| Literature DB >> 34779698 |
Zeliha Yelda Özer1, Sevgi Özcan1, Gülşah Seydaoğlu2, Hatice Kurdak1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the accumulated evidence suggesting the positive aspects of using group visits in obesity, the number of qualitative studies that examine why and how the effects occur at an individual level is limited.Entities:
Keywords: Qualitative designs and methods; group medical visits; life trauma; weight stigma
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34779698 PMCID: PMC8604469 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1998446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Gen Pract ISSN: 1381-4788 Impact factor: 1.904
The characteristics of the participants.
| Patient code (Enrolling order – Weight Maintenance on follow-up) | Age (years) | Education level/employment* | Relationship | Number of children | Weight change percentage (After the group visits) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1–R | 36 | Master / Employed | Married | None | −4.0 |
| P2–R | 48 | High school / Housewife | Married | 2 | −7.1 |
| P3–NC | 40 | High school / Housewife | Married | 2 | +4.1 |
| P4–NC | 21 | College / Student | Single | None | +1.3 |
| P5–M | 42 | College / Employed | Married | 2 | −3.7 |
| P6–R | 36 | College / Employed | Single | None | −12.6 |
| P7–R | 49 | Master / Employed | Married | 2 | −12.7 |
| P8–M | 40 | Master / Employed | Married | 2 | −7.3 |
| P9–M | 50 | High school / Employed | Married | 2 | −10.9 |
| P10–M | 35 | Master / Employed | Married | 1 | −10.5 |
| P11–R | 41 | College / Employed | Married | 2 | −6.9 |
| P12–R | 22 | College / Student | Single | None | −5.1 |
| P13–M | 41 | Master / Employed | Married | 1 | −7.0 |
| P14–M | 42 | Elementary / Housewife | Married | 4 | −13.4 |
| P15–M | 54 | Elementary / Housewife | Widow | 2 | −12.8 |
| P16–M | 46 | College / Employed | Married | 2 | −4.7 |
| P17–R | 43 | College / Employed | Married | 2 | −16.2 |
| P18–M | 40 | Master / Employed | Married | 2 | −17.1 |
| P19–R | 23 | College / Student | Single | None | −11.5 |
| P20–M | 21 | College / Student | Single | None | −3.3 |
*Education/occupation and relationship are blunted (given as a general description of confidentiality issues).
M: Maintained; defined as the participants who lost weight after the group visits and either lost more or did not gain weight at the end of the follow-up.
R: Regained; defined as the participants who lost weight after the group visits and regained weight at the end of the follow-up.
NC: Negative cases; defined as the participants who gained weight after the group visits and continued to gain weight at the end of the follow-up.