Literature DB >> 34773568

Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection devices in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of in-hospital outcomes.

Junichi Shimamura1, Toshiki Kuno2, Aaqib Malik3, Yujiro Yokoyama4, Rahul Gupta5, Hasan Ahmad6, Alexandros Briasoulis7.   

Abstract

The evidence regarding the impact of cerebral embolic protection devices (EPDs) on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate in-hospital outcomes with the use of cerebral EPDs in TAVR. We performed a comprehensive EMBASE and PUBMED search to investigate randomized control studies or propensity score-matched retrospective studies which assessed patients undergoing TAVR with or without EPD up to April 2021. Endpoints of interest were in-hospital mortality, stroke, acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, major bleeding, vascular complication, length of stay. Ten studies involving 173,002 patients with EPD (n = 16,898, 9.8%) and those without (n = 156,104, 90.2%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The use of EPD was associated with significantly lower risk of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio [95% confidential interval]: 0.64 [0.46; 0.89]), but similar rate of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidential interval]: 0.75 [0.54; 1.05]). No differences were observed in acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, major bleeding, vascular complication, length of stay. EPD during TAVR was associated with lower in-hospital stroke but did not affect procedural complications and length of stay.
© 2021. Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embolic protection device; Stroke; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34773568     DOI: 10.1007/s12928-021-00823-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther        ISSN: 1868-4297


  4 in total

1.  When a meta-analysis equals a single large-scale trial with meaningful follow-up.

Authors:  Eliano P Navarese; Dean J Kereiakes; Diana A Gorog; Alexandra J Lansky; Felicita Andreotti
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Successfully Managed Access-Site Complication Was Not Associated With Worse Outcome After Percutaneous Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Up-to-Date Insights From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry.

Authors:  Yohsuke Honda; Masahiro Yamawaki; Takahide Nakano; Kenji Makino; Yoshiaki Ito; Fumiaki Yashima; Norio Tada; Toru Naganuma; Futoshi Yamanaka; Kazuki Mizutani; Minoru Tabata; Hiroshi Ueno; Kensuke Takagi; Yusuke Watanabe; Masanori Yamamoto; Shinichi Shirai; Kentaro Hayashida
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2021-08-08

3.  Estimation of DAPT Study Treatment Effects in Contemporary Clinical Practice: Findings From the EXTEND-DAPT Study.

Authors:  Neel M Butala; Kamil F Faridi; Hector Tamez; Jordan B Strom; Yang Song; Changyu Shen; Eric A Secemsky; Laura Mauri; Dean J Kereiakes; Jeptha P Curtis; C Michael Gibson; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Cerebral Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Luca Testa; Azeem Latib; Matteo Casenghi; Riccardo Gorla; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Bedogni
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Yusuke Kobari; Taku Inohara; Kentaro Hayashida
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-09-17

Review 2.  Antithrombotic Therapy Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Camille Granger; Paul Guedeney; Jean-Philippe Collet
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Embolic Protection with the TriGuard 3 System in Nonagenarian Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Alexander Lind; Rolf Alexander Jánosi; Matthias Totzeck; Arjang Ruhparwar; Tienush Rassaf; Fadi Al-Rashid
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.