Alejandra Calvo-Schimmel1, Suparna Qanungo2, Susan D Newman2, Katherine R Sterba3. 1. College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 2. Department of Nursing Operating, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Supportive care interventions can improve quality of life and health outcomes of advanced prostate cancer survivors. Despite the high prevalence of unmet needs, supportive care for this population is sparse. METHODS: The databases PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles. Data were extracted, organized by thematic matrix, and categorized according to the seven domains of the Supportive Care Framework for Cancer Care. RESULTS: The search yielded 1678 articles, of which 18 were included in the review and critically appraised. Most studies were cross-sectional with small, non-diverse samples. Supportive care interventions reported for advanced prostate cancer survivors are limited with some positive trends. Most outcomes were symptom-focused and patient self-reported (e.g., anxiety, pain, self-efficacy) evaluated by questionnaires or interview. Interventions delivered in group format reported improvements in more outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Additional supportive care intervention are needed for men with advanced prostate cancer. Because of their crucial position in caring for cancer patients, nurse scientists and clinicians must partner to research and develop patient-centered, culturally relevant supportive care interventions that improve this population's quality of life and health outcomes. Efforts must concentrate on sampling, domains of needs, theoretical framework, guidelines, and measurement instruments.
BACKGROUND: Supportive care interventions can improve quality of life and health outcomes of advanced prostate cancer survivors. Despite the high prevalence of unmet needs, supportive care for this population is sparse. METHODS: The databases PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles. Data were extracted, organized by thematic matrix, and categorized according to the seven domains of the Supportive Care Framework for Cancer Care. RESULTS: The search yielded 1678 articles, of which 18 were included in the review and critically appraised. Most studies were cross-sectional with small, non-diverse samples. Supportive care interventions reported for advanced prostate cancer survivors are limited with some positive trends. Most outcomes were symptom-focused and patient self-reported (e.g., anxiety, pain, self-efficacy) evaluated by questionnaires or interview. Interventions delivered in group format reported improvements in more outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Additional supportive care intervention are needed for men with advanced prostate cancer. Because of their crucial position in caring for cancer patients, nurse scientists and clinicians must partner to research and develop patient-centered, culturally relevant supportive care interventions that improve this population's quality of life and health outcomes. Efforts must concentrate on sampling, domains of needs, theoretical framework, guidelines, and measurement instruments.
Authors: Crystal S Denlinger; Robert W Carlson; Madhuri Are; K Scott Baker; Elizabeth Davis; Stephen B Edge; Debra L Friedman; Mindy Goldman; Lee Jones; Allison King; Elizabeth Kvale; Terry S Langbaum; Jennifer A Ligibel; Mary S McCabe; Kevin T McVary; Michelle Melisko; Jose G Montoya; Kathi Mooney; Mary Ann Morgan; Tracey O'Connor; Electra D Paskett; Muhammad Raza; Karen L Syrjala; Susan G Urba; Mark T Wakabayashi; Phyllis Zee; Nicole McMillian; Deborah Freedman-Cass Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Xiomara Skrabal Ross; Kate M Gunn; Ian Olver; Roy A Willems; Lilian Lechner; Ilse Mesters; Catherine A W Bolman Journal: Curr Opin Support Palliat Care Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 2.302
Authors: Dennis R Taaffe; Robert U Newton; Nigel Spry; David Joseph; Suzanne K Chambers; Robert A Gardiner; Brad A Wall; Prue Cormie; Kate A Bolam; Daniel A Galvão Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Suzanne Kathleen Chambers; Elizabeth Foley; Elizabeth Galt; Megan Ferguson; Samantha Clutton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Daniel Santa Mina; Michael K Connor; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Paul Toren; Crissa Guglietti; Andrew G Matthew; John Trachtenberg; Paul Ritvo Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Fiona Crawford-Williams; Sonja March; Belinda C Goodwin; Nicholas Ralph; Daniel A Galvão; Robert U Newton; Suzanne K Chambers; Jeff Dunn Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: J Cockle-Hearne; F Charnay-Sonnek; L Denis; H E Fairbanks; D Kelly; S Kav; K Leonard; E van Muilekom; P Fernandez-Ortega; B T Jensen; S Faithfull Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 7.640