| Literature DB >> 34779835 |
Merle S Schenk1,2, Andreas Wartak1,3, Verena Buehler1,4, Jie Zhao1, Guillermo J Tearney1,5,6, Reginald Birngruber1,4, Stefan Kassumeh1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the most peripheral corneal nerve plexus using high-resolution micro-optical coherence tomography (µOCT) imaging and to assess µOCT's clinical potential as a screening tool for corneal and systemic diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34779835 PMCID: PMC8606792 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.13.22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Figure 1.Swine en face µOCT images of different characteristic morphology features compared to FCM. (A, E) Segmented en face µOCT raw image. (B, F) Semiautomatic nerve tracking with NeuronJ. (C, G) Nerve skeleton of nerve traces (in magenta). (D, H) β3 Tubulin-stained FCM images. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Figure 2.Comparison of µOCT and FCM nerve quantity, both showing the same morphologic features in NHPs. (A) Segmented en face µOCT image. (B) Semiautomatic nerve tracking, tracked with NeuronJ. (C) Nerve skeleton and sum nerve length. (D) FCM 10× magnification/NA 0.40. (E) FCM excerpt of vortex proximate nerves. (F) Nerve skeleton and sum nerve length.
Figure 3.Investigating homogeneity of SNF distribution within µOCT FoV, en face µOCT, semiautomatic nerve segmentation, and quantitative evaluation with NeuronJ. (A) 2,514.07 µm. (B) 2,991.03 µm. (C) 3,741.10 µm. (D) 3,971.74 µm. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Figure 4.SNF tracking in NHP with Simple Neurite Tracer, marked in magenta. (A) 3D model view of SBP fiber distribution and corneal layers in a single plane embedded in the lower epithelium. (B) En face view of two different µOCT slices without and with marked SNFs in magenta. (C, D) 3D model view µOCT from different angles. Epi, epithelium; Str, stroma.
Nerve Density of the SBP in Swine and NHP Corneas
| Swine | NHP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cornea | Sum Nerve Length, µm | Nerve Density, mm/mm2 | Sum Nerve Length, µm | Nerve Density, mm/mm2 |
| 1 | 6810 | 13.90 | 7530 | 15.37 |
| 2 | 8360 | 17.06 | 9720 | 19.84 |
| 3 | 6590 | 13.45 | 10,090 | 20.59 |
| 4 | 7530 | 15.37 | 8310 | 16.96 |
| 5 | 4660 | 9.51 | 11,880 | 24.24 |
| Mean | 6790 | 13.86 | 9510 | 19.41 |
Comparison of 2D and 3D Tracking Tool for Nerve Density Quantification
| Analysis Tool and Dimension | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sample | 3D SNT, mm/mm2 | 2D NeuronJ, mm/mm2 |
| 1 | 26.73 | 26.36 |
| 2 | 26.07 | 22.64 |
| 3 | 15.94 | 14.56 |
Nerve density quantification of the SBP (in mm/mm2), quantified in the 3D tracking program SNT in comparison to the 2D program NeuronJ in three swine and NHP corneas (samples 1 and 2 = NHP, sample 3 = swine) with µOCT recordings (700 × 700 µm image size).
Repeatability Evaluation of SBP Density
| Swine, mm/mm2 | NHP, mm/mm2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | |||
| Scan 1 | 19.90 | 15.36 | Sample 3 | Sample 1 | Sample 2 |
| Scan 2 | 17.07 | 15.94 | 13.45 | 26.07 | 14.41 |
| Scan 3 | 16.61 | 14.77 | 12.26 | 26.72 | 17.34 |
| Scan 4 | 14.78 | 13.49 | 10.42 | 23.89 | 13.90 |
| Standard deviation, 1/mm | 2.12 | 1.05 | — | 23.43 | 19.84 |
| Mean, mm/mm2 | 17.09 | 14.89 | 1.53 | 1.61 | 2.77 |
| RSD | 0.12 | 0.07 | 12.04 | 25.03 | 16,387.45 |
| %RSD | 12.39 | 7.05 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.17 |
| Average %RSD | 11.24 | 12.67 | 7.21 | 16.90 | |
Repeatability evaluation of SBP density quantification (in mm/mm2) of three or four repeated µOCT scans of swine (n = 3) and NHP (n = 2) corneas. RSD, relative standard deviation.