Hanna Kim1, Jae-Eun Byun2, Suk Ran Yoon3, Hashem Koohy4, Haiyoung Jung5, Inpyo Choi6. 1. Immunotherapy Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 2. Immunotherapy Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Department of Biochemistry, School of Life Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea. 3. Immunotherapy Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Department of Functional Genomics, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 4. MRC Human Immunology Unit, Medical Research Council (MRC) Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine (WIMM), John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: hashem.koohy@rdm.ox.ac.uk. 5. Immunotherapy Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Department of Functional Genomics, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: haiyoung@kribb.re.kr. 6. Immunotherapy Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Department of Functional Genomics, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ipchoi@kribb.re.kr.
Abstract
Immune dysregulation is commonly observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces severe lung inflammation and innate immune cell dysregulation. However, the precise interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and the innate immune system is currently unknown. To understand the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and natural killer (NK) cells, several SARS-CoV-2 S protein peptides capable of binding to the NKG2D receptor were screened by in silico analysis. Among them, two peptides, cov1 and cov2, bound to NK cells and NKG2D receptors. These cov peptides increased NK cytotoxicity toward lung cancer cells, stimulated interferon gamma (IFN-γ) production by NK cells, and likely mediated these responses through the phosphorylation of Vav1, a key downstream-signaling molecule of NKG2D and NK activation genes. The direct interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and NK cells is a novel finding, and modulation of this interaction has potential clinical application as a therapeutic target for COVID-19.
Immune dysregulation is commonly observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces severe lung inflammation and innate immune cell dysregulation. However, the precise interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and the innate immune system is currently unknown. To understand the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and natural killer (NK) cells, several SARS-CoV-2 S protein peptides capable of binding to the NKG2D receptor were screened by in silico analysis. Among them, two peptides, cov1 and cov2, bound to NK cells and NKG2D receptors. These cov peptides increased NK cytotoxicity toward lung cancer cells, stimulated interferon gamma (IFN-γ) production by NK cells, and likely mediated these responses through the phosphorylation of Vav1, a key downstream-signaling molecule of NKG2D and NK activation genes. The direct interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and NK cells is a novel finding, and modulation of this interaction has potential clinical application as a therapeutic target for COVID-19.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a
global pandemic threatening millions of lives worldwide, and the rapid
development of effective therapeutics and vaccines is urgently required.
Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
(SARS-CoV-2) can lead to immune system dysregulation and macrophage
activation syndrome in severe cases [1]. The dysregulation of cytotoxic T cells
(CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells has also been reported
[2], [3], [4].NK cells are one of the major innate immune
cells, and are responsible for controlling transformed cells, such as
cancer and virus-infected cells. NK cells have receptors that transmit
activating signals into the cells in response to stimuli from transformed
cells. Moreover, they have inhibitory receptors that deliver signals to
inhibit various activation pathways. The balance between the two signals
is determined by specific ligands and signals from their corresponding
receptors. NKG2A, an inhibitory receptor that is overexpressed in NK
cells in COVID-19 patients, induces NK cell exhaustion, and serves as a
potential therapeutic target [5]. However, there is limited understanding of the
role of NK receptors and their interaction with SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19
pathogenesis.NKG2D is one of the major activating
receptors that delivers critical activating signals. In humans, there are
at least eight ligands, including MICA, MICB, and ULBP1-6, that can bind
to NKG2D [6], [7]. NKG2D is associated with DAP10, a
signal-delivering adapter in humans, and with DAP10 and DAP12 in mice
[8], [9].
Tumors and viruses have devised mechanisms to evade NKG2D recognition by
modulating its ligand expression or by secreting soluble forms of its
ligands [10].Several viruses, including the influenza
virus, cytomegalovirus, and human immunodeficiency virus, interact with
NK cells and exhibit a variety of evasion strategies [11], [12], [13]. Viruses
interfere with NK function by direct infection, regulating NK receptor
signaling, and modulating cytokine secretion. Some viruses interfere with
the recognition between NK cell receptors and ligands. Cowpox
virus-encoded OMCP has a similar structure to NKG2D ligands, and it binds
directly to NKG2D receptors to inhibit the binding of NKG2D ligands
[14]. SARS-CoV-2
likely exhibits similar strategies to overcome antiviral NK cell
responses [15].
Potential strategies include the upregulation of NK inhibitory receptors
and the HLA-I molecule to induce NK exhaustion, and/or the downregulation
of cytotoxic granules such as perforin and granzymes to decrease NK
cytotoxicity. Alternatively, it may reduce the NK cell population by
increasing cell apoptosis.The aim of the present study was to use
in silico analysis to screen for SARS-CoV-2 S
protein peptides that could bind to NKG2D receptors, and evaluate the
downstream effects on NK cell activity.
Results
Selection of NKG2D-binding peptides from the
SARS-CoV-2 S protein
To identify the NKG2D-binding peptides
from the S protein of SARS-CoV-2, the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 S protein
was downloaded from UniPort and scanned for NKG2D binding peptides
through the PepSite2 program. Initially, five 5-mer peptides, four
6-mer peptides, and three 7-mer peptides were selected (Table 1
).
Table 1
Candidate NKG2D-binding SARS-COV-2 S
protein peptides
Sequence
P value
5-mers
QNAQA
0.04885
LPFQQ
0.0405
NQNAQ
0.04885
FQQFG
0.0437
PFQQF
0.0405
6-mers
CNDPFL
0.04716
FQFCND
0.03844(peptide #1, cov1)
EFQFCN
0.03844
FCNDPF
0.04716
7-mers
KCVNFNF
0.03903(peptide #2, cov2)
KVCEFQF
0.04854
CVNFNFN
0.03903
Candidate NKG2D-binding SARS-COV-2 S
protein peptidesAmong the candidate peptides, we selected
two based on their predicted binding scores: one 6-mer peptide
(FQFCND, cov1 peptide #1) and one 7-mer peptide (KCVNFNF, cov2 peptide
#2). Peptide #1 (cov1) covers the 133th-138th amino acid sequences
of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2, and peptide #2 (cov2) covers the
537th-543th. A control peptide, a 7-mer peptide (1201th-1207th amino
acid, QELGKYE) was also designed (Fig. 1
A). The predicted binding of the
peptides to the protein surface of NKG2D was visualized using the
protein-peptide interaction prediction program of PepSite2
(http://pepsite2.russelllab.org,
Fig. 1B, C)
[16].
Fig. 1
Prediction of NKG2D-binding peptides from SARS-CoV-2 S
protein. A. Full amino acid sequence of
the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. Cov1 peptide #1 (FQFCND, 133th-138th), cov2 peptide #2
(KCVNFNF, 537th-543th), and control peptide (QELGKYE, 1201th-1207th) are in red. Receptor
binding domain (331th-524th) for ACE2 is underlined.
B. Predicted binding model of cov1 peptide #1 (circle)
and NKG2D (ribbon) was analyzed using the protein-peptide interaction
prediction program of PepSite. C. Predicted binding
model of cov2 peptide #2 (circle) and NKG2D (ribbon) was analyzed using
the protein-peptide interaction prediction program of
PepSite.
Prediction of NKG2D-binding peptides from SARS-CoV-2 S
protein. A. Full amino acid sequence of
the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. Cov1 peptide #1 (FQFCND, 133th-138th), cov2 peptide #2
(KCVNFNF, 537th-543th), and control peptide (QELGKYE, 1201th-1207th) are in red. Receptor
binding domain (331th-524th) for ACE2 is underlined.
B. Predicted binding model of cov1 peptide #1 (circle)
and NKG2D (ribbon) was analyzed using the protein-peptide interaction
prediction program of PepSite. C. Predicted binding
model of cov2 peptide #2 (circle) and NKG2D (ribbon) was analyzed using
the protein-peptide interaction prediction program of
PepSite.To assess the binding capacity of peptides
to NK cells by flow cytometry, we synthesized FITC-labeled cov1,
FITC-labeled cov2 and control peptides. FITC-cov1 peptides and
FITC-cov2 peptides bound to NK92 cells in a concentration-dependent
manner, while the control peptides did not bind at all (Fig. 2
A). In addition, the FITC-cov2
peptides bound to primary NK cells, and the FITC-control peptides did
not (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2
Binding of S protein NKG2D-binding peptides to NK
cells. A. NK92 cells were incubated with
FITC-labeled control peptide, cov1, or cov2 and binding was analyzed by
flow cytometry. (n=3), (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, student t-test)
B. Primary NK cells were incubated with
FITC-labeled control peptide or cov2 and binding was analyzed by flow
cytometry. C. For competition, soluble NKG2D (500nM,
2500nM, 5000nM) was pre-incubated with FITC-labeled cov peptides (50nM)
or FITC-labeled control peptide (50nM) for 20min, then the binding was
analyzed by flow cytometry.
Binding of S protein NKG2D-binding peptides to NK
cells. A. NK92 cells were incubated with
FITC-labeled control peptide, cov1, or cov2 and binding was analyzed by
flow cytometry. (n=3), (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, student t-test)
B. Primary NK cells were incubated with
FITC-labeled control peptide or cov2 and binding was analyzed by flow
cytometry. C. For competition, soluble NKG2D (500nM,
2500nM, 5000nM) was pre-incubated with FITC-labeled cov peptides (50nM)
or FITC-labeled control peptide (50nM) for 20min, then the binding was
analyzed by flow cytometry.To prove this binding is specific for
NKG2D, competition between soluble recombinant NKG2D and cov peptides
were analyzed. The FITC-cov peptides (50nM) were pre-incubated with
soluble NKG2D protein (500nM, 2500nM, 5000nM) for 20min before
incubating with NK cells. Soluble NKG2D competed with the cov2 peptide
for binding to NK cells, but did not with the cov1 peptide
(Fig. 2C). It
seems that cov1 binds to other site of NKG2D which does not compete
with soluble NGK2D (Phe78-Val216) or its binding is non-specific.
Next, FITC-labeled cov2 peptides or FITC-labeled control peptides were
injected into mice. It was observed that only FITC-labeled cov2
peptides bound to NK cells in vivo (Fig.
S1).
SARS-CoV-2 S protein peptides increase NK
activity
Next, the effects of peptides on NK
function were analyzed. NK92 cells were incubated with the peptides
for 2 h before NK cytotoxicity was analyzed using H460 lung cancer
cells. The cov1 and cov2 peptides significantly increased NK
cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner compared to the control
peptide (Fig. 3
A). Furthermore, the cov1 and cov2
peptides increased NK cytotoxicity against other lung cancer cells
(Fig. 3B).
Incubation of primary NK cells with the peptides increased NK
cytotoxicity against H460 cells relative to the control peptide
(Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3
Effects of S protein NKG2D-binding peptides on NK cytotoxicity.
A. Effects of peptides on NK92 cytotoxicity against H460
lung cancer cells. (n=8) B. Effects of peptides on
NK92 cytotoxicity against lung cancer cell lines. (n=3)
C. Effects of peptides on primary NK cell
cytotoxicity against H460 lung cancer cells. (n=2), (*p<0.05,
**p<0.01, student t-test)
Effects of S protein NKG2D-binding peptides on NK cytotoxicity.
A. Effects of peptides on NK92 cytotoxicity against H460
lung cancer cells. (n=8) B. Effects of peptides on
NK92 cytotoxicity against lung cancer cell lines. (n=3)
C. Effects of peptides on primary NK cell
cytotoxicity against H460 lung cancer cells. (n=2), (*p<0.05,
**p<0.01, student t-test)Then, the effects of the peptides on NK
cell interferon gamma (IFN-γ) production were analyzed. Secreted IFN-γ
from NK92 cells after peptide treatment was measured by ELISA
(Fig. 4
). Cov1 and cov2 peptides increased
IFN-γ secretion at concentrations between 10-100 nM.
Fig. 4
Effects of S protein NKG2D-binding peptides on NK cell IFN-γ
production. NK92 cells were incubated with various
concentrations of peptides for 24 h, and secreted IFN-γ production was
measured by ELISA. Data represent the average of three separate
experiments.
Effects of S protein NKG2D-binding peptides on NK cell IFN-γ
production. NK92 cells were incubated with various
concentrations of peptides for 24 h, and secreted IFN-γ production was
measured by ELISA. Data represent the average of three separate
experiments.Activation-induced cell death was assessed
[17], and
peptide-treated NK cells were incubated up to 48 h in the absence
(Fig. S2A) or presence (Fig. S2B) of tumor cells. There was no
difference in the levels of NK cell apoptosis between control or cov
peptide treatment.
SARS-CoV-2 S protein peptides induces NK
activating signals
To understand the signaling events induced
by the cov peptides, protein phosphorylation of NKG2D downstream
molecules was assayed. Vav1, a key molecule for NKG2D signaling
[9], [18], [19], was phosphorylated by cov1 and cov2,
and not by the control peptide (Fig. 5
). Furthermore, the change of
molecular signature was analyzed by RNA sequencing after peptide
treatment. Heat map clustering demonstrated that the 110 genes were
quite differentially regulated by the peptide treatment, exhibiting a
homogenous expression pattern within the same sample group
(Fig. 6
A, Table S1). A volcano plot
demonstrating the ratios of cov2 peptide/con peptide showed that 259
activated genes (red spots) and 215 inhibited genes (blue spots) were
regulated by cov2 treatment. Based on the Quick GO program, the number
of genes including cell activation, defense response, and immune
response regulated by cov2 treatment was clustered (Fig. 6B, Table S2). In
addition, the number of genes related to NK function such as natural
killer cell activation, natural killer cell cytotoxicity, ether lipid
metabolism, antigen processing and presentation and natural killer
cell differentiation was clustered (Fig. 6C). The correlation analysis
revealed that several NK cell activation genes such as IFNG, FADD,
CD48, CCL4, MDM2 and IL2RA were identified as cov2 response genes
(Fig. 6D).
Fig. 5
Effects of S protein NKG2D-binding peptides on Vav1
phosphorylation. NK92 cells were treated with 100 nM
peptides for 5, 10, and 30 min. Then, cell lysates were analyzed by
immunoblotting using vav1 and p-vav1 antibodies.
Fig. 6
Analysis of cov peptide response genes. A. Heat map
clustering of 57 gene sets (fold change=1.5, p-value=0.050, normalized
data (log2)=4.00). Red represents a higher level of expression and blue
represents a lower level expression. B. Gene ontology
categories of cov peptide response genes. Selected genes were classified
according to biological processes. C. Pathway
categories of cov peptide response. B and C processes significantly
enriched in the set of genes identified by RNA-seq as up- or
down-regulated and categorized using the Quick Go program. Numbers in the
bars indicate the log value assigned to each gene ontology term and
pathway term. D. A list of NK-related gene (IFNG,
FADD, CD48, CCL4, MDM2 and IL2RA) expression and heat map by cov peptide
treatment. con (control peptide treatment); cov2 (cov2 peptide
treatment).
Effects of S protein NKG2D-binding peptides on Vav1
phosphorylation. NK92 cells were treated with 100 nM
peptides for 5, 10, and 30 min. Then, cell lysates were analyzed by
immunoblotting using vav1 and p-vav1 antibodies.Analysis of cov peptide response genes. A. Heat map
clustering of 57 gene sets (fold change=1.5, p-value=0.050, normalized
data (log2)=4.00). Red represents a higher level of expression and blue
represents a lower level expression. B. Gene ontology
categories of cov peptide response genes. Selected genes were classified
according to biological processes. C. Pathway
categories of cov peptide response. B and C processes significantly
enriched in the set of genes identified by RNA-seq as up- or
down-regulated and categorized using the Quick Go program. Numbers in the
bars indicate the log value assigned to each gene ontology term and
pathway term. D. A list of NK-related gene (IFNG,
FADD, CD48, CCL4, MDM2 and IL2RA) expression and heat map by cov peptide
treatment. con (control peptide treatment); cov2 (cov2 peptide
treatment).
Discussion
It has been reported that SARS-CoV-2
infection induces a delayed or suppressed type I IFN response with a
reduction in T cell and NK cell numbers [20], [21]. Moreover,
there is a correlation between the decreased number of NK cells and the
severity of COVID-19 [21]. NKG2A expression in NK cells is induced in
COVID-19 patients, suggesting that the functional exhaustion of NK cells
is associated with the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, NK
cells are responsible for the accumulation of neutrophils during
SARS-CoV-2 infection [17].The mechanisms underlying reduced cell number
and NK cell dysfunction in COVID-19 patients remain unclear. SARS-CoV-2
may infect and kill NK cells or promote activation-induced cell death. NK
cell dysregulation leads to a decrease in IFN-γ production and activation
of cytolytic T cells, which are critical in viral defense.In this study, SARS-CoV-2 S protein peptides,
cov1 and cov2, which bind to NK cells and NKG2D receptors were identified
by in silico analysis, protein-peptide interaction
modeling, and flow cytometric binding assays. Functionally, these
peptides increased NK cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production. The NKG2D
ligands, MICA and ULPB3, bind to NKG2D through the 180th-200th amino acid of NKG2D
[7], [22].
Structural binding prediction showed that the binding sites of the two
peptides to NKG2D (120th, 121th, 158th, 188th, 189th, 202th amino acid) partially overlapped with NKG2D
ligand binding sites. These two peptides can activate NKG2D signaling, as
shown in our study, or potentially compete with NKG2D ligands for NKG2D
binding sites. However, further competitive binding assays are necessary
to confirm this strategy.The cov1 and cov2 peptides activated NK cells
through the NKG2D receptor and Vav1 phosphorylation. Activation-induced
NK cell death is typically dependent on IL-2 priming and granzyme B
leakage [23].
However, activation by cov1 and cov2 did not lead to activation-induced
NK cell death, suggesting an alternative mode of activation.Recently, it was reported that SARS-CoV-2 S1
and S2 proteins increased NK cell migration and IFN-γ secretion
[24]. This
implies that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein may interact with NK cells
directly. However, lung epithelial cells transfected with SARS-CoV-2 S1
protein reduced NK cell degranulation and IFN-γ secretion. Transfected
SARS-CoV-2 increased HLA-E expression in lung epithelial cells and NKG2A
expression in NK cells after co-culture with lung epithelial cells
transfected with SP1 protein. This interaction may compromise the
anti-viral activity of NK cells through their exhaustion. At the same
time, it was reported that a CD3-CD56dimCD16- regulatory NK
subset were significantly increased in COVID-19 patients with severe
symptoms, while cytotoxic CD3-CD56dimCD16+ NK subsets
were decreased. Similarly, PD-1+ NK cells
were higher in COVID-19 patients compared to heathy controls, indicating
that functional exhaustion and subset alteration of NK cells may
contribute to the progression of COVID-19 [25]. Taken together, SARS-CoV-2 S protein
can increase NK activity by direct binding or decrease NK activity by
modulating HLA expression in transfected cells.Single-cell analysis of bronchial samples
from severe COVID-19 patients showed a strong enrichment in NK cells
compared to both healthy controls and patients with moderate COVID-19
[26]. In
addition, robust NK cell activation was observed in peripheral blood and
bronchioalveolar lavage from COVID-19 patients [27]. A higher expression of
Ki-67 was monitored in both NKG2A+CD65L+CD56dim NK cells. Gene expression and signaling profiles of NK
cells from bronchioalveolar fluid of severe COVID-19 patients displayed
an activated and inflamed pattern, suggesting robust NK cell activation
toward SARS-CoV-2 infection and a role for NK cells in the early acute
phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection and in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Finally, we
searched for differentially expressed genes and signaling cascades
following cov peptide treatment. The upregulated genes were related to NK
cell cytotoxicity and immunity, and included CCRL2, TNFSF9, EBI3, ACAA1
and IFNG (> 1.5-fold upregulation). Pathway-based analysis showed that
natural killer cell cytotoxicity, natural killer cell activation pathways
were upregulated. Specifically, FADD, CD48, MDM2, IL2RA and IFNG were
identified in this pathway analysis.The appearance of new SARS-CoV-2 variants is
increasing. We checked the possible amino acid change in cov1 and cov2 of
SARS-CoV-2 S protein. We found one variant (D138Y) in cov1 reported from
Brazil
(https://bv-brc.org/view/VariantLineage/#view_tab=overview),
which may increase transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2.Based on our observations, cov peptides or
these regions of S protein can interact with NKG2D of NK cells to
modulate NK function. By blocking or enhancing this interaction, we can
regulate viral and immune interaction and this interaction will be a
potential target for SARS-CoV-2 treatment.In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 S protein
NKG2D-binding peptides regulate NK cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production.
This interaction induced Vav1 phosphorylation and NK activating genes in
NK cells. Modulation of this interaction is a key event linking
SARS-CoV-2 and innate immunity, and it serves as a possible therapeutic
target for SARS-CoV-2 treatment.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and antibodies
Control peptide (Q-E-L-K-Y-E), cov1
peptide (F-Q-F-C-N-D), and cov2 peptide (K-C-V-N-F-N-F) were
synthesized by Peptron Co (Daejeon, Korea) and stored at -80℃. Control
peptide FITC (FITC-Ahx-Q-E-L-K-Y-E) and cov2 peptide FITC
(FITC-Ahx-K-C-V-N-F-N-F) were also synthesized by Peptron Co (Daejeon,
Korea). Vav1 and p-Vav antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Dallas, USA), and the human IFN-γ ELISA kit was
purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, USA). Soluble recombinant NKG2D
(Ph278-Val216) was obtained from Biolegend (San Diego, USA).
In silico analysis of SARS-CoV-2 peptides
binding to NKG2D
The sequence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
was downloaded from UniPort
KB-P59594(SPIKE_CVHSA)(https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P59594).
The full protein sequence was scanned for k-mers with k=5, 6, 7, 8 and
unique peptides were identified. The PepSite2 algorithm [28] was run for each k-mer
as described in the PepSite API: ‘curl -s
\“http://pepsite2.russelllab.org/match? dB=1mpu&&ligand=” +
kmer +“&format=best_pval\” “ + ”> “ + outputfile’. Peptides
with a p-value < 0.05 were considered potential candidate targets
for NKG2D. With this setting, 5, 4, 3, and 0 peptides were selected
for each 5, 6, 7, and 8-mers, respectively.
Cell culture
The human NK92 cell line was obtained from
the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD) and
cultured in α-minimal essential medium (Welgene) supplemented with
12.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 12.5% horse serum, 0.2 mM myo
inositol, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.02 mM folic acid, 1%
antibiotics, and 20 ng/ml IL-2 in a humidified atmosphere with 5%
CO2 at 37℃. The human lung cancer lines
(H358, H460, and H3122) were obtained from ATCC and cultured in RPMI
medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotics. Primary NK cells
were obtained from human cord blood provided by a local hospital (IRB
approval number P01-201610-31-002), as described previously
[29].
Briefly, CD3 cells and red blood cells were depleted from mononuclear
cells with a Rosettesep cocktail (STEMCELL technologies) and
CD3-depleted cells were cultured in α-minimal essential medium
(Welgene) supplemented with human IL-15 (10 ng/mL), IL-21 (10 ng/mL),
and 10−6 M hydrocortisone (StemCell
Technologies).
Flow cytometry
NK cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and
stained with the indicated antibodies or FITC-labeled peptides in a
staining buffer (PBS containing 1% FBS and 0.01% NaN3) for 20 min at 4℃. After washing, flow cytometry was
performed on a FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed
using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
NK cytotoxicity
NK92 or primary NK cells were incubated
for 12 h in NK92 culture media supplemented with 0.1% BSA instead of
12.5% FBS and 12.5% horse serum. After washing, cells were incubated
with various concentrations of peptides (control, cov1, cov2) for 2 h,
and then NK cytotoxicity was evaluated by a calcein-AM release assay
[30].
Briefly, target cells were labeled with calcein-AM (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h. Then, calcein-labeled target cells (1 ×
104 cells per well) and serially
diluted NK cells were co-cultured in 96-well round-bottom plates for 4
h. “Maximum release” was simulated by adding 2% Triton X-100 to the
target cells, and “spontaneous release” was simulated by adding
culture medium to the target cells. The calcein released into the
supernatant was measured using a multi-mode microplate reader
(Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The percent specific lysis was
calculated according to the formula ((test release-spontaneous
release)/(maximum release-spontaneous release)) × 100.
IFN-γ assay
NK cells, preincubated in 0.1% BSA for 12
h, were treated with peptides (control, cov1, cov2) for 2 h. Then,
peptide-treated NK cells were co-cultured with H460 lung cancer cell
for 24 h. The culture supernatants were collected and analyzed for
IFN-γ by using a human IFN-γ ELISA kit (Invitrogen).
Vav1 phosphorylation
NK cells, preincubated in 0.1% BSA for 12
h, were treated with peptides (control, cov1, cov2) for the indicated
times. Then, cells were washed and lysed in RIPA II lysis buffer
(genDEPOT) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Ten
micrograms of sample was separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to a
membrane. The membrane was immunoblotted with Vav1 and p-Vav1
antibodies.
RNA sequencing
For control and test RNAs, library
construction was performed using QuantSeq 3'mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit
(Lexogen, Inc., Austria) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
In brief, 500 ng of total RNA was prepared and an oligo-dT primer
containing an Illumina-compatible sequence at its 5'end was hybridized
to the RNA, and reverse transcription was performed. After degradation
of the RNA template, second strand synthesis was initiated by a random
primer containing an Illumina-compatible linker sequence at its 5'end.
The double-stranded library was purified using magnetic beads to
remove all reaction components. The library was amplified to add the
complete adapter sequences required for cluster generation. The
finished library was purified from PCR components. High-throughput
sequencing was performed as single-end 75 sequencing using NextSeq 500
(Illumina, Inc., USA).
Data analysis
QuantSeq 3'mRNA-Seq reads were aligned
using Bowtie2. Differentially expressed genes were determined based on
counts from unique and multiple alignments using coverage in Bedtools.
The read count data were processed based on the quantile normalization
method using EdgeR within R development Core Team using Bioconductor.
Gene classification was based on searches done by Quick GO
(https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/) and
Medline databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).One Sentence SummaryTo understand the crosstalk between
SARS-CoV-2 and the innate immune system, two SARS-CoV-2 S protein
peptides capable of binding to the NKG2D receptor of natural killer
(NK) cells were identified and found to activate NK cells and
stimulate IFN-γ production; SARS-CoV-2 S protein interacts directly
with NK cells.
Declaration of Competing
Interest
The authors declare that they have no known
competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have
appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Authors: Christopher Maucourant; Iva Filipovic; Andrea Ponzetta; Soo Aleman; Martin Cornillet; Laura Hertwig; Benedikt Strunz; Antonio Lentini; Björn Reinius; Demi Brownlie; Angelica Cuapio; Eivind Heggernes Ask; Ryan M Hull; Alvaro Haroun-Izquierdo; Marie Schaffer; Jonas Klingström; Elin Folkesson; Marcus Buggert; Johan K Sandberg; Lars I Eriksson; Olav Rooyackers; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren; Karl-Johan Malmberg; Jakob Michaëlsson; Nicole Marquardt; Quirin Hammer; Kristoffer Strålin; Niklas K Björkström Journal: Sci Immunol Date: 2020-08-21
Authors: Clara Di Vito; Francesca Calcaterra; Nicolò Coianiz; Sara Terzoli; Antonio Voza; Joanna Mikulak; Silvia Della Bella; Domenico Mavilio Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: Demi Brownlie; Inga Rødahl; Renata Varnaite; Hilmir Asgeirsson; Hedvig Glans; Sara Falck-Jones; Sindhu Vangeti; Marcus Buggert; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren; Jakob Michaëlsson; Sara Gredmark-Russ; Anna Smed-Sörensen; Nicole Marquardt Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 7.561