Literature DB >> 34783961

Spin in the Scientific Literature on Bariatric Endoscopy: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Sayeh Shirvani1, Claire Rives-Lange1,2, Nathalie Rassy3, Arthur Berger4, Claire Carette2,5, Tigran Poghosyan6, Sébastien Czernichow7,8.   

Abstract

Bariatric endoscopy (BE) is an emerging treatment option for people with obesity. Spin (i.e., the practice of frequent misrepresentation or overinterpretation of study findings) may lead to imbalanced and unjustified optimism in the interpretation of the results. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the frequency and type of spin in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of endoscopic primary weight loss techniques with statistically significant and nonsignificant primary outcomes. In conclusion, spin is observed in the abstract and main text of BE reports and can lead to misinterpretation or overinterpretation of the results. Since BE challenges the available non-endoscopic treatments for obesity, further research is needed to better qualify these techniques, as being effective and safe, as well as predefined hypotheses and analyses.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric endoscopy; Obesity; Randomized controlled trial; Spin

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34783961     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05790-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  2 in total

1.  "Spin" in scientific writing: scientific mischief and legal jeopardy.

Authors:  Robert H Fletcher; Bert Black
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  2007-09

Review 2.  Randomized controlled trials - a matter of design.

Authors:  Peter Markus Spieth; Anne Sophie Kubasch; Ana Isabel Penzlin; Ben Min-Woo Illigens; Kristian Barlinn; Timo Siepmann
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.570

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.