Literature DB >> 34774886

Using machine learning to predict atrial fibrillation diagnosed after ischemic stroke.

Xiaohan Zheng1, Fusang Wang1, Juan Zhang2, Xiaoli Cui2, Fuping Jiang3, Nihong Chen4, Junshan Zhou4, Jinsong Chen5, Song Lin6, Jianjun Zou7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selecting best candidates for prolonged poststroke cardiac monitoring in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is still challenging. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to select AIS patients at high risk of poststroke atrial fibrillation (AF) for prolonged cardiac monitoring and then to compare ML model with traditional risk scores and classic statistical logistic regression (classic-LR) model.
METHODS: AIS patients from July 2012 to September 2020 across Nanjing First Hospital were collected. We performed the LASSO regression for selecting the critical features and built five ML models to assess the risk of poststroke AF. The SHAP and partial dependence plot (PDP) method were introduced to interpret the optimal model. We also compared ML model with CHADS2 score, CHA2DS2-VASc score, AS5F score, HAVOC score, and classic-LR model.
RESULTS: A total of 3929 AIS patients were included. Among the five ML models, deep neural network (DNN) was the model with best performance. It also exhibited superior performance compared with CHADS2 score, CHA2DS2-VASc score, AS5F score, HAVOC score and classic-LR model. The results of SHAP and PDP method revealed age, cardioembolic stroke, large-artery atherosclerosis stroke, and NIHSS score at admission were the top four important features and revealed the DNN model had good interpretability and reliability.
CONCLUSION: The DNN model achieved best performance and improved prediction performance compared with traditional risk scores and classic-LR model. The DNN model can be applied to identify AIS patients at high risk of poststroke AF as best candidates for prolonged poststroke cardiac monitoring.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Ischemic stroke; Machine learning; Predict

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34774886     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

1.  Modeling of energy consumption factors for an industrial cement vertical roller mill by SHAP-XGBoost: a "conscious lab" approach.

Authors:  Rasoul Fatahi; Hamid Nasiri; Ehsan Dadfar; Saeed Chehreh Chelgani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Using random forest algorithm for glomerular and tubular injury diagnosis.

Authors:  Wenzhu Song; Xiaoshuang Zhou; Qi Duan; Qian Wang; Yaheng Li; Aizhong Li; Wenjing Zhou; Lin Sun; Lixia Qiu; Rongshan Li; Yafeng Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 3.  Machine learning in the detection and management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Felix K Wegner; Lucas Plagwitz; Florian Doldi; Christian Ellermann; Kevin Willy; Julian Wolfes; Sarah Sandmann; Julian Varghese; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.138

4.  Warfarin anticoagulation management during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of internet clinic and machine learning.

Authors:  Meng-Fei Dai; Shu-Yue Li; Ji-Fan Zhang; Bao-Yan Wang; Lin Zhou; Feng Yu; Hang Xu; Wei-Hong Ge
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.