Veer Sangha1, Kasia Lipska2,3, Zhenqiu Lin1,4, Silvio E Inzucchi3, Darren K McGuire5, Harlan M Krumholz1,4,6, Rohan Khera1,4. 1. Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT (V.S.). 2. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT (K.L., Z.L., H.M.K., R.K.). 3. Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism (K.L., S.E.I.), Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 4. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine (Z.L., H.M.K., R.K.), Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas (D.K.M.). 6. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (H.M.K.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence from large randomized clinical trials supports the benefit of SGLT2i (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) to improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease. Considering this evidence, which has been expanding since the product label indication for empagliflozin to reduce risk of cardiovascular death in 2016, clinician-level variation in the prescription of SGLT2i among US Medicare beneficiaries was evaluated. METHODS: Antihyperglycemic medication prescribers were identified as those physicians and advanced practice providers prescribing metformin in Medicare part D prescriber data. In this cross-sectional study, the proportion prescribing SGLT2i was assessed overall and across specialties in 2018, with changes assessed from 2014 to 2018. SGLT2i use was compared with other second-line antihyperglycemic medication classes, sulfonylureas and DPP4is (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors). RESULTS: Among 232 523 unique clinicians who prescribed metformin for Medicare beneficiaries in 2018 (diabetes-treating clinicians), 45 255 (19.5%) prescribed SGLT2i. There was substantial variation across specialties-from 72% of endocrinologists to 14% of cardiologists who prescribed metformin also prescribed SGLT2i. Between 2014 and 2018, the number prescribing SGLT2i increased 5-fold from 9048 in 2014 to 45 255 in 2018. Among clinicians who prescribed both sulfonylureas and SGLT2i in 2018, SGLT2i was prescribed to a median 33 beneficiaries for every 100 prescribed sulfonylureas (interquartile range, 18-67). SGLT2i use relative to sulfonylureas increased from 19 (interquartile range, 11-34) per 100 in 2014 to 33 (interquartile range, 18-67) per 100 in 2018 (Ptrend<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percent of clinicians prescribing metformin to Medicare beneficiaries did not prescribe SGLT2i in 2018. Moreover, sulfonylureas prescriptions were 3 times more frequent than those of SGLT2is, although a pattern of increasing uptake may portend future trends. These findings highlight a baseline opportunity to improve care and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Evidence from large randomized clinical trials supports the benefit of SGLT2i (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) to improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease. Considering this evidence, which has been expanding since the product label indication for empagliflozin to reduce risk of cardiovascular death in 2016, clinician-level variation in the prescription of SGLT2i among US Medicare beneficiaries was evaluated. METHODS: Antihyperglycemic medication prescribers were identified as those physicians and advanced practice providers prescribing metformin in Medicare part D prescriber data. In this cross-sectional study, the proportion prescribing SGLT2i was assessed overall and across specialties in 2018, with changes assessed from 2014 to 2018. SGLT2i use was compared with other second-line antihyperglycemic medication classes, sulfonylureas and DPP4is (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors). RESULTS: Among 232 523 unique clinicians who prescribed metformin for Medicare beneficiaries in 2018 (diabetes-treating clinicians), 45 255 (19.5%) prescribed SGLT2i. There was substantial variation across specialties-from 72% of endocrinologists to 14% of cardiologists who prescribed metformin also prescribed SGLT2i. Between 2014 and 2018, the number prescribing SGLT2i increased 5-fold from 9048 in 2014 to 45 255 in 2018. Among clinicians who prescribed both sulfonylureas and SGLT2i in 2018, SGLT2i was prescribed to a median 33 beneficiaries for every 100 prescribed sulfonylureas (interquartile range, 18-67). SGLT2i use relative to sulfonylureas increased from 19 (interquartile range, 11-34) per 100 in 2014 to 33 (interquartile range, 18-67) per 100 in 2018 (Ptrend<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percent of clinicians prescribing metformin to Medicare beneficiaries did not prescribe SGLT2i in 2018. Moreover, sulfonylureas prescriptions were 3 times more frequent than those of SGLT2is, although a pattern of increasing uptake may portend future trends. These findings highlight a baseline opportunity to improve care and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Muthiah Vaduganathan; Vasanth Sathiyakumar; Avinainder Singh; Cian P McCarthy; Arman Qamar; James L Januzzi; Benjamin M Scirica; Javed Butler; Christopher P Cannon; Deepak L Bhatt Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-12-25 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon; Silvio E Inzucchi; Lars Køber; Mikhail N Kosiborod; Felipe A Martinez; Piotr Ponikowski; Marc S Sabatine; Inder S Anand; Jan Bělohlávek; Michael Böhm; Chern-En Chiang; Vijay K Chopra; Rudolf A de Boer; Akshay S Desai; Mirta Diez; Jaroslaw Drozdz; Andrej Dukát; Junbo Ge; Jonathan G Howlett; Tzvetana Katova; Masafumi Kitakaze; Charlotta E A Ljungman; Béla Merkely; Jose C Nicolau; Eileen O'Meara; Mark C Petrie; Pham N Vinh; Morten Schou; Sergey Tereshchenko; Subodh Verma; Claes Held; David L DeMets; Kieran F Docherty; Pardeep S Jhund; Olof Bengtsson; Mikaela Sjöstrand; Anna-Maria Langkilde Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hiddo J L Heerspink; Bergur V Stefánsson; Ricardo Correa-Rotter; Glenn M Chertow; Tom Greene; Fan-Fan Hou; Johannes F E Mann; John J V McMurray; Magnus Lindberg; Peter Rossing; C David Sjöström; Roberto D Toto; Anna-Maria Langkilde; David C Wheeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David Fitchett; Silvio E Inzucchi; Christopher P Cannon; Darren K McGuire; Benjamin M Scirica; Odd Erik Johansen; Steven Sambevski; Stefan Kaspers; Egon Pfarr; Jyothis T George; Bernard Zinman Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lauren A Eberly; Lin Yang; Nwamaka D Eneanya; Utibe Essien; Howard Julien; Ashwin S Nathan; Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Elias J Dayoub; Alexander C Fanaroff; Jay Giri; Peter W Groeneveld; Srinath Adusumalli Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Jonathan Hanna; Arash A Nargesi; Utibe R Essien; Veer Sangha; Zhenqiu Lin; Harlan M Krumholz; Rohan Khera Journal: Am J Prev Cardiol Date: 2022-08-02