Literature DB >> 34781304

Pressure Injury Prevalence in Acute Care Hospitals With Unit-Specific Analysis: Results From the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (IPUP) Survey Database.

Catherine A VanGilder1,2,3,4, Jill Cox1,2,3,4, Laura E Edsberg1,2,3,4, Kimberly Koloms1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine overall pressure injury (PI) prevalence and hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) prevalence in US acute care hospitals. Additionally, analysis of patient characteristics associated with HAPIs will be presented.
DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional cohort study. SUBJECTS AND
SETTING: An in-depth analysis of data was performed from the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence™ (IPUP) Survey database for years 2018-2019 that included 296,014 patients. There were 914 participating US acute care facilities in 2018 and 887 in 2019. Overall PI prevalence and HAPI prevalence over time were also examined for 2006-2019 acute care data from 2703 unique facilities (1,179,108 patients).
METHODS: Overall PI prevalence and HAPI prevalence were analyzed from the 2006-2019 IPUP survey database. Recent data for 2018-2019 PI prevalence are reported separately for medical-surgical, step-down, and critical care unit types. PI stages, anatomic locations, Braden score associated with HAPIs, and body mass index were analyzed.
RESULTS: Overall PI prevalence and HAPI prevalence data declined between 2006 and 2019; however, the prevalence plateaued in the years 2015-2019. Data from 2018 to 2019 (N = 296,014) showed that 26,562 patients (8.97%) had at least one PI and 7631 (2.58%) had at least one HAPI. Patients cared for in medical-surgical inpatient care units had the lowest overall PI prevalence (7.78%) and HAPI prevalence (1.87%), while critical care patients had the highest overall PI prevalence (14.32%) and HAPI prevalence (5.85%). Critical care patients developed more severe PIs (stage 3,4, unstageable, and deep-tissue pressure injuries [DTPIs]), which were proportionally higher than those in the step-down or medical-surgical units. The sacrum/coccyx anatomic location had the highest overall PI prevalence and HAPI prevalence, except for DTPIs, which most common occurred on the heel.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall and HAPI prevalence has plateaued 2015-2019. Prevalence of HAPIs, especially in critical care units, remain high. While medical advancements have improved survival rates among critically ill patients, survival may come with unintended consequences, including PI development.
Copyright © 2021 by the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34781304     DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs        ISSN: 1071-5754            Impact factor:   1.970


  3 in total

1.  Implementation of Pressure Injury Prevention Strategies in Acute Care: Results From the 2018-2019 International Pressure Injury Prevalence Survey.

Authors:  Laura E Edsberg; Jill Cox; Kimberly Koloms; Catherine A VanGilder-Freese
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2022 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 1.970

2.  Australian First-Year Nursing Student Knowledge and Attitudes on Pressure Injury Prevention: A Three-Year Educational Intervention Survey Study.

Authors:  Carey Mather; Angela Jacques; Sarah J Prior
Journal:  Nurs Rep       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Pressure Injuries in Critical Care Patients in US Hospitals: Results of the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey.

Authors:  Jill Cox; Laura E Edsberg; Kimberly Koloms; Catherine A VanGilder
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.970

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.