| Literature DB >> 34778586 |
Priscilla Cecilia Akpene Amenya1,2, Reginald Adjetey Annan2, Charles Apprey2, Elvis Nutifafa Agbley1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nutrition knowledge contributes significantly to the nutritional status and habits of individuals as it influences their food consumption. And body mass index (BMI) of individuals. Recent data suggests a relationship between nutrition and physical activity knowledge, attitude, practices, and anthropometric indices of Ghanaian children.Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index; Nutrition knowledge; Nutritional status; Physical activity knowledge; School-age children
Year: 2021 PMID: 34778586 PMCID: PMC8577141 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Socio-demographic characteristics of school-aged children.
| Sociodemographic, n = 591 | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Boys | 266 | 45.0 |
| Girls | 325 | 55.0 |
| 8–9 years | 114 | 19.3 |
| 10 years | 187 | 31.6 |
| 11–13 years | 290 | 49.1 |
| Public school | 391 | 66.2 |
| Private school | 200 | 33.8 |
Level of nutrition and physical activity knowledge among school-aged children.
| Variable | Frequency, n = 586 | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Poor, less than 46.7% | 273 | 46.6 |
| Good, 46.7%–69.9% | 230 | 39.2 |
| Excellent, ≥70.0% | 83 | 14.2 |
| Poor, less than 65% | 292 | 49.8 |
| Good, ≥65% | 294 | 50.2 |
| Poor, less than 54% | 255 | 43.5 |
| Good, 54%–69.9% | 223 | 38.1 |
| Excellent, ≥70.0% | 108 | 18.4 |
NutPA- Nutrition and Physical Activity.
Relationship between socio-demographic and level of nutrition and physical activity knowledge.
| Variable | Gender | p value | Age (Years) | p value | School Type | p value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | 8–9 | 10 | 11–13 | Public | Private | ||||
| 0.694 | 0.924 | |||||||||
| Poor | 128 (48.5) | 145 (45.2) | 56 (49.6) | 81 (46.8) | 124 (44.9) | 199 (51.8) | 74 (36.6) | |||
| Good | 101 (38.3) | 128 (39.9) | 43 (38.1) | 67 (38.7) | 110 (39.9) | 139 (36.2) | 91 (45.0) | |||
| Excellent | 35 (13.3) | 48 (15.0) | 14 (12.4) | 25 (14.5) | 42 (15.2) | 46 (12.0) | 37 (18.3) | |||
| 0.245 | 0.140 | |||||||||
| Poor | 124 (47.0) | 167 (52.0) | 64 (56.6) | 96 (55.5) | 125 (45.3) | 200 (52.1) | 92 (45.5) | |||
| Good | 140 (53.0) | 154 (48.0) | 49 (43.4) | 77 (44.5) | 151 (54.7) | 184 (47.9) | 110 (54.5) | |||
| 0.265 | ||||||||||
| Poor | 107 (40.5) | 148 (46.1) | 53 (46.9) | 84 (48.6) | 108 (39.1) | 187 (48.7) | 68 (33.7) | |||
| Good | 115 (43.6) | 107 (33.3) | 43 (38.1) | 60 (34.7) | 110 (39.9) | 132 (34.4) | 91 (45.0) | |||
| Excellent | 42 (15.9) | 66 (20.6) | 17 (15.0) | 29 (16.8) | 58 (21.0) | 65 (16.9) | 43 (21.3) | |||
NutPA- Nutrition and Physical Activity. Data are presented as frequency (percentage). Bold p-values are significant.
Fischer's exact p-value.
Chi-square p-value, P value is significant at p < 0.05.
Perception, attitude, and practices of nutrition.
| Nutrition | Frequency, n | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Not good | 38 | 6.6 |
| Not sure | 72 | 12.4 |
| Good | 470 | 81.0 |
| Not good | 75 | 13.1 |
| Not sure | 98 | 17.1 |
| Good | 399 | 69.8 |
| Weakness | 66 | 24.4 |
| Paleness | 23 | 8.5 |
| Spoon nails | 4 | 1.5 |
| Likely to become sick | 8 | 3.0 |
| Others | 170 | 62.7 |
| Weakness | 50 | 16.4 |
| Likely to become sick | 24 | 7.9 |
| Night blindness | 37 | 12.1 |
| Others | 20 | 6.6 |
| Do not know | 174 | 57.0 |
| Not difficult | 452 | 78.1 |
| So-so | 49 | 8.5 |
| Difficult | 78 | 13.5 |
| Not difficult | 424 | 75.6 |
| So-so | 46 | 8.2 |
| Difficult | 91 | 16.2 |
| Not difficult | 409 | 73.3 |
| So-so | 54 | 9.7 |
| Difficult | 95 | 17.0 |
| Yes | 484 | 82.5 |
| No | 103 | 17.5 |
| Yes | 292 | 51.2 |
| No | 272 | 47.7 |
| Do not know | 6 | 1.1 |
| Yes | 523 | 89.9 |
| No | 59 | 10.1 |
| Yes | 565 | 97.2 |
| No | 16 | 2.8 |
Relationship between nutrition and physical activity knowledge and BMI-for-age.
| Variable | BMI-for-age | X2 | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasted | Normal | Overweight | Obese | |||
| 4.747 | 0.577 | |||||
| Poor | 8 (3.0) | 208 (79.1) | 31 (11.8) | 16 (6.1) | ||
| Good | 8 (3.7) | 180 (82.2) | 20 (9.1) | 11 (5.0) | ||
| Excellent | 4 (4.8) | 70 (84.3) | 8 (9.6) | 1 (1.2) | ||
| 9.46 | ||||||
| Poor | 4 (1.4) | 239 (85.1) | 26 (9.3) | 12 (4.3) | ||
| Good | 16 (5.6) | 219 (77.1) | 33 (11.6) | 16 (5.6) | ||
| 3.336 | 0.766 | |||||
| Poor | 6 (2.5) | 202 (83.1) | 25 (10.3) | 10 (4.1) | ||
| Good | 9 (4.1) | 171 (78.8) | 23 (10.6) | 14 (6.5) | ||
| Excellent | 5 (4.8) | 85 (81.0) | 11 (10.5) | 4 (3.8) | ||
Data is presented as frequency (percentage), Chi-square p value is significant at p < 0.05. Bold p-values are significant.
Association between nutrition, physical activity knowledge, and BMI-for-age.
| Variable | BMI-for-age | Nut | PA | Total NutPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI-for-age | 1 | 0.095 (0.026) ∗ | 0.080 (0.062) | 0.151 (<0.001) ∗∗ |
| Total NutPA | 0.115 (0.007) ∗ | 0.853 (<0.001) ∗∗ | 0.722 (<0.001) ∗∗ | 1 |
They are adjusting for age, gender, and school. Nut- Nutrition knowledge, PA- Physical activity knowledge, Total NutPA- Nutrition and Physical activity knowledge, Data presented as correlation coefficient, r (p-value). P-value is significant at p < 0.05∗, p < 0.01∗∗.