Literature DB >> 34782439

Visual Motion and Decision-Making in Dyslexia: Reduced Accumulation of Sensory Evidence and Related Neural Dynamics.

Catherine Manning1,2, Cameron D Hassall3, Laurence T Hunt4, Anthony M Norcia5, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers6, Margaret J Snowling7, Gaia Scerif7, Nathan J Evans8.   

Abstract

Children with and without dyslexia differ in their behavioral responses to visual information, particularly when required to pool dynamic signals over space and time. Importantly, multiple processes contribute to behavioral responses. Here we investigated which processing stages are affected in children with dyslexia when performing visual motion processing tasks, by combining two methods that are sensitive to the dynamic processes leading to responses. We used a diffusion model which decomposes response time and accuracy into distinct cognitive constructs, and high-density EEG. Fifty children with dyslexia (24 male) and 50 typically developing children (28 male) 6-14 years of age judged the direction of motion as quickly and accurately as possible in two global motion tasks (motion coherence and direction integration), which varied in their requirements for noise exclusion. Following our preregistered analyses, we fitted hierarchical Bayesian diffusion models to the data, blinded to group membership. Unblinding revealed reduced evidence accumulation in children with dyslexia compared with typical children for both tasks. Additionally, we identified a response-locked EEG component which was maximal over centro-parietal electrodes which indicated a neural correlate of reduced drift rate in dyslexia in the motion coherence task, thereby linking brain and behavior. We suggest that children with dyslexia tend to be slower to extract sensory evidence from global motion displays, regardless of whether noise exclusion is required, thus furthering our understanding of atypical perceptual decision-making processes in dyslexia.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Reduced sensitivity to visual information has been reported in dyslexia, with a lively debate about whether these differences causally contribute to reading difficulties. In this large preregistered study with a blind modeling approach, we combine state-of-the art methods in both computational modeling and EEG analysis to pinpoint the stages of processing that are atypical in children with dyslexia in two visual motion tasks that vary in their requirement for noise exclusion. We find reduced evidence accumulation in children with dyslexia across both tasks, and identify a neural marker, allowing us to link brain and behavior. We show that children with dyslexia exhibit general difficulties with extracting sensory evidence from global motion displays, not just in tasks that require noise exclusion.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; decision-making; development; diffusion model; motion perception; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34782439      PMCID: PMC8741156          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1232-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  81 in total

1.  Deficits of motion transparency perception in adult developmental dyslexics with normal unidirectional motion sensitivity.

Authors:  Gary T Hill; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Beyond the global motion deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia: A cross-sectional study of visual, cognitive, and socio-economic factors influencing reading ability in children.

Authors:  Barbara Piotrowska; Alexandra Willis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A few remarks on the utility of visual motion perception to assess the integrity of the magnocellular system or the dorsal stream.

Authors:  Bernt C Skottun
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Action video games make dyslexic children read better.

Authors:  Sandro Franceschini; Simone Gori; Milena Ruffino; Simona Viola; Massimo Molteni; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis; David J Francis; Paul T Cirino; Russell Schachar; Marcia A Barnes; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  M S Livingstone; G D Rosen; F W Drislane; A M Galaburda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A neural index of inefficient evidence accumulation in dyslexia underlying slow perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Nicole R Stefanac; Shou-Han Zhou; Megan M Spencer-Smith; Redmond O'Connell; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data.

Authors:  Udo Boehm; Maarten Marsman; Dora Matzke; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-08

9.  Theoretically meaningful models can answer clinically relevant questions.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Neural dynamics underlying coherent motion perception in children and adults.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Blair Kaneshiro; Peter J Kohler; Mihaela Duta; Gaia Scerif; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  4 in total

1.  Probabilistic Decision-Making in Children With Dyslexia.

Authors:  Christa L Watson Pereira; Ran Zhou; Mark A Pitt; Jay I Myung; P Justin Rossi; Eduardo Caverzasi; Esther Rah; Isabel E Allen; Maria Luisa Mandelli; Marita Meyer; Zachary A Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno Tempini
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Integration of visual motion and orientation signals in dyslexic children: an equivalent noise approach.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Victoria Hulks; Marc S Tibber; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Behavioural and neural indices of perceptual decision-making in autistic children during visual motion tasks.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; Gaia Scerif; Catherine Manning; Cameron D Hassall; Laurence T Hunt; Anthony M Norcia; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Is there evidence for a noisy computation deficit in developmental dyslexia?

Authors:  Yufei Tan; Valérie Chanoine; Eddy Cavalli; Jean-Luc Anton; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.473

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.