Literature DB >> 34776703

Cephalometric Analysis of Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Anterior Maxillary Osteotomy Distraction in Cleft Maxillary Hypoplasia.

Adarsh Lingeshbabu Pawar1, Jayanth Basavapattana Shivasubramanya2, Shanavas Kolothu Parambil3, Anand Shivamoga Raju4, Abhitosh Debata5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic unilateral CLAP patients despite the best surgical efforts present with variable degree of maxillary hypoplasia after cleft palate repair. AMOD is an extension of anterior maxillary osteotomy where the resulting segment anterior to the chosen site of vertical corticotomy cut is distracted with the help of hyrax screw through a tooth-borne appliance. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the hard and soft tissue profile changes following AMOD. To determine the ratio of soft tissue changes to the given extent of hard tissue movements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study group consisted of 25 patients with cleft maxillary hypoplasia reporting to the Department of OMFS, Coorg Institute of Dental Science. The preoperative and postoperative radiographs were taken followed by prediction tracing. In comparison of pre-op and post-op ceph mean improvement in hard tissue profile was seen at N-A by 2.84 mm, N-A-Pg by 2.52, ANS-Gn by 2.28 mm, N-ANS by 0.68 mm, 1-Nf by 0.32 and at PNS-ANS was 4.2 mm signifying improvement in middle third of face. Mean improvement in soft tissue profile at G-Sn-Pg angle by 1.2, G-Sn was 3.92 mm, nasolabial angle by 10.92, incisor exposure (Stm-1) by 0.24 mm and interlabial gap by 0.56 mm. On ratio and correlation of soft tissue changes to given extent of hard tissue change, with movement of point A and U1 resulted significant changes in Sn and Ls. Movement of ANS resulted in significant changes in pronasale and columella.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study significant improvement was seen in hard and soft tissue facial profile. In conclusion, AMOD is one of the emerging techniques to correct cleft maxillary hypoplasia which will have a defined definitive role to play in future. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMOD; Cleft maxillary hypoplasia; Unilateral CLAP

Year:  2020        PMID: 34776703      PMCID: PMC8554913          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-020-01404-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  10 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  L K Cheung; H D P Chua
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Osman Bengi; Seniz Karaçay; Erol Akin; Kemal Murat Okçu; Hüseyin Olmez; Sila Mermut
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery--which one is more stable in 5 years?

Authors:  Hannah Daile P Chua; Margareta Bendeus Hägg; Lim Kwong Cheung
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-03-17

4.  Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device.

Authors:  J W Polley; A A Figueroa
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  R B Ross
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1987-01

6.  Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery: clinical morbidities and surgical relapse.

Authors:  Lim Kwong Cheung; Hannah Daile P Chua; Margareta Bendeus Hägg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Soft Tissue Changes in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Anterior Maxillary Distraction versus Conventional Le-Fort I Osteotomy.

Authors:  Eldho Markose; Joby Paulose; Eldho T Paul
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-01-18

8.  An evaluation of soft-tissue changes resulting from Le Fort I maxillary surgery.

Authors:  S Mansour; C Burstone; H Legan
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-07

9.  Anterior Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis in the Hypoplastic Cleft Maxilla: Report of five cases.

Authors:  Sruthi Rao Janardhan; S M Kotrashetti; J B Lingaraj; P X Pinto; K M Keluskar; Siddharth Jain; Piyush Sone; Santhosh Rao
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2013-06-25

10.  Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report.

Authors:  X-X Wang; X Wang; Z-L Li; B Yi; C Liang; Y-L Jia; B-S Zou
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.789

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.