Literature DB >> 34786607

Understanding the Accuracy of Clinician Provided Estimated Discharge Dates.

Olivia P Henry1, Gen Li2, Robert E Freundlich2,3, Warren S Sandberg2,3,4, Jonathan P Wanderer5,6.   

Abstract

Discharge planning is a vital tool in managing hospital capacity, which is essential for maintaining hospital throughput for surgical postoperative admissions. Early discharge planning has been effective in reducing length of stay and hospital readmissions. Between 2014 and 2017, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) implemented a tool in the electronic health record (EHR) requiring providers to input the patient's estimated discharge date on each hospital day. We hypothesized discharge estimates would be more accurate, on average, for surgical patients compared to non-surgical patients because treatment plans are known in advance of surgical admissions. We also analyzed the data to identify factors associated with more accurate discharge estimates. In this retrospective observational study, via an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) approach, we identified factors associated with more accurate discharge estimates for admitted adult patients at VUMC. The primary outcome was the difference between estimated and actual discharge date, and the primary exposure of interest was whether the patient underwent surgery while admitted to the hospital. A total of 304,802 date of discharge estimate entries from 68,587 inpatient encounters met inclusion criteria. After controlling for measured confounding, we found the discharge estimates were more precise as the difference between estimated and actual discharge date narrowed; for each additional day closer to discharge, prediction accuracy improved by .67 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.67; p < 0.001), on average. No difference was observed on the primary outcome in patients undergoing surgery compared with non-surgical treatment (0.02 days; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.03; p = 0.111). Faculty members were found to perform best among all clinicians in predicting estimated discharge date with a 0.24-day better accuracy (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.27; p < 0.001), on average, than other staff. Weekend and holiday, specific clinical teams, staff types, and discharge dispositions were associated with the variability in estimated versus actual discharge date (p < 0.001). Given the widespread variation in current efforts to improve discharge planning and the recommended approach of assigning a discharge date early in the hospital stay, understanding provider estimated discharge dates is an important tool in hospital capacity management. While we did not determine a difference in discharge estimates among surgical and non-surgical patients, we found estimates were more accurate as discharge came nearer and identified notable trends in provider inputs and patient factors. Assessing factors that impact variability in discharge accuracy can allow hospitals to design targeted interventions to improve discharge planning and reduce unnecessary hospital days.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discharge planning; Electronic medical records; Estimated date of discharge; Length of stay; Managing hospital capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34786607      PMCID: PMC8696264          DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01793-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.920


  13 in total

1.  Making effective use of predicted discharge dates to reduce the length of stay in hospital.

Authors:  Melanie Webber-Maybank; Helen Luton
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  2009-04-21

2.  Association Between Weekend Discharge and Hospital Readmission Rates Following Major Surgery.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Joy Chen; Yifei Ma; Kim F Rhoads
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Effectiveness of nurse-led early discharge planning programmes for hospital inpatients with chronic disease or rehabilitation needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qin-Mei Zhu; Jia Liu; Hong-Yi Hu; Su Wang
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nursing discharge planning interventions for older inpatients discharged home.

Authors:  Cédric Mabire; Andrew Dwyer; Antoine Garnier; Joanie Pellet
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Discharge planning: an exploratory study of the process of discharge planning on geriatric wards.

Authors:  K R Waters
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 6.  Effectiveness of early discharge planning in acutely ill or injured hospitalized older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary T Fox; Malini Persaud; Ilo Maimets; Dina Brooks; Kelly O'Brien; Deborah Tregunno
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 7.  A Review of Discharge-Prediction Processes in Acute Care Hospitals.

Authors:  Anna De Grood; Kenneth Blades; Sachin R Pendharkar
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-11

8.  Case Management Reduces Length of Stay, Charges, and Testing in Emergency Department Frequent Users.

Authors:  Casey A Grover; Jameel Sughair; Sydney Stoopes; Felipe Guillen; Leah Tellez; Tierra M Wilson; Charles Gaccione; Reb J H Close
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-02-12

9.  Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lauren Cadel; Sara J T Guilcher; Kristina Marie Kokorelias; Jason Sutherland; Jon Glasby; Tara Kiran; Kerry Kuluski
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Threats to validity in retrospective studies.

Authors:  Cindy Tofthagen
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2012-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.