Literature DB >> 34781097

Wearable biosensors have the potential to monitor physiological changes associated with opioid overdose among people who use drugs: A proof-of-concept study in a real-world setting.

Alexis M Roth1, Nguyen K Tran2, Ben Cocchiaro3, Allison K Mitchell4, David G Schwartz5, Devon J Hensel6, Janna Ataiants4, Jacob Brenner7, Inbal Yahav8, Stephen E Lankenau4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Wearable biosensors have the potential to monitor physiological change associated with opioid overdose among people who use drugs.
METHODS: We enrolled 16 individuals who reported ≥ 4 daily opioid use events within the previous 30 day. Each was assigned a wearable biosensor that measured respiratory rate (RR) and actigraphy every 15 s for 5 days and also completed a daily interview assessing drug use. We describe the volume of RR data collected, how it varied by participant characteristics and drug use over time using repeated measures one-way ANOVA, episodes of acute respiratory depression (≤5 breaths/minute), and self-reported overdose experiences.
RESULTS: We captured 1626.4 h of RR data, an average of 21.7 daily hours/participant over follow-up. Individuals with longer injection careers and those engaging in polydrug use captured significantly fewer total hours of respiratory data over follow-up compared to those with shorter injections careers (94.7 vs. 119.9 h, p = 0.04) and injecting fentanyl exclusively (98.7 vs. 119.5 h, p = 0.008), respectively. There were 385 drug use events reported over follow-up. There were no episodes of acute respiratory depression which corresponded with participant reports of overdose experiences. DISCUSSION: Our preliminary findings suggest that using a wearable biosensor to monitor physiological changes associated with opioid use was feasible. However, more sensitive biosensors that facilitate triangulation of multiple physiological data points and larger studies of longer duration are needed.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosensor; People who use drugs; Wearable sensor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34781097      PMCID: PMC8672322          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  14 in total

Review 1.  Validity of Timeline Follow-Back for self-reported use of cannabis and other illicit substances--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carsten Rygaard Hjorthøj; Anne Rygaard Hjorthøj; Merete Nordentoft
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Opioid overdose detection using smartphones.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi Nandakumar; Shyamnath Gollakota; Jacob E Sunshine
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Cardiac Effects of Opioid Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Chen; Michael A Ashburn
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  A Framework to Evaluate Devices That Assess Physical Behavior.

Authors:  Sarah Kozey Keadle; Kate A Lyden; Scott J Strath; John W Staudenmayer; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 5.  Management of opioid analgesic overdose.

Authors:  Edward W Boyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Frequency of injecting among people who inject drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samantha Colledge; Janni Leung; Sarah Larney; Amy Peacock; Jason Grebely; Matthew Hickman; Evan Cunningham; Adam Trickey; Jack Stone; Peter Vickerman; Louisa Degenhardt
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-12-18

7.  Willingness to use a wearable device capable of detecting and reversing overdose among people who use opioids in Philadelphia.

Authors:  Katie Kanter; Ryan Gallagher; Feyisope Eweje; Alexander Lee; David Gordon; Stephen Landy; Julia Gasior; Haideliza Soto-Calderon; Peter F Cronholm; Ben Cocchiaro; James Weimer; Alexis Roth; Stephen Lankenau; Jacob Brenner
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2021-07-23

8.  Layperson reversal of opioid overdose supported by smartphone alert: A prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  David G Schwartz; Janna Ataiants; Alexis Roth; Gabriela Marcu; Inbal Yahav; Benjamin Cocchiaro; Michael Khalemsky; Stephen Lankenau
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-08-03

9.  Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Fuller; Emily Colwell; Jonathan Low; Kassia Orychock; Melissa Ann Tobin; Bo Simango; Richard Buote; Desiree Van Heerden; Hui Luan; Kimberley Cullen; Logan Slade; Nathan G A Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  A qualitative study on overdose response in the era of COVID-19 and beyond: how to spot someone so they never have to use alone.

Authors:  Melissa Perri; Natalie Kaminski; Matthew Bonn; Gillian Kolla; Adrian Guta; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Laurel Challacombe; Marilou Gagnon; Natasha Touesnard; Patrick McDougall; Carol Strike
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2021-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.