| Literature DB >> 34778381 |
Chen Lyu1, Stefano Da Vela2, Youssra Al-Hilaly3, Karen E Marshall3, Richard Thorogate4, Dmitri Svergun2, Louise C Serpell3, Annalisa Pastore1, Diane P Hanger1.
Abstract
Tau35 is a truncated form of tau found in human brain in a subset of tauopathies. Tau35 expression in mice recapitulates key features of human disease, including progressive increase in tau phosphorylation, along with cognitive and motor dysfunction. The appearance of aggregated tau suggests that Tau35 may have structural properties distinct from those of other tau species that could account for its pathological role in disease. To address this hypothesis, we performed a structural characterization of monomeric and aggregated Tau35 and compared the results to those of two longer isoforms, 2N3R and 2N4R tau. We used small angle X-ray scattering to show that Tau35, 2N3R and 2N4R tau all behave as disordered monomeric species but Tau35 exhibits higher rigidity. In the presence of the poly-anion heparin, Tau35 increases thioflavin T fluorescence significantly faster and to a greater extent than full-length tau, demonstrating a higher propensity to aggregate. By using atomic force microscopy, circular dichroism, transmission electron microscopy and X-ray fiber diffraction, we provide evidence that Tau35 aggregation is mechanistically and morphologically similar to previously reported tau fibrils but they are more densely packed. These data increase our understanding of the aggregation inducing properties of clinically relevant tau fragments and their potentially damaging role in the pathogenesis of human tauopathies.Entities:
Keywords: biophysical studies; dementia; hybrid methods; intrinsically disordered proteins; neurodegeneration; small angle x-ray scattering; tau truncation; tauopathy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34778381 PMCID: PMC8581542 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.779240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
FIGURE 1Size-exclusion chromatography of recombinant tau species. Gel filtration (Superdex 200 10/300 GL column) of recombinant 2N4R tau, 2N3R tau, and Tau35. (A) Representative elution profiles showing apparent molecular weights calculated from the elution volumes (arrows) of each tau species in comparison to a standard calibration curve. (B) Scatter plots showing the range of apparent molecular weights determined for each tau species. Bars indicate mean ± SD, n 8.
FIGURE 2SAXS analysis. (A) SAXS profiles from SEC-SAXS for 2N4R tau, 2N3R tau and Tau35 (symbols) and corresponding typical EOM fit (solid lines, χ2 in range 0.98–1.00). Plots vertically displaced relative to each other for clarity. (B) Dimensionless Kratky plots for the three proteins, showing a monotonous increase, indicative of their unfolded nature. (C) Radius of gyration (Rg) distributions for the selected 2N4R tau, 2N3R tau and Tau35 ensembles compared to the random pool. (D) Maximal intramolecular distance (Dmax) distributions for the selected 2N4R tau, 2N3R tau and Tau35 ensembles.
SAXS data collection and analysis.
|
| |||
| Radiation source | PETRA III (DESY) | — | |
| Beamline | EMBL P12 | — | |
| Detector | Pilatus 6M | — | |
| Wavelength | 0.124 nm | — | |
| Sample-to-detector distance | 3.1 m | — | |
| Beam size (FWHM) | 200 × 25 μm2 | — | |
|
| 0.026–7.36 nm−1 | — | |
| Exposure time | 1 s/frame | — | |
| Temperature | 293.2 K | — | |
| |
|
|
|
| Rg | 6.72 ± 0.28 | 6.33 ± 0.28 | 4.64 ± 0.04 |
| Rg PDDF | 6.89 ± 0.03 | 6.32 ± 0.22 | 4.85 ± 0.02 |
| Rg from Flory scaling | 6.9 | 6.6 | 5.0 |
| Dmax | 23.5 | 19.8 | 16.2 |
| Vp | 254 | 211 | 93 |
| VDAM
| 298 | 263 | 109 |
| Vc | 9.90 | 8.95 | 5.90 |
| MW | 36 ± 4 | 37 ± 4 | 19 ± 2 |
| MW (from Vp) | 159 | 132 | 58 |
| MW (from VDAM) (kDa) | 149 | 131 | 55 |
| MW MoW | 58.2 | 44.3 | 27.7 |
| MW Bayes | 116–151 | 93–121 | 59–66 |
| MW from sequence (kDa) | 45.8 | 42.6 | 26.8 |
| Number of amino acids | 441 | 410 | 255 |
Top table: Data collection parameters. Bottom table: Parameters obtained from the analysis.
Rg: radius of gyration.
Rg derived from the PDDF (pair distance distribution function, see FigureS1).
Dmax: maximal intramolecular distance.
Vp: particle volume (evaluated on the regularized intensity).
Dummy Atom Model excluded volume.
Volume of correlation.
MW molecular weight from the forward scattering I(0) (note that additional uncertainty could affect the evaluation based on the calculated E280 in the absence of any Trp residues in the sequence).
MW from Fischer’s method.
MW interval with probability >90%, Bayesian method. (Hajizadeh et al., 2018).
FIGURE 3Aggregation kinetics of 2N4R tau and Tau35. Thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence curves of tau in PBS and DTT, following aggregation in the presence of heparin up to 36 h (A) 1, 2 and 5 µM 2N4R tau. (B) 1, 2 and 5 µM Tau35. (C) 2 µM 2N4R tau (red), 2 µM Tau35 (blue) and 1 µM 2N4R tau with 1 µM Tau35 (green). Values shown are mean ± SEM. 2N4R tau, n = 8; Tau35, n = 10; 2N4R tau with Tau35, n = 5.
Kinetics of heparin-induced aggregation of Tau35 and 2N4R tau alone and in combination measured by ThT fluorescence.
| Tau (µM) | T0.5 (h) | Aggregation rate (AU/h) | Maximum intensity (AU) | ||||||
| 2N4R tau | Tau35 | 2N4R tau/Tau35 | 2N4R tau | Tau35 | 2N4R tau/Tau35 | 2N4R tau | Tau35 | 2N4R tau/Tau35 | |
| 1 | 16.2 ± 0.5 | 13.4 ± 0.7** | — | 627 ± 90 | 980 ± 180 | — | 10,425 ± 1,476 | 13,529 ± 2,341 | — |
| 2 | 15.9 ± 0.9 | 13.6 ± 0.6* | 17.0 ± 1.2# | 1,168 ± 135 | 2,048 ± 343* | 1,290 ± 256 | 18,579 ± 2,262 | 29,815 ± 5,384 | 23,370 ± 4,808 |
| 5 | 16.2 ± 1.2 | 14.4 ± 0.6 | — | 1,973 ± 328 | 3,825 ± 460** | — | 31,052 ± 4,912 | 69,179 ± 8,450** | — |
T0.5 indicates the time taken to reach half maximum intensity. Values are mean ± SEM. 2N4R tau, n = 8; Tau35, n = 10; 2N4R tau/Tau35 (1 µM each protein), n = 5. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, comparison of Tau35 with 2N4R tau, Student’s t-test. #p < 0.05, comparison of 2N4R tau/Tau35 with Tau35 alone, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
FIGURE 4Secondary structure of 2N4R tau and Tau35 heparin-induced aggregation. CD spectra obtained from (A) 2N4R tau and (B) Tau35 in 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4 following aggregation in the presence of heparin and DTT for 0h (red) or 72 h (blue) at 20°C. (C, D) CD spectra of the same samples after centrifugation to separate out the aggregated (pellet, red) from the soluble (S/N, blue) protein. Note that the y axis annotation in C,D is in mdeg rather than Θ because it is not possible to accurately estimate the protein concentration of these samples. (E) Graph showing the percentage of aggregated tau relative to starting material, following heparin-induced aggregation of 2N4R tau and Tau35 for 72 h at 37°C. Bars indicate mean ± SEM, n = 3, **** p < 0.0001, Student’s t-test.
FIGURE 5Structural and morphologic analysis of Tau35 aggregates. Electron micrographs of heparin-induced aggregates Tau35 (A) and 2N4R tau (B) incubated for 72 h at 37°C. (C) Similar morphology of Tau35 aggregates was observed by AFM. (D) X-ray fiber diffraction of aligned Tau35 fibers indicating the presence of a typical cross-β structure.
Parameters of Tau35 fibers measured from atomic force microscopy.
| Dimension | Mean ± SD (nm) | Range (nm) |
| Length | 255 ± 131 | 79–621 |
| Width | 22 ± 2 | 19–28 |
| Height | 5 ± 1 | 4–7 |
The values were obtained from images in which individual fibers did not overlap (n = 31). SD stands for standard deviation.