Georgiana McTigue1, Alison Swartz2, Kirsty Brittain3, Zanele Rini3, Christopher J Colvin4, Abigail Harrison1, Landon Myer3, Jennifer Pellowski5. 1. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S121-3, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. 2. Division of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Cape Town School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Cape Town School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa. 4. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S121-3, Providence, RI, 02912, USA; Division of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Cape Town School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa; Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. 5. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S121-3, Providence, RI, 02912, USA; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Cape Town School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: jennifer_pellowski@brown.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Supporting the ability of women living with HIV (WLWH) to avoid unintended pregnancy during the postpartum period decreases the number of new pediatric HIV infections, reduces pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality, and is a cost-effective strategy for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission. However, little is currently known about the contraceptive intentions and experiences of reinitiating family planning use among mothers living with HIV as they transition from pregnancy into postpartum. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To (1) understand the contraceptive trajectories of women living with HIV during pregnancy and postpartum in Cape Town, South Africa, and (2) identify factors shaping differing contraceptive trajectories during the postpartum period. METHODS: Thirty pregnant WLWH were interviewed during their eighth month of pregnancy and completed follow-up interviews at 6-8 weeks and 9-12 months postpartum (n = 81 total interviews). Interview topics included postpartum contraception intentions, contraceptive use, and experiences accessing family planning services. Trajectory analysis of contraceptive intentions was applied after initial thematic coding. RESULTS: While nearly half of women interviewed during pregnancy expressed an intention to utilize a non-injectable contraceptive option after childbirth (e.g. implant, IUD, sterilization, oral contraceptive pills), all women interviewed at one year postpartum had received at least one injection. Three main contraceptive trajectories were identified. (1) realization of contraceptive intentions postpartum; (2) unrealized contraceptive intentions postpartum; and (3) change in contraceptive intention over time. Provider influence, coordination of services, and low contraceptive inventory were identified as potential factors shaping the contraceptive trajectories of participants enrolled in the study. CONCLUSION: Disparities between contraceptive method intentions articulated by WLWH during pregnancy and methods attained postpartum suggest that significant barriers remain for women who are unsatisfied with injectable contraception. Failing to provide postpartum mothers living with HIV their intended family planning method undermines efforts to prevent unintended pregnancy, a key pillar of elimination of mother-to-child transmission.
BACKGROUND: Supporting the ability of women living with HIV (WLWH) to avoid unintended pregnancy during the postpartum period decreases the number of new pediatric HIV infections, reduces pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality, and is a cost-effective strategy for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission. However, little is currently known about the contraceptive intentions and experiences of reinitiating family planning use among mothers living with HIV as they transition from pregnancy into postpartum. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To (1) understand the contraceptive trajectories of women living with HIV during pregnancy and postpartum in Cape Town, South Africa, and (2) identify factors shaping differing contraceptive trajectories during the postpartum period. METHODS: Thirty pregnant WLWH were interviewed during their eighth month of pregnancy and completed follow-up interviews at 6-8 weeks and 9-12 months postpartum (n = 81 total interviews). Interview topics included postpartum contraception intentions, contraceptive use, and experiences accessing family planning services. Trajectory analysis of contraceptive intentions was applied after initial thematic coding. RESULTS: While nearly half of women interviewed during pregnancy expressed an intention to utilize a non-injectable contraceptive option after childbirth (e.g. implant, IUD, sterilization, oral contraceptive pills), all women interviewed at one year postpartum had received at least one injection. Three main contraceptive trajectories were identified. (1) realization of contraceptive intentions postpartum; (2) unrealized contraceptive intentions postpartum; and (3) change in contraceptive intention over time. Provider influence, coordination of services, and low contraceptive inventory were identified as potential factors shaping the contraceptive trajectories of participants enrolled in the study. CONCLUSION: Disparities between contraceptive method intentions articulated by WLWH during pregnancy and methods attained postpartum suggest that significant barriers remain for women who are unsatisfied with injectable contraception. Failing to provide postpartum mothers living with HIV their intended family planning method undermines efforts to prevent unintended pregnancy, a key pillar of elimination of mother-to-child transmission.
Authors: Kate Grindlay; Eleanor Turyakira; Imelda T Kyamwanga; Adrianne Nickerson; Kelly Blanchard Journal: Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2016-09-01
Authors: Michele S O'Shea; Nora E Rosenberg; Jennifer H Tang; Cornelius Mukuzunga; Stephen Kaliti; Mwawi Mwale; Mina C Hosseinipour Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2016-02-10
Authors: Diane Cooper; Jane Harries; Jennifer Moodley; Deborah Constant; Rebecca Hodes; Cathy Mathews; Chelsea Morroni; Margaret Hoffman Journal: Reprod Health Matters Date: 2016-12-06
Authors: Sheree R Schwartz; Helen Rees; Shruti Mehta; Willem Daniel Francois Venter; Taha E Taha; Vivian Black Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rena C Patel; Maricianah Onono; Monica Gandhi; Cinthia Blat; Jill Hagey; Starley B Shade; Eric Vittinghoff; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Sara J Newmann; Craig R Cohen Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 12.767