Literature DB >> 34786603

Optimal surgery for esophagogastric junctional cancer.

Tsutomu Hayashi1, Takaki Yoshikawa2.   

Abstract

Esophagogastric junctional cancer is classified into three categories according to the Siewert classification, which reflects the epidemiological and biological characteristics. Therapeutic strategies have been evaluated according to the three Siewert types. There is a consensus that types I and III should be treated as esophageal cancer and gastric cancer, respectively. On the other hand, type II is often described as true cardiac cancer, which has different clinicopathological features from the other types. Thus, there is no consensus on the surgical management of type II esophagogastric junctional cancer. The optimal surgical management should focus on the principles of cancer surgery, which take into consideration oncological curability, including an appropriate resection margin, adequate lymphadenectomy, and minimization of postoperative complications. In this review, we evaluate the current relevant literature and evidence, on the surgical treatment of esophagogastric junctional cancer, focusing on type II. Esophagectomy with a thoracic approach has the advantage of ensuring a sufficient proximal resection margin and adequate mediastinal lymphadenectomy. However, the oncological benefit is offset by a high incidence of postoperative complications. Minimally invasive esophagectomy could be a possible solution to reduce complications and improve long-term outcomes. Further development of surgical treatments for Siewert type II is required to improve the outcomes. Furthermore, the surgical team should have expertise in both gastric cancer and esophageal cancer treatment, or patients should be managed with close collaboration between thoracic surgeons and gastric cancer surgeons.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagogastric junctional cancer; Siewert classification; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34786603     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02375-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   2.895


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer.

Authors:  Fanyu Meng; Yin Li; Haibo Ma; Ming Yan; Ruixiang Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Authors:  L Haverkamp; M F J Seesing; J P Ruurda; J Boone; R V Hillegersberg
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.429

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.