Alexander J Mortensen1, Allan K Metz1, Devin L Froerer2, Stephen K Aoki3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. 2. University of Utah, School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. stephen.aoki@hsc.utah.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To characterize current concepts in capsular repair and hip instability, and examine findings from biomechanical and clinical studies on hip capsular management strategies as they pertain to hip stability, patient outcomes, and hip arthroscopy failure. Further, we discuss the clinical evaluation and treatment of capsular deficiency. RECENT FINDINGS: There remains debate regarding the optimal capsular management strategies in hip arthroscopy, particularly concerning the necessity of routine capsular repair. A variety of capsulotomy techniques exist and may be used to access the hip joint. Additionally, a wide variety of techniques are employed to repair the hip capsule. Biomechanical evidence supports capsular closure restores hip joint stability to that of the intact, native state. Several clinical studies in both primary and revision hip arthroscopy settings have demonstrated improved pain and functional outcomes in patients who underwent capsular repair or capsular reconstruction. Studies have shown capsular repair may be especially important in patients with ligamentous laxity and hip dysplasia, and in competitive athletes. Post-surgical hip instability secondary to capsular insufficiency is increasingly recognized as a cause of hip arthroscopy failure. Capsular closure restores native biomechanical stability to the hip joint, and several clinical studies report improved pain and functional outcomes following capsular repair or capsular reconstruction in both the primary and revision hip arthroscopy settings. There remains much to learn regarding capsular hip instability as it relates to optimal capsular management surgical technique, intra-operative capsular management decision-making, clinical diagnosis, and related advanced imaging findings.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To characterize current concepts in capsular repair and hip instability, and examine findings from biomechanical and clinical studies on hip capsular management strategies as they pertain to hip stability, patient outcomes, and hip arthroscopy failure. Further, we discuss the clinical evaluation and treatment of capsular deficiency. RECENT FINDINGS: There remains debate regarding the optimal capsular management strategies in hip arthroscopy, particularly concerning the necessity of routine capsular repair. A variety of capsulotomy techniques exist and may be used to access the hip joint. Additionally, a wide variety of techniques are employed to repair the hip capsule. Biomechanical evidence supports capsular closure restores hip joint stability to that of the intact, native state. Several clinical studies in both primary and revision hip arthroscopy settings have demonstrated improved pain and functional outcomes in patients who underwent capsular repair or capsular reconstruction. Studies have shown capsular repair may be especially important in patients with ligamentous laxity and hip dysplasia, and in competitive athletes. Post-surgical hip instability secondary to capsular insufficiency is increasingly recognized as a cause of hip arthroscopy failure. Capsular closure restores native biomechanical stability to the hip joint, and several clinical studies report improved pain and functional outcomes following capsular repair or capsular reconstruction in both the primary and revision hip arthroscopy settings. There remains much to learn regarding capsular hip instability as it relates to optimal capsular management surgical technique, intra-operative capsular management decision-making, clinical diagnosis, and related advanced imaging findings.
Keywords:
Hip arthroscopy; Hip arthroscopy revision; Hip capsular deficiency; Hip capsular insufficiency; Hip capsular laxity; Hip capsule; Hip instability; Hip microinstability
Authors: Timothy J Jackson; Alexander B Peterson; Masaki Akeda; Allyson Estess; Michelle H McGarry; Gregory J Adamson; Thay Q Lee Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Shuyang Han; Jerry W Alexander; Vijai S Thomas; Joshua Choi; Joshua D Harris; David B Doherty; Jonathan R T Jeffers; Philip C Noble Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Frank McCormick; William Slikker; Joshua D Harris; Anil K Gupta; Geoffrey D Abrams; Jonathan Frank; Bernard R Bach; Shane J Nho Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-07-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Marc J Philippon; Christiano A C Trindade; Mary T Goldsmith; Matthew T Rasmussen; Adriana J Saroki; Sverre Løken; Robert F LaPrade Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Seper Ekhtiari; Darren de Sa; Chloe E Haldane; Nicole Simunovic; Christopher M Larson; Marc R Safran; Olufemi R Ayeni Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Adam M Johannsen; Anthony W Behn; Kotaro Shibata; Leandro Ejnisman; Timothy Thio; Marc R Safran Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Joseph Featherall; Dillon C O'Neill; Alexander J Mortensen; Kelly M Tomasevich; Allan K Metz; Stephen K Aoki Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-11-28