| Literature DB >> 34780509 |
Jacqueline M Wallace1, Paul O Shepherd1, John S Milne1, Raymond P Aitken1.
Abstract
The competition for nutrients in overnourished and still-growing adolescent sheep negatively impacts gestation length, colostrum supply and lamb birthweight, all of which may affect neonatal morbidity and survival to weaning. Herein perinatal complications and the requirement for supplementary feeding were analysed in relation to gestational-intake, and the degree of premature delivery and prenatal growth-restriction exhibited. Pregnancies were established by embryo transfer and the mean/standard deviation (SD) gestation length and birthweight of the optimally-fed control group (n = 100) was used to define early delivery and reduced birthweight categories (1.5 and 3.0 SDs below the control mean for each aspect). Control lambs were largely delivered at term (94%), and had a normal birthweight (92%), while very preterm (≤139days, 18.5%) and preterm delivery (140-142days, 54.8%), extremely low birthweight (ELBW; females ≤2838g and males ≤3216g, 21.1%) and low birthweight (LBW; females 2839 to ≤4001g and males 3217 to ≤4372g, 32.2%), were common in the overnourished group (n = 270, P<0.001). Accordingly, overnourished dams were more likely to lamb without assistance while the incidence of major dystocia was greater in controls. Initial lamb vigour at birth was independent of gestational-intake, delivery or birthweight category but both ELBW and very premature lambs required more assistance with feeding in the first 24h postnatal, primarily reflecting low colostrum availability. Indeed, relative to normal, ELBW lambs had a greater risk of experiencing mismothering, and enhanced likelihood of requiring supplementary feeding throughout the neonatal period (P<0.001). ELBW lambs also had a greater possibility of respiratory issues at birth (P<0.01) and renal complications (P<0.001), while very preterm delivery was associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal tract problems (P<0.01). In spite of these complications, all-cause mortality was low (5.4%) suggesting that our proactive neonatal care regime can overcome many of the issues associated with extreme prematurity and low birthweight.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34780509 PMCID: PMC8592415 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Pregnancy outcome including the incidence and extent of premature delivery and prenatal growth restriction in singleton bearing adolescent ewes offered a control intake or overnourished throughout gestation.
| Gestational intake | Control | Overnourished | ¢P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of pregnancies | 100 | 270 | |
| Gestation length, days | 145.2±0.18 | 141.2±0.13 |
|
| Incidence of | |||
| | 0 (0) | 50 (18.5) |
|
| | 6 (6) | 148 (54.8) |
|
| Term delivery, n (%) | 94 (94) | 72 (26.7) |
|
| Very preterm gestation length, days | n/a | 137.9±0.16 | n/a |
| Preterm gestation length, days | 141.5±0.34 | 141.0±0.06 | 0.204 |
| Term gestation length, days | 145.4±0.17 | 143.7±0.11 |
|
| Placental weight, g | 429±11.6 | 311±6.5 |
|
| Fetal cotyledon weight, g | 141.1±4.32 | 83.8±2.14 |
|
| Lamb girth at umbilicus, mm | 39.9±0.32 | 36.5±0.27 |
|
| Lamb birth weight, g | 5339±78 | 4005±67 |
|
| Incidence of | |||
| | 0 (0) | 57 (21.1) |
|
| | 8 (8) | 87 (32.2) |
|
| Normal birth weight, n (%) | 68 (68) | 113 (41.9) |
|
| Oversized birth weight, n (%) | 24 (24) | 13 (4.8) |
|
| Extremely low birth weight, g | n/a | 2419±60 | n/a |
| Low birth weight, g | 3946±93 | 3696±37 | 0.051 |
| Normal birth weight, g | 5148±56 | 4806±42 |
|
| Oversized birth weight, g | 6346±85 | 6069±66 |
|
| Male:female ratio | |||
| Overall | 45:55 | 146:124 | 0.129 |
| Very premature lambs | n/a | 21:29 | n/a |
| Extremely low birth weight lambs | n/a | 32:25 | n/a |
| Oversized birth weight | 14:10 | 10:3 | 0.305 |
βClassified as preterm or very preterm delivery if gestation length was less than 1.5 or 3.0 standard deviations below the mean control gestation length, respectively, i.e. 140–142 days for preterm and ≤139 days for very preterm.
¥Classified as low birthweight (LBW) or extremely low birthweight (ELBW) if weight at delivery was less than 1.5 or 3.0 standard deviations below the sex-specific birthweight of the optimally nourished control group. Thus for LBW and ELBW categories: females ≥2839 to 4001g, and ≤2838g, respectively, and for males ≥3217 to 4372g, and ≤3216g, respectively. Lambs classified as oversized if birthweight was in the upper quartile for control lambs (5831-7650g). Continuous data analysed by ANOVA and categorical data by Fisher’s exact test. Significant P values indicated in bold font.
Fig 1Individual birth parameters for study population in relation to gestational intake.
Distribution of gestation length (a) and relationship between total fetal cotyledon weight and birthweight (b), and between gestation length and birthweight (c), in singleton bearing adolescent ewes offered a control intake or overnourished throughout pregnancy. For control (grey symbols) and overnourished (black symbols) pregnancies in (b) r = 0.687 and 0.808, and in (c) r = 0.484 and 0.430, all P<0.001.
Incidence of dystocia in singleton bearing adolescent ewes offered a control intake or overnourished throughout gestation.
| Dystocia category | Description | Control n (%) | Overnourished n (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No assistance | Unassisted, often unsupervised. | 0 (0) | 27 (10) |
|
| Minimal assistance | Uncomplicated, ewe could have delivered lamb herself. | 56 (56) | 141 (52) | 0.558 |
| Moderate assistance | Malpresented (e.g. leg(s) back; head back, down or twisted; breach), or fetopelvic disproportion. | 12 (12) | 51 (18.8) | 0.160 |
| Major assistance | Malpresented or fetopelvic disproportion or incomplete dilation of cervix, and requiring considerable sustained effort to deliver lamb. Ewe required pain relief ± antibiotic | 29 (29) | 47 (17.4) |
|
| Caesarean section | Surgical delivery due to fetal oversize or un-dilated cervix. | 3 (3) | 4 (1.5) | 0.393 |
Fig 2Gestation length and birthweight in relation to dystocia category.
Average lamb birthweight (a) and gestation length (b) in relation to degree of assistance required at delivery, and the main underlying cause. Where superscript letters differ P<0.01.
Initial colostrum yield, lamb vigour and maternal behaviour during the first 24h after delivery in singleton bearing adolescent ewes offered a control intake or overnourished throughout gestation.
| Gestational intake | Control | Overnourished | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average colostrum yield, ml | 467±38.1 | 186±9.1 |
|
| 33 of 97 (34%) | 159 of 266 (59.8%) |
| |
| No. with less than 50ml colostrum at parturition | 3 (3.1%) | 58 (21.8%) |
|
| • bottle (optimum) | 83 (86.5%) | 232 (87.9%) | 0.720 |
| • bottle then stomach tube | 10 (10.4%) | 19 (7.2%) | 0.380 |
| • stomach tube | 3 (3.1%) | 13 (4.9%) | 0.574 |
| 0.4±0.08 | 1.5±0.11 |
| |
| • no assistance beyond initial feed (optimum) | 66 (67.3%) | 111 (42.2%) |
|
| • minimal assistance, 1 or > feeds by bottle | 15 (15.3%) | 111 (42.2%) |
|
| • moderate assistance, 1 or 2 feeds by tube | 16 (16.3%) | 30 (11.4%) | 0.217 |
| • major assistance, 3 or > feeds by tube | 1 (1%) | 11 (4.1%) | 0.192 |
| • appropriate ewe-lamb bond | 92 (93.9%) | 243 (92.0%) | 0.657 |
| • ewe gently restrained to allow suckling | 6 (6.1%) | 13 (4.9%) | 0.796 |
| • ewe harms or attempts to harm | 0 | 8 (3.0%) | 0.114 |
Values are mean±sem or number (percent). Missing or incomplete colostrum yield data for 3 control and 4 overnourished dams.
αDefined based on requirement of 50ml per kg fetal weight.
βSee methods text for more detail.
¥excludes initial colostrum administration.
¢Continuous data analysed by ANOVA and categorical data by Fishers Exact test. Significant P values indicated in bold font.
Initial colostrum yield, lamb vigour and maternal behaviour during the first 24h after delivery in relation to birthweight and delivery categories.
| Birthweight or delivery category | ELBW | LBW | Normal | Very premature | Premature | Term | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total no. of pregnancies | 57 | 95 | 218 | 50 | 154 | 166 | ||
| Gestation length, days | 139.9±0.32a | 141.4±0.20b | 143.3±0.17c |
| 137.9±0.16a | 141.1±0.06b | 144.7±0.12c |
|
| Lamb birth weight, g | 2419±59a | 3717±36b | 5157±46c |
| 3123±154a | 4084±74b | 5001±80c |
|
| Average colostrum yield, ml | 95±15.1a | 179±11.7a | 339±20.7b |
| 140±19.7a | 192±12.4a | 361±25.8b |
|
| 39 (70.9)a | 51 (54.2)b | 102(49.7)b |
| 32 (66.6)a | 91 (59.9)a | 69 (42.3)b |
| |
| No. with less than 50ml colostrum at parturition | 29 (52.7)a | 10 (10.6)b | 22 (10.2)b |
| 17 (35.4)a | 29 (19.1)b | 15 (9.2)c |
|
| • bottle (optimum) | 44 (84.6) | 82 (86.3) | 189 (87.5) | 0.766 | 36 (80) | 136 (88.3) | 145 (88.4) | 0.287 |
| • bottle then tube | 5 (9.6) | 7 (7.4) | 17 (7.9) | 0.895 | 4 (8.9) | 13 (8.4) | 13 (7.9) | 0.973 |
| • stomach tube | 3 (5.8) | 5 (5.3) | 8 (3.7) | 0.728 | 5 (11.1) | 5 (3.0) | 6 (3.6) | 0.064 |
| 3.7±0.28a | 1.3 ±0.14b | 0.6±0.07c |
| 2.4±0.36a | 1.4±0.13b | 0.8±0.10c |
| |
| • no assistance beyond initial feed (optimum) | 7 (13.7)a | 36 (38.3)b | 134 (62.0)c |
| 15 (34.1)a | 65 (42.5)a | 98 (59.8)b |
|
| • minimal assistance, 1 or > feeds by bottle | 30 (58.8)a | 42 (44.7)a | 54 (25.0)b |
| 19 (43.1)ab | 64 (41.8)a | 43 (26.2)b |
|
| • moderate assistance, 1 or 2 feeds by tube | 7 (13.7) | 14 (14.9) | 25 (11.6) | 0.704 | 6 (13.6) | 19 (12.4) | 21 (12.8) | 0.986 |
| • major assistance, 3 or > feeds by tube | 7 (13.7)a | 2 (2.1)b | 3 (1.4)b |
| 5 (11.4)a | 5 (3.2)ab | 2 (1.2)b |
|
| • appropriate ewe-lamb bond | 44 (84.6) | 86 (90.5) | 205 (95.3) |
| 41 (91.1) | 141 (92.1) | 153 (93.3) | 0.861 |
| • ewe gently restrained to allow suckling | 4 (7.7) | 6 (6.3) | 9 (4.2) | 0.514 | 1 (2.2) | 9 (5.9) | 9 (5.5) | 0.615 |
| • ewe harms or attempts to harm | 4 (7.7) | 3 (3.1) | 1 (0.5) |
| 3 (6.6) | 3 (2.0) | 2 (1.2) | 0.068 |
Values are mean ± sem or number (percent). Missing or incomplete colostrum yield data for 7 pregnancies; no initial vigour score for 7 lambs.
who died at or soon after delivery, no vigour score for a further 2 lambs who died within 24h.
αDefined based on requirement of 50ml per kg.
fetal weight.
βSee methods text for more detail.
¥excludes initial colostrum administration. ELBW, extremely low birthweight and LBW, low birthweight, very premature and premature delivery as detailed in the methods text.
¢For birthweight and delivery categories separately continuous data analysed by ANOVA followed post hoc by Fishers lsd method and categorical data by chi-squared. Where superscripts differ within rows for birthweight or delivery categories, P<0.01. Significant P values indicated in bold font.
Risk of an impaired ewe-lamb bond and likelihood of requiring supplementary feeding during the neonatal period in relation to delivery and birthweight category.
| 4–6 feeds by tube or bottle from birth to 24h | 4 or > feeds by tube or bottle from 24 to 96h after delivery | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of affected lambs | Rate (%) | 27 (7.4%) | 23 (6.5%) | 46 (12.8%) | 30 (8.4%) |
| Categorical predictors | |||||
| Very premature vs term | OR (95% CI) | 0.64 (0.15–2.70) | 0.29 (0.06–1.33) | 1.96 (0.59–6.48) | 1.70 (0.49–5.92) |
| Premature vs. term | OR (95% CI) | 0.93 (0.33–2.58) | 0.75 (0.24–2.32) | 1.00 (0.35–2.79) | 0.90 (0.30–2.66) |
| Very premature vs prem | OR (95% CI) | 0.69 (0.19–2.48) | 0.38 (0.10–1.49) | 1.96 (0.73–5.28) | 1.89 (0.66–5.40) |
| ELBW vs. normal | OR (95% CI) |
|
|
|
|
| LBW vs. normal | OR (95% CI) | 2.50 (0.88–7.06) | 1.08 (0.24–4.75) | 2.30 (0.74–7.15) | 1.56 (0.49–4.93) |
| ELBW vs. LBW | OR (95% CI) | 1.99 (0.67–5.85) |
|
|
|
Odds ratios and 95% confidence limits from binary logistic regression adjusted for gestational intake group and lamb sex
**P<0.01
***P<0.001.
¥Impaired ewe-lamb bond when ewe had to be gently restrained to facilitate suckling or when ewe had harmed or attempted to harm the lamb.
Risk of respiratory issues at birth, neonatal morbidity or mortality in relation to delivery and birthweight category.
| Respiratory issues at birth | Gastrointestinal tract complications | Renal complications | Mortality | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of affected lambs | Rate (%) | 32 (8.6%) | 13 (3.5%) | 19 (5.1%) | 38 (10.3%) | 20 (5.4%) |
| Categorical predictors | ||||||
| Very premature vs term | OR (95% CI) | 3.16 (0.87–11.49) |
| 0.66 (0.13–3.31) |
| 4.57 (0.96–21.58) |
| Premature vs. term | OR (95% CI) | 1.64 (0.52–5.13) | 1.94 (0.24–15.15) | 0.98 (0.21–4.58) | 1.76 (0.57–5.43) | 0.74 (0.15–3.55) |
| Very premature vs prem | OR (95% CI) | 1.92 (0.73–5.03) |
| 0.67 (0.19–2.33) |
|
|
| ELBW vs. normal | OR (95% CI) |
| 0.21 (0.03–1.28) |
|
|
|
| LBW vs. normal | OR (95% CI) | 1.56 (0.56–4.31) | 0.73 (0.19–2.84) | 4.33 (0.17–107.13) | 1.27 (0.43–3.69) | 3.22 (0.73–14.21) |
| ELBW vs. LBW | OR (95% CI) | 2.49 (0.90–6.92) | 0.28 (0.04–1.83) |
|
| 2.33 (0.66–8.19) |
α Neonatal morbidity if lamb had one or more complications requiring remedial treatment for pneumonia, a gastrointestinal tract infection which did not resolve within 24h, or renal issues (see methods text for description). Mortality includes lambs that died or were euthanized for welfare reasons within the first 4 weeks postnatal. Adjusted for gestational intake group and lamb sex. Odds ratios and 95% confidence limits from binary logistic regression
*P<0.05
**P<0.01
***P<0.001.
Fig 3Supplementary feeding and indices of growth in relation to birthweight and delivery categories.
Boxplots illustrating the number of supplementary feeds from 4 to 24h (a), and between 24 to 72h (b) after birth in relation to birthweight and delivery classifications, with mean (X) and exclusive median (_). Relationship between birthweight and neonatal liveweight gain (c), and between birthweight and fractional growth rate to 72h (d) and 77 days postnatal (e), together with final weight at weaning for birthweight and delivery categories (f). For (a) and (b) birthweight was significant (P<0.001/P = 0.001), but not delivery category (P = 0.362/P = 0.974), or the interaction (P = 0.166/P = 0.173). For extremely low (black circles), low (open circles) and normal (grey circles) birthweight lambs in (c) r = 0.552 (P<0.001), 0.206 and 0.066 (both ns); in (d) r = 0.190, -0.120 (both ns) and -0.357 (P<0.001); in (e) r = -0.709, -0.423 and -0.766 (all P<0.001). In (f) birthweight (P<0.001) and delivery (P = 0.034) categories, and sex (males>females, P<0.001) were significant but none of the interactions between them.
Impact of gestation length, birthweight, sex and supplementary milk feeding in the neonatal period on growth to weaning at 77days of age in singleton lambs (n = 341).
| Liveweight gain to weaning, g/day | Fractional growth to weaning, %/day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Β coefficient (SE) | P-value | Β coefficient (SE) | P-value | |
| Gestation length, days | -0.537 (0.986) | 0.586 | 0.037 (0.030) | 0.208 |
| Birthweight, kg | 16.42 (2.45) |
| -1.953 (0.073) |
|
| Colostrum yield, g | -0.017 (0.008) | 0.051 | -0.0000 (0.0002) | 0.858 |
| Female sex | -26.86 (4.06) |
| -0.667 (0.122) |
|
| No. of supplementary milk feeds, 4 to 72h | -3.017 (0.758) |
| 0.036 (0.0228) | 0.108 |
No. of supplementary feeds varies from 0 to 19 (excludes initial colostrum feed).