| Literature DB >> 34781740 |
Neha Dhasmana1, Geeta Ram1, Kathleen N McAllister1, Yulia Chupalova2, Peter Lopez2, Hope F Ross1, Richard P Novick1.
Abstract
The antibacterial drone (ABD) system is based on repurposing the phage-inducible staphylococcal pathogenicity islands (SaPIs) for use as antibacterial agents that are indifferent to antibiotic resistance. The ABDs were constructed by inserting tetM for tetracycline resistance (Tcr) selection, replacing the SaPI virulence genes with bactericidal or bacteriostatic genes such as CRISPR/cas9/agrA, whose expression kills by double-strand cleavage of agrA, or CRISPR/dcas9/agrP2P3, whose expression blocks the target organism's virulence. ABD DNA is packaged in phage-like particles that attack their staphylococcal targets in vivo as well as in vitro. We determine ABD titers by transfer frequency, enumerate surviving cells as a function of multiplicity, and analyze the fate of ABD DNA with green fluorescent protein. An initial study revealed surprisingly that many more cells were killed by the ABD than were measured by transduction. Our study of this phenomenon has revealed several important features of the ABD system: (i) a significant number of entering ABD DNA molecules do not go on to establish stable transductants (i.e., are abortive); (ii) ABD cargo genes are expressed immediately following entry, even by the abortive ABDs; (iii) immediate plating on Tc-containing agar seriously underestimates particle numbers, partly owing to Tc inhibition of protein synthesis; (iv) replacement of tetM with cadA (conferring resistance to CdCl2) provides more accurate particle enumeration; (v) ABDs expressing CRISPR/cas9/agrA kill ∼99.99% of infected cells and provide the most accurate measurement of particle numbers as well as proof of principle for the system; and (vi) surprisingly, TetM interferes with stable establishment of ABD DNA independently of Tcr. IMPORTANCE For a particulate therapeutic agent, such as the ABD, accurate enumeration of particles is critical to enable evaluation of preparative procedures and calculation of therapeutic dosages. It is equally important that a selective marker used for these two purposes be biologically inert. We have long used tetM for these purposes but show here that tetM not only underestimates particle titers, by over 20-fold in some experiments, but also seriously impedes stable establishment of the therapeutic particle DNA. Given that tetM is a very convenient and widely used selective marker, publication of these findings is of considerable importance to the microbiological community as well as an interesting illustration of the unpredictable biological effects of genes taken out of their native context.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR; Staphylococcus aureus; antibacterial drone (ABD); tetracycline resistance; transduction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34781740 PMCID: PMC8593670 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02083-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1Transfer of integrated mobile element. (Left) Integrated element is excised and circularized, leaving an empty att site. It is then linearized and transferred to a recipient cell, where it either recircularizes and integrates into its att site by the Campbell mechanism or fails to integrate and becomes a linearly inherited abortive unit, which may be circularized by means of cellular or phage-encoded proteins, but its ends are not covalently joined.
FIG 2Killing versus transduction by ABD2003. (A) Killing titers were determined by mixing different numbers of ABD particles with a constant number of RN3 cells and then plating on TSB agar for survivors. Transduction titer was confirmed by mixing ABD particles with RN12414 (RN3Δagr::cadA) and plating on TSB Tc5. Graphs represent data from three independent experiments. (B) Graph represent ratios of killing MOI (MOI-K) versus MOI calculated using Tcr. MOI-K were calculated by the Poisson formula for surviving fractions in panel A.
FIG 3Effect of preincubation of transductants in the absence of Tc or CdCl2. (A) RN3 ΔagrA cells in phage buffer were infected with ABD2003 (Tcr) at an MOI-T of 0.3 and held at room temperature. Samples were removed at specific time intervals at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min, followed by dilution and spot-plating on TSB Tc5. Plates were incubated at 37°C overnight. (B) RN3 cells were infected with ABD2030 (cadA-tagged ABD2001) at an MOI-C of 0.3. The mixture was held at room temperature. Samples were removed at specific time intervals of 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min followed by dilution and spot plating on GL-Cd100. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight.
FIG 4Establishment (integration) of ABD DNA in single cells. (A) The culture from each well of the 96-well plate was serially diluted (1:5 series), and 10 μl of each dilution was spot plated on TSB and TSB Tc5. The Tcr fractions were used to calculate the number of generations before ABD integration in each well. (B) Number of wells showing ABD integration after each generation. Rightmost bar represents wells with no transductants. (C) Similar sorting experiment with ABD2034, labeled with cadA rather than tetM. Cells were plated on GL and GL-Cd100. (D) Number of wells showing ABD integration in each generation. Rightmost bar represents wells with no transductants (as in panel B). (E) Similar sorting experiment with ABD2034 and RN3 containing pCN36 (tetM). Cells were plated on GL and GL-Cd100. (F) Number of wells showing ABD integration in each generation. Rightmost bar represents wells with no transductants (as in panel B).
FIG 5Killing versus transduction by ABD2016. (A) Dose-response curve for killing of RN3 by ABD2016 (cadA-tagged ABD2003). RN3 cells in phage buffer were infected with ABD2016 (Cdr) at different MOI-C. Uninfected cells (survivors) were enumerated by plating on TSB. ND57, an isogenic Δagr mutant, was used to determine ABD2003 transduction titers. Graph represents data from three independent experiments. (B) Graph represent ratios of killing MOI (MOI-K) versus MOI calculated using Cdr. MOI-K were calculated by the Poisson formula for surviving fractions from panel A.
FIG 6Blue-white colony screening of ABD-infected cells. (A) RN3 ΔagrA+pND1 (ND58; left) and RN3 ΔagrA+pND2 (ND59; right) were infected with ABD2016 (cadA-tagged ABD2003) (Cdr) at an MOI-C of 2. The transduction titers were calculated in RN3 ΔagrA mutant on GL-Cd100 selection plates. The infection tubes were incubated at room temperature for 30 min, followed by serial dilution and plating of 100 μl of 10−5 dilution on TSB X-Gal. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight. (B) The percentage of blue cells versus total cells was calculated and correlated with survivors on one-hit killing curve assay.
FIG 7ABD establishment in native clinical strains. (A) The transduction titers were calculated using ABD2016 (cadA-tagged ABD2003) (Cdr) particles in RN3 ΔagrA, USA300 ΔagrA, RN4282 ΔagrA, and RN9130 ΔagrA strains. The graph represents data from three independent experiments. (B) The killing assays were performed using the same number of particles (RN3 titers for an MOI-C of 1). Two-tailed paired t test was used. Significant P value was set at <0.5.
FIG 8Prophage NM1-mediated interference in ABD establishment in S. aureus Newman strain. (A) Transduction titers of ABD2015 (Cdr) calculated in Newman cured of all prophages, Newman with ϕNM1 only, and Newman with all four prophages, ϕNM1-4. The bar graph represents data from three independent experiments. (B) Transduction titers of ABD2015 (Cdr) calculated in RN450 and RN450 lysogenized with prophage NM1. (C) The graph represents wells with transductants and no transductants upon single-cell sorting of GFP-labeled ABD2031 (Tcr)-infected Newman NM1 strain. The spot tests were performed on both TSB plain and TSB Tc5 plates. (D) Dilution plating of H9 wells showing total number of cells versus transductants.
Bacterial strains
| Strain | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| F− |
| |
| RN1 | NCTC8325; lysogenic for ϕ11, ϕ12, and ϕ13 |
|
| RN3 | NCTC8325; lysogenic for ϕ12 and ϕ13 | Lab collection |
| ND57 | RN3 Δ | This study |
| ND58 | ND57 (pND1) | This study |
| ND50 | ND57 (pND2) | This study |
| RN11 | RN1 (pI258); lysogenic for ϕ11, ϕ12, and ϕ13 |
|
| RN450 | NCTC8325; cured of ϕ11, ϕ12, and ϕ13 |
|
| RN6911 | RN450 Δ | Lab collection |
| RN4220 | Restriction-defective derivative of RN450 |
|
| RN12064 | RN450 80α Δ |
|
| RN12065 | RN12064 (ABD2002) |
|
| RN12066 | RN12064 (ABD2003) |
|
| RN12156 | RN450 (80α Δ |
|
| RN12407 | RN12064 (ABD2030) | This study |
| RN12408 | RN12064 (ABD2031) | This study |
| RN12414 | RN3 Δ | This study |
| ND78 | RN3 (pCN36) | This study |
| RN12344 | RN450 Δ | This study |
| RN12345 | RN12344 (ABD2002) | This study |
| RN12346 | RN12344 (ABD2003) | This study |
| RN12362 | RN12344 (ABD2015) | This study |
| RN12363 | RN12344 (ABD2016) | This study |
| RN12147 | USA300; cured of large plasmid |
|
| ND63 | RN12147 Δ | This study |
| RN4282 | Clinical TSS isolate; contains SaPI1 | Lab collection |
| RN7470 | RN4282 Δ | Lab collection |
| RN9130 | Nasal carriage isolate 502A | Lab collection |
| RN9120 | RN9130 Δ | Lab collection |
| RN10950 |
| |
| RN10951 |
| |
| RN12409 | This study | |
| RN12410 | RN450 (ϕNM1) | This study |
| ND64 | RN10950 Δ | This study |
| ND65 | RN10951 Δ | This study |
| ND32 | RN450 Δ | This study |
Plasmids and ABDs
| Plasmid or ABD serial no. | Description | Reference or source |
|---|---|---|
| Plasmid | ||
| pI258 | Low-copy-no. plasmid with theta replicon |
|
| pCN36 |
| |
| pCN51 | Shuttle vector of |
|
| pMAD | Vector for allelic replacement in |
|
| pND1 | pCN51 with insertion of | This study |
| pND2 | pND1 Δp | This study |
| pND11 | pMAD with flanked | This study |
| pND12 | pMAD with flanked | This study |
| pKM1 | pMAD with flanked | This study |
| pKM3 | pMAD with flanked | This study |
| pKM7 | pMAD with flanks for | This study |
| pND3 | pMAD with flanks for | This study |
| Serial no. | ||
| ABD2001 | SaPI2 Δ |
|
| ABD2002 | ABD2001::CRISPR/cas9/nts |
|
| ABD2003 | ABD2001::CRISPR/cas9/ |
|
| ABD2015 | ABD2002 Δ | This study |
| ABD2016 | ABD2003 Δ | This study |
| ABD2030 | ABD2001 Δ | This study |
| ABD2031 | ABD2001:: | This study |
| ABD2034 | ABD2030:: | This study |
nts, nontargeting spacer.
Primers
| Primer and function | Sequence (5′–3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Construction of ABD2031 (GFP-labeled ABD2001) | ||
| UP_2001_fwd |
| This study |
| UP_2001_rev |
| This study |
| TT_fwd |
| This study |
| TT_rev |
| This study |
| Pro-GFP-BlazTT_fwd |
| This study |
| Pro-GFP-BlazTT_rev |
| This study |
| Down_2001_fwd |
| This study |
| Down_2001_rev |
| This study |
| Construction of ABD2030 ( | ||
| Up-2001-cad_fwd |
| This study |
| Up-2001-cad_rev |
| This study |
| pro-cad-TT_fwd |
| This study |
| pro-cad-TT_rev |
| This study |
| Down-2001-cad_fwd |
| This study |
| Down-2001-cad_rev |
| This study |
| Construction of | ||
| RecA Up_fwd |
| This study |
| RecA Up_rev |
| This study |
| RecA Down_fwd |
| This study |
| RecA Down _rev |
| This study |
| Construction of pND1 and pND2 (blue/white screening) | ||
| agrA SphI fwd |
| This study |
| agrA SalI rev |
| This study |
| P-BgaB BamHI fwd |
| This study |
| P-BgaB EcoRI rev |
| This study |
| RepO-pI258 Nar1 fwd |
| This study |
| RepO-pI258 ApaI rev |
| This study |
| Construction of ABD2015 ( | ||
| 5′pMAD_agrUP 2 |
| This study |
| 3′agrUP 2 |
| This study |
| 5′agrDN 2 |
| This study |
| 3′pMAD_agrDN |
| This study |
| 5’pMAD_ABDUp |
| This study |
| 3′_CadA_ABDUp |
| This study |
| Construction of ABD2016 ( | ||
| 5’ABD_CadA |
| This study |
| 3′ABD_CadA |
| This study |
| 5’CadA_ABD_DN |
| This study |
| 3’pMAD_ABD_DN |
| This study |
| Construction of ABD2034 ( | ||
| UP 2001-C_fwd |
| This study |
| UP 2001-C_rev |
| This study |
| GFP_fwd |
| This study |
| GFP_rev |
| This study |
| Dn 2001-C_fwd |
| This study |
| Dn 2001-C_rev |
| This study |