Literature DB >> 34782844

Risk Factors of Intractable Epilepsy in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Yehia Hamed Abdel Maksoud1, Hany Abdelaziz Suliman1, Sameh ElSAYED Abdulsamea1, Naglaa Mohamed Kamal2, Ashraf Hamed Al-Shokray1, Asmaa Obada Ibrahim3, Hatem Hamed Elshorbagy4, Mohamed Gamal El Din Fathallah2, Ahmed Mahmoud Attia5, Akram Elshafey Elsadek1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the risk factors predicting the development of intractable epilepsy in children with cerebral palsy (CP), with an emphasis on perinatal characteristics, seizure semiology, imaging, and EEG findings. MATERIALS &
METHODS: Following a descriptive, retrospective, case-control design, 106 children with CP and epilepsy from 2015 to 2020 were studied (46 children with CP and intractable epilepsy and 60 with CP and controlled epilepsy). Data were retrieved from medical records of participants (i.e., demographics, clinical characteristics, perinatal history, etiology of seizure and CP, seizure semiology, intellectual functions, therapeutic options, brain imaging, and EEG findings).
RESULTS: We established a model of the most important risk factors that can predict intractable epilepsy in children with CP. The model included the additive effect of a poor Apgar score at 5 minutes, the presence of neonatal seizures, focal epilepsy, and focal slowing on the EEG background (Area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.810).
CONCLUSION: The findings can be used to identify intractable epilepsy in children who suffer from CP with further support by offering early therapeutic interventions intended to reduce the burden of refractory seizures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral palsy; Children; Intractable epilepsy; Risk factors

Year:  2021        PMID: 34782844      PMCID: PMC8570632          DOI: 10.22037/ijcn.v15i3.31556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol        ISSN: 1735-4668


Introduction

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of permanent, non-progressive disorders that affect muscle tone as well as movement or posture. It is caused by damages to the developing brain either before or during birth (1). Motor disorders of CP are often accompanied by epilepsy, disturbances of sensation, perception, communication, cognition, and behavior, as well as secondary musculoskeletal problems (2). It is well proved that epilepsy had a higher association with cerebral palsy; 15–60% of children with CP have been reported to be epileptics. The type of epilepsy among children with CP varies according to the type of CP (3). Previous studies not only had demonstrated the clinical characteristics and epidemiology of epilepsy in children with different types of CP (4, 5, 6), but also described its features, course, and outcomes, as well as consequences of refractory seizures (6). In some instances, refractory seizures are more problematic than the musculoskeletal complications of CP. The risk factors for the development of epilepsy later in life were commonly related to earlier onset of seizure and history of neonatal seizures (7). However, data related to birth conditions contribute to a lesser extent to the development of epilepsy in these patients (8). We aimed to explore the predictive factors that increase the risk of development of drug-resistant epilepsy in children with CP

Materials & Methods

This descriptive, retrospective, case-control study was conducted on 106 children with CP and epilepsy (58 boys and 48 girls). The youngest and oldest participants were 3 months and 14 years old, respectively. Participants were selected among those referred to the pediatric neurology outpatient clinic of Al Hada, Taif military hospitals, Saudi Arabia, and Benha university hospital, Benha, Egypt, from 2015 to 2020. The study is approved by the institutional review board of the faculty of medicine of Taif University. The exclusion criteria were: (1) Children with CP who did not develop seizures; (2) Having neurodegenerative brain disease; (3) Inborn errors of metabolism; (4) Children with CP who had a history of isolated febrile seizures; (5) Children with CP who had a history of isolated neonatal seizures with no seizures beyond the neonatal period. (5) History of acute symptomatic seizures, defined as seizures at the time or proximity to a systemic or neurologic insult. CP was defined as non-progressive encephalopathy that manifests as motor and postural disabilities. Epilepsy was defined as at least two unprovoked seizures with more than 24hr apart in the absence of acute insult. Following the International Classification of Epilepsies and Seizure disorders, epilepsies were classified for all participants (9). A pediatric neurologist examined all children in order to approve their EEG. Brain imaging examinations were evaluated by a pediatric neurologist and neuroradiologist. Data on age, gender, age of onset of seizures, prenatal and perinatal history including gestational age, weight at birth, head circumference, Apgar scores at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, need for active resuscitation at the time of birth, and the history suggestive of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, presence of neonatal seizures, history of epileptics, which was defined as a continuous seizure activity more than 30 minutes or recurrent attacks of seizures without regaining the conscious level in between (10), family history of epilepsy, history of delayed developmental milestones, EEG and brain imaging (brain CT/MRI), type, dose, and duration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), the response of seizure, refractory seizure, and any alternative management of seizures including ketogenic diet; vagal nerve stimulation; and epilepsy surgery, were retrieved from medical records of participants. Controlled epilepsy was defined as experiencing no seizure for more than 12 months, while drug-resistant epilepsy was defined as persistent seizures despite the proper use of at least two AEDs (proper selection- -optimum serum drug level, and good compliance)(11). Also, data related to CP included the type of CP, underlying cause, and growth motor function classification system (GMFCS) score. Assessment of intelligent quotient (IQ) was done using neuropsychological tests. Mental retardation was defined as IQ < 70. Children with IQ < 35 were defined as severe mental retardation, 49–35 was considered as moderate mental retardation, and 69–50 was defined as mild mental retardation (12).

Results

A total of 250 children with CP were recruited in the present study, of whom 130 were also suffering from epilepsy. Fourteen children were excluded from our study (2 had a neurodegenerative brain disease, one was suffering from an inborn error of metabolism, 3 had acute symptomatic seizures, 4 had isolated febrile seizures, and 4 had isolated neonatal seizures. As a result, data of 106 children with CP and epilepsy were analyzed. Prematurity was found in 23% of participants. The most common type of CP was spastic quadriplegia (31.1%), followed by spastic hemiplegia (28.3%) and spastic diplegia (16.9%). However, spastic triplegia and extrapyramidal were reported in 11.3% and 7.5% of participants, respectively. Only 4.7% showed ataxic CP. The most common cause of CP was prematurity (23%), followed by intracranial hemorrhage (20.7%) and cerebral infarction (15%). However, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and central nervous system (CNS) infections were found in 13.3% and 11.3% of participants, respectively. About 10% of patients showed cerebral malformations, while 7.5% showed trauma as underlying etiology (Table 1). Generalized seizures, focal seizure, and focal onset seizure with secondary generalization were found in 41 (38.6.3%), 29 (27.3%), and 36 (33.9%) of participants, respectively. The age of onset of seizure was 6-40 months with a median of 19 months. The majority of cases were reported in the 1st year of life; (56.6% or n=60) cases. However, 2.8% (n=3) cases were diagnosed after the age of 10 years. Ninety-four cases (88.6 %) showed abnormalities in their EEG records. We found EEG abnormalities in the form of generalized (43 cases (40.5%)), focal (34 cases (32%)), and multifocal (12 cases (11.3%)) epileptogenic activities.
Table (1)

Risk Factors for Intractable Epilepsy in Children with CP

Risk factor Epilepsy Total P-value
Intractable (n =46) Controlled (n =60)
Sex MaleFemale28 (61)18 (39)33(55)27(45)61 (57.5)45(42.5)0.65
Perinatal history Gestational age, wk.<30 weeks30-37 weeks> 37Birth weight, g(mean ± SD)500-1000 g 1000-1500 g 1500 -2000 g >2000 gApgar scores at minute 10-45-78-10Apgar scores at minute 50-45-78-1032.6 ± 4.913(28)12(26)21 (45.6)2346 ± 95012(26)7(15)5(11)22(48)20(43.5)12(26)14(30.5)18(39)8(18)20(43)33.2 ± 6.822(36.6)16(26.6)22(36.6)1938 ± 10757(11.6)11(18.4)12(20)30(50)10(16.7)18(30)32(53.3)7(11.6)10(16.7)43(72)32.9 ± 5.435(33)28(26.5)43(40.5)2250 ± 139519(17.9)18(16.9)17 (16)52(49)30(28.3)30(28.3)46(43.4)25(23.5)18(16.9)63(59.4)0.420.370.410.360.280.640.540.270.450.030.180.340.00090.120;03
Active resuscitation at birthHIEInterventricular haemorrhagePeriventricular leukomalaciaMicrocephaly22(48)11(24)14(30)9(20)12(26)11(18.4)8(13.4)19(31.6)12(20)10(16.6)33(31.1)19(17.9)33(31.1)21(19.8)22(20.7)0.020.140.730.280.57
Cerebral palsy TypeSpastic quadriplegiaSpastic hemiplegiaSpastic diplegia Spastic triplegia Extrapyramidal CPAtaxic CP18(39.1)13(28.2)6(13.1)4(8.7)3(6.6)2(4.3)15(25)17(28)12(20)8(13)5(8)3(5)33(31.1)30(28.3)18(16.9)12(11.3)8(7.5)5(4.7)0.09
GMFCS 12345CausePrematurityIntracranial haemorrhage(ICH) Cerebral infarctionHIECNS infectionBrain anomaliesTraumatic brain injury10(22)8(17)6(13)10(22)12(26)7(15.2)10(22)9(19.5)8(17.3)6(13)4(8.7)2(4.3)13(22)15(25)10(17)11(18)11(18)17(28)12(20)7(12)6(10)6(10)6(10)6(10)23(21.6)23(21.6)16(15)13(19.8)23(21.6)24(23)22(20.7)16(15)14(13.3)12(11.3)10(9.4)8(7.5)0.360.19
Epilepsy Age at the onset of seizure; months (median (IQR))History of neonatal seizuresPositive family history of epilepsyStatus epilepticus as initial presentationType of seizure-Focal-Generalized-Focal with secondary generalization14(2-42.5)18(39.1)4(8.7)11(24)22(48)14(30)10(22)27(8-51.5)7(12)5(8)7(11.6)7(12)27(45)26(43)19(6-40)25(23.5)9(8.4)18(17)29(27.3)41(38.6)36 (33.9)0.020030.150.040.0005
Initial EEG record EEG background activity Focal slowingGeneralized slowingEEG activity and patternGeneralized epileptogenic activityFocal epileptogenic activityMultifocal epileptogenic activityHypsarrhythmia14(30)18(39.1)11(24)23(50)10(22)3(6.6)7(12)22(36.6)32(53.3)11(18)2(3.3)2(3.3)21(19.8)40 (37.7)43 (40.5)34 (32)12(11.3)5 (4.7)0.020.04
Intellectual impairmentSpecial education needs36(78.2)39(84.7)26(43.3)30(50)0.040.02
Number of current medications(mean ± SD)Number of failed therapeutic trials (mean ± SD)Ketogenic diet Vagus nerve stimulationReferral for epilepsy surgery3.2 ± 0.832.82±1.58(18)3(6.6)2(4.3)1.6 ± 0.780.15 ± 0.430(0)0(0)0(0)2.8±0.781.86±0.928(7.5)3(2.8)2(1.8)0.430.020.0010.030.04
A specific EEG pattern was found in 4.7% (n=5) cases in the form of Hypsarrhythmia. However, abnormalities in EEG background included generalized slowing and focal slow rhythms in 37.7% (n=40) and 19.8% (n=21) participants, respectively. In addition, in the present study, intractable epilepsy was found in 43.3% (n=46) cases. The most common etiological factor responsible for focal-onset intractable epilepsy was intracranial Hemorrhage (22%), followed by cerebral infarction (19.5%) and CNS infection (13%). Nevertheless, brain malformation and trauma accounted for 8.7% and 4.3% of cases, respectively. The causes of CP leading to focal slowing on the EEG background in children with CP and intractable epilepsy were more or less similar, which included cerebral infarction (11%), intracranial bleeding (9%), CNS infection (4%), and, to a lesser extent, brain malformation (3%), and brain trauma (3%). Furthermore, we evaluated other variables that are reported as a probable consequence rather than a cause of intractable epilepsy. The following factors presented a significant association with intractable epilepsy: intellectual impairment (P =0.04), need for special education (P =0.02), a larger number of failed therapeutic trials (P =0.02), need for a ketogenic diet (P=0.001), history of undergone vagal nerve stimulation (P=0.03), and referral to epilepsy surgery (P=0.04). However, there was no significant association between the number of current AEDs and intractable epilepsy (P=0.43) (Table 1). Comparison of intractable epilepsy and controlled epilepsy in terms of association with independent risk factors Intractable epilepsy in children with CP was significantly associated with a low Apgar score (0-4) at 1 (P=0.03) and at 5 (P<0.0009) minutes as well as the need for active resuscitation at birth (P=0.02), Also, significant risk factors included younger age at the onset of the seizure (P=0.02), history of neonatal seizure (P=.003), history of status epilepticus as the initial presentation (P=0.04), focal-onset epilepsy (P < .001), and focal slowing on EEG record (Table 1). However, according to the findings, gender, prematurity, gestational age, body weight at birth, HIE, type CP, GMFCS score, etiology of CP, presence of a gross brain malformation, periventricular leukomalacia, IVH, microcephaly, type of epileptiform discharge, and positive family history of epilepsy did not show any significant changes between intractable epilepsy and controlled epilepsy (Table 1). Multivariate analysis of Predictors of intractable epilepsy: A low Apgar score (1-4) at 5 minutes was associated with increased risk of intractable epilepsy (by 3.17 times) (95% CI 1.41 -8.34, P = 0.03), while neonatal seizure was associated with 3.36 times increase in the risk of developing the condition (95% CI 1.36 -10.26, P =0 .02). However, for the focal onset Epilepsy and focal slowing in EEG background, the increase was equivalent to 3.43 (95% CI 1.81 -7.37, P =0 .008) and 4.35 folds (95% CI 1.48-16.8, P =0 .004) (Table 2), respectively.
Table (2)

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Predicting Intractable Epilepsy in Children with CP

Clinical data OR (95% CI) P- value
Poor Apgar score at 5 minutes (1-4) 3.17(1.41 -8.34)0.03
History of neonatal seizures 3.36(1.36 -10.26)0 .02
Focal epilepsy 3.43(1.81 -7.37)0 .008
Focal slowing on EEG background 4.35(1.48-16.8)0 .004)
We estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each variable, with further analysis of different combinations of the most significant variables (Table 3). The additions of all variables resulted in an AUC of 0.785. However, the addition of the 4 variables (i.e. a poor Apgar score of 1-4 at 5 minutes, development of neonatal seizures, focal epilepsy, and focal slowing on EEG background) resulted in the best model for the prediction of intractable epilepsy in children with CP, by yielding an AUC of 0.810 (Table 3). The additive effect of the independent variables that were more common in the intractable epilepsy group was also evaluated (Table 4).
Table (3)

Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for different variables predicting intractable Epilepsy

Risk model AUC – 1
Gestational age 0.515
Birth weight 0.532
Poor Apgar score (1-4) at 1 min 0.785
Poor Apgar score (1-4) at 5 min * 0.625
Need of active resuscitation at birth 0.537
HIE 0.546
Microcephaly 0.573
Brain anomalies 0.572
Younger age of seizure onset* 0.628
Development of neonatal seizures 0.563
Status epilepticus as initial presentation 0.545
Focal epilepsy * 0.627
Focal slowing of EEG background* 0.644
Combination of all variables 0.785
Combination of all the variables* 0.810
Table (4)

Probabilities of Epilepsy Being intractable in Children with CP with Different Combinations of Predictive Variables

Poor Apgar score at 5 min Neonatal seizures Focal epilepsy Focal slowing of EEG background Number of risk factors present Probability
Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 0.87
No No No No 0 0.04
Yes No No No 1 0.13
No Yes No No 1 0.16
No No Yes No 1 0.17
No No No Yes 1 0.18
Yes Yes No No 2 0.28
No No Yes Yes 2 0.32
Yes No Yes No 2 0.36
Yes No No Yes 2 0.40
No Yes No Yes 2 0.43
No Yes Yes No 2 0.47
Yes Yes Yes No 3 0.58
Yes Yes No Yes 3 0.64
Yes No Yes Yes 3 0.66
No Yes Yes Yes 3 0.74
Risk Factors for Intractable Epilepsy in Children with CP Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Predicting Intractable Epilepsy in Children with CP Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for different variables predicting intractable Epilepsy Probabilities of Epilepsy Being intractable in Children with CP with Different Combinations of Predictive Variables

Discussion

In this retrospective study, we studied epileptic children with CP according to demographic data, clinical characteristics, perinatal history, neuroimaging features, and etiological factors to investigate the risk factors that can predict the development of intractable epilepsy. Refractory seizure not only causes significant morbidity and mortality but also has a high psychosocial burden with many implications in children with CP (13). The present study aimed to investigate factors that can predict intractable epilepsy in children with CP. According to the findings, poor Apgar score at 5 minutes, neonatal seizures, focal epilepsy, and focal slowing of EEG background were more significant than other factors. Based on the effect of these independent factors, we established a prediction model. The accuracy of the model was validated by AUC, which expressed good discriminatory power. Further analysis showed that the probability of intractable epilepsy is high in cases that have all these variables together. However, the combinations of some of these variables did not necessarily yield a high probability of intractable epilepsy. In our study, the incidence of epilepsy and intractable seizures in children with CP were comparable to those reported by other authors (14, 15, 16, 17, 18). In the present study, we defined intractable epilepsy according to the ILAE commission consensus proposal: “failure of a therapeutic trial of two maximally tolerated, appropriately chosen and properly used AEDs”, contrary to other studies that used a time frame of seizure-free period or did not consider a time reference at all (11). A unique finding of the present study is the positive correlation between a poor Apgar score and intractable epilepsy in children with CP. It is known that prenatal and perinatal problems are the major causes of CP in children. However, sufficient evidence is not available about the effect of these factors on the development of intractable epilepsy. Hence, in the present study, we determined the detailed data of prenatal and postnatal problems. Few studies mentioned a positive association between birth conditions and prognosis of epilepsy in children with CP (19). However, a poor Apgar score is associated with an increased risk of developing epilepsy in the general population and for those who suffer from CP in particular (20, 21, 22). Previous studies mentioned the relation between gestational age or birth weight and the development of epilepsy in children with CP. However, the results are conflicting. The association between gestational age and birth weight with intractable epilepsy was lacking in our study; however, there are studies that support our findings (18, 19). According to the findings, prematurity and low birth weight were not related to the risk of developing epilepsy (18). Kulak et al. found an increased risk of epilepsy in patients with low birth weight, but they did not reveal any association between gestational age and the risk of epilepsy development (23). Zelnik et al. reported that epilepsy was more prevalent in full-term infants than in preterm; meanwhile, they found no association between birth weight and increased risk of epilepsy development (6). In 17 European registers, some authors reported an association between epilepsy development and term and having a weight of ≥ 2500 g (15). Also, it has been reported that term delivery had a significant association with epilepsy development (24). These findings can be attributed to the fact that epilepsy usually stems from gray matter lesions, which are more prevalent in full-term babies, while white matter lesions are more common in premature infants (25, 26). The increased risk of epilepsy in children with CP has been attributed to genetic and perinatal factors (4). Among the perinatal factors, brain anomalies, chromosomal defects, intrauterine infections, and neonatal HIE are the more obvious causes that may result in seizures. Brain imaging may provide a diagnostic clue to the timing and nature of the brain insult in these children (5). In our study, the type of CP or its etiology or the GMFCS score did not show a significant association with intractable epilepsy. Regarding the type of CP, some authors reported similar findings, while others found inconsistent results. The difference can be attributed to the applied methodologies (18, 19). The frequency of epilepsy varies according to the CP subtype. According to the literature, epilepsy is particularly more common in patients with quadriplegic CP, while it is less common in children with dyskinetic or ataxic CP (4, 6, 24). The etiology of CP was classified according to the findings of brain imaging. It was found that children with evidence of CNS infection or brain anomalies in their brain imaging had a poor prognosis regarding seizure control compared to those with white matter injury or idiopathic causes (27). Despite the positive association between epilepsy in general and having a higher GMFCS score, our results showed an insignificant association between GMFCS score and intractable epilepsy. Contrary to our findings, Mert et al. reported an insignificant impact of GMFCS score on epilepsy prognosis (18, 19, 28). This can be attributed to the fact that GMFCS is a score that reflects motor system affection caused by white matter injury. Previously, it was reported that a history of neonatal seizures in children with CP is a risk factor for later epilepsy development (15, 18, 23, 24). Going with the current evidence of epilepsy in children with CP, we found that younger age at onset of the seizure, especially neonatal-onset seizure, was associated with intractable epilepsy (29,30). Therefore, we concluded that neonatal seizure, especially during the first 72 h, was a major risk factor for the prediction of later development of intractable epilepsy. The Collaborative Perinatal Project (NCPP) of the NIH reported a strong association between neonatal seizures and epilepsy (31). Some studies provided evidence that neonatal seizures can predict the future development of epilepsy in children with CP (32, 33). The history of neonatal seizures in children with CP is a risk factor for epilepsy development. Subsequently, the outcome for seizure control was negatively affected by this history, and patients with a history of neonatal seizures are at increased risk of intractable epilepsy prognosis compared to those without such a history (18). In our study, most children with CP had generalized seizures, as reported in previous studies (17, 18, 23, 24, 34). This can be attributed to the high number of children who suffered from spastic quadriplegic CP with diffuse brain injury in our sample of patients. There are many controversies regarding our finding that focal seizures were associated with intractable epilepsy. While some studies report similar findings (35, 36), others found contradictory results(18). For instance, it has been reported that focal seizures are one of the most important predictive factors of the worst outcomes of overall epilepsy in children (36). The strong association between intractable epilepsy and focal seizure can be attributed to its association with focal structural brain lesions (37, 38). This association was highlighted in our study, which showed all causes of CP that lead to focal epilepsy could be caused by focal brain pathology. Also, we observed a significant association between SE and intractable epilepsy, which is supported by other studies that reported a higher incidence of SE in children with CP and considered SE as an independent risk factor for intractable epilepsy (14, 30). This association can be explained by the fact that SE leads to brain damage (39). We reported changes in the EEG records in our cohort of patients in the form of generalized background slowing and focal activity. These EEG changes have been corroborated by several studies (4, 16, 23, 34, 35). In our study, EEG changes that are predictive of intractable epilepsy were focal, multifocal discharges, and focal background slowing. These EEG changes are an indication of intractable epilepsy in epileptic children (43, 44). Indeed, evidence regarding the predictive value of EEG on intractable epilepsy in children with CP are not sufficient (19). Mert et.al. reported that the presence of definite epileptogenic activity in EEG is significantly associated with more severe outcomes. However, their study suffers the limitation of describing either the type of epileptogenic activity or background rhythm abnormalities (18). Also, the pattern of hypsarrhythmia in EEG is a poor prognostic factor (23). The focal slowing in the EEG background may indicate a focal destructive lesion within the white matter of the brain of whatever the etiology. The etiological factors include trauma, brain anomalies, vascular lesions, and CNS infections that may lead to the generation of epileptic focus and later to cerebral dysfunction. According to the findings, these etiologies have been reported mainly in children with CP and epilepsy with a focal slowing in the EEG background. Our results are in line with studies that described focal EEG changes in children with hemiplegic CP (43, 44). There is a link between EEG abnormalities and behavioral and cognitive impairment in children with CP (4). That is why we recommend EEG recording on a routine basis for follow-up of children with CP. Children with spastic quadriplegia and hemiplegia experience developmental delay and intellectual disability, which matches brain damage commonly found in these forms of CP. Furthermore, it was significantly associated with intractable epilepsy. Indeed, the association between CP, epilepsy, and cognitive impairment, has been declared to be significant (4, 15). Mert et al. mentioned mental retardation as a risk factor for epilepsy in children with CP (16,18). Other authors found no significant difference between CP and epilepsy in terms of the social quotient, despite the fact that seizures are more frequent and intractable in patients with mental retardation. It is difficult to determine that cognitive impairment is either a cause or a resultant effect of intractable epilepsy. Therefore, we did not include cognitive impairment as a risk factor in the prediction model of intractable epilepsy (45, 46).

Limitations

It is necessary to mention some limitations and biases of our study, including following a retrospective design, the heterogeneity of the etiological factors of CP, and epilepsy. These limitations probably have declined the accuracy of conclusions regarding the characteristics of intractable epilepsy. Further prospective studies on homogeneous groups, classified according to etiology and imaging findings, are recommended.

In Conclusion

According to the findings, we can conclude that the most important risk factors that can predict intractable epilepsy in children with CP include poor Apgar score at 5 minutes, presence of neonatal seizures, focal epilepsy, and focal slowing on the EEG background. Intractable epilepsy may cause major adverse medical and psychosocial consequences. Our results can help clinicians and neurologists for the identification of children with CP and those at high risk of epilepsy, with further support to offer early therapeutic interventions intended to reduce the burden of refractory seizures.
  39 in total

Review 1.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in elucidating the pathogenesis of cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ingeborg Krägeloh-Mann; Veronka Horber
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 2.  Population-based study of neuroimaging findings in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Kayle Towsley; Michael I Shevell; Lynn Dagenais
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.140

3.  Long-term prognosis in children with neonatal seizures: a population-based study.

Authors:  Gabriel M Ronen; David Buckley; Sharon Penney; David L Streiner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Clinical and aetiological aspects of epilepsy in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Malin Carlsson; Gudrun Hagberg; Ingrid Olsson
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.449

5.  Risk factors for epilepsy in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Nathanel Zelnik; Muriel Konopnicki; Odeya Bennett-Back; Tsofia Castel-Deutsch; Emmanuel Tirosh
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.140

Review 6.  An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Oskoui; Franzina Coutinho; Jonathan Dykeman; Nathalie Jetté; Tamara Pringsheim
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 7.  The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: incidence, impairments and risk factors.

Authors:  Else Odding; Marij E Roebroeck; Hendrik J Stam
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  Epilepsy in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  A K Gururaj; L Sztriha; A Bener; A Dawodu; V Eapen
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 9.  ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy.

Authors:  Robert S Fisher; Carlos Acevedo; Alexis Arzimanoglou; Alicia Bogacz; J Helen Cross; Christian E Elger; Jerome Engel; Lars Forsgren; Jacqueline A French; Mike Glynn; Dale C Hesdorffer; B I Lee; Gary W Mathern; Solomon L Moshé; Emilio Perucca; Ingrid E Scheffer; Torbjörn Tomson; Masako Watanabe; Samuel Wiebe
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Comorbidities in cerebral palsy and their relationship to neurologic subtype and GMFCS level.

Authors:  Michael I Shevell; Lynn Dagenais; Nicholas Hall
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.