares represent miRNAs. Green arrows represent circRNAs
Fig. 5Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of target genes of candidate circRNAs
Fig. 6RT-qPCR validation of nine differentially expressed circular RNAs between LD and Sol. Black indicates the tissue of LD, and white indicates the Sol. The data presented in the Y axis represent the relative expression of both RPM and RT-qPCR and are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. N = 3
Fig. 7circMYLK4 promotes the formation of slow muscle fibers. A Relative expression levels of circMYLK4 in AAV and control groups. B Skeletal muscle color test results after overexpression of circMYLK4. C The mRNA expression levels of MyHC I in different skeletal muscle tissues after overexpression of circMYLK4. D The protein expression and gradation analysis results of MyHC I in different skeletal muscle tissues after overexpression of circMYLK4. E–H The mRNA expression of slow fiber-related genes and mitochondria-related genes in different skeletal muscle tissues after overexpression of circMYLK4
Fig. 8Schematic diagram of circMYLK4 affecting muscle fiber types